Article published in:
Modality in Grammar and Discourse
Edited by Joan L. Bybee and Suzanne Fleischman
[Typological Studies in Language 32] 1995
► pp. 55
Cited by

Cited by 25 other publications

No author info given
2016.  In Contrastive Pragmatics and Translation [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 261], Crossref logo
Abraham, Werner
2020.  In Modality in Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics, Crossref logo
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey N. Leech, Susan Conrad, Edward Finegan & Randolph Quirk
2021.  In Grammar of Spoken and Written English, Crossref logo
Depraetere, Ilse & Susan Reed
2020.  In The Handbook of English Linguistics,  pp. 207 ff. Crossref logo
Divjak, Dagmar, Nina Szymor & Anna Socha-Michalik
2015. Less is more: possibility and necessity as centres of gravity in a usage-based classification of core modals in Polish. Russian Linguistics 39:3  pp. 327 ff. Crossref logo
Fitzmaurice, Susan
2000. Tentativeness and insistence in the expression of politeness in Margaret Cavendish’s Sociable Letters. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 9:1  pp. 7 ff. Crossref logo
Fronhofer, Nina-Maria
2019.  In Emotion in Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 302],  pp. 213 ff. Crossref logo
Huschová, Petra
2014. Possibility readings of can and may and their potential interchangeability. Brno Studies in English 40:1  pp. 89 ff. Crossref logo
Huschová, Petra
2015. EXPLORING MODAL VERBS CONVEYING POSSIBILITY IN ACADEMIC DISCOURSE. Discourse and Interaction 8:2  pp. 35 ff. Crossref logo
Kotze, Haidee
2019.  In English in Multilingual South Africa,  pp. 101 ff. Crossref logo
Mammadova, Arzu
2019. Multicultural paradigms of student empowerment in educational discourses: Azerbaijan, UK and USA as case studies. Journal of Multicultural Discourses 14:2  pp. 152 ff. Crossref logo
Moore, Colette
2007. The Spread of Grammaticalized Forms. Journal of English Linguistics 35:2  pp. 117 ff. Crossref logo
Nordlinger, Rachel & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
1997. Scope and the development of epistemic modality: evidence from ought to. English Language and Linguistics 1:2  pp. 295 ff. Crossref logo
Rahimian, Jalal & Zohreh Vahedi
2010. The Semantic-Pragmatic Analysis of Persian Modal Verbs Based on Papafragou's Model. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 6:1 Crossref logo
Rizomilioti, Vassiliki
2006.  In Information Technology in Languages for Specific Purposes [Educational Linguistics, 7],  pp. 53 ff. Crossref logo
Rocci, Andrea
2017.  In Modality in Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 29],  pp. 371 ff. Crossref logo
Rocci, Andrea & Elena Musi
2017.  In Formal Models in the Study of Language,  pp. 391 ff. Crossref logo
Salama, Amir H.Y.
2021. The force dynamics of adjectival deontic modality in the mediatised register of the fatwa: a corpus cognitive–semantic analysis. Corpora 16:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Szymański, Leszek
2021. A corpus-based analysis of the modal can with the perfect in American English from a synchronic and diachronic perspective. Studia Neophilologica  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
TAMURA, YUKI-SHIGE
2000. RELATIVE SUBJECTIFICATION AND A SEMANTIC NETWORK MODEL OF ENGLISH MODAL AUXILIARIES. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 17:1  pp. 80 ff. Crossref logo
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2011. Modality from a Historical Perspective. Language and Linguistics Compass 5:6  pp. 381 ff. Crossref logo
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher
2001.  In Regularity in Semantic Change, Crossref logo
Varttala, Teppo
1999. Remarks on the Communicative Functions of Hedging in Popular Scientific and Specialist Research Articles on Medicine. English for Specific Purposes 18:2  pp. 177 ff. Crossref logo
Whitty, Lauren
2019. A Reanalysis of the Uses of Can and Could: A Corpus-Based Approach. Corpus Pragmatics 3:3  pp. 225 ff. Crossref logo
Лорентцен, Елена
2012. Дизъюнкция однородных членов предложения в русском и датском языках. Scando-Slavica 58:2  pp. 195 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.