Cited by

Cited by 39 other publications

ALFERINK, INGE & MARIANNE GULLBERG
2014. French–Dutch bilinguals do not maintain obligatory semantic distinctions: Evidence from placement verbs. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17:1  pp. 22 ff. DOI logo
Aurnague, Michel & Fabien Cappelli
2019. Le mouvement fictif à l’épreuve de la factualité : catégorisation des verbes et données de corpus. Travaux de linguistique n° 77:2  pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Baicchi, Annalisa & Cristiano Broccias
2024. Introduction. In Constructional and Cognitive Explorations of Contrastive Linguistics,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Bogaards, Maarten
2019. Posture verbs combined with past participles in Dutch. Linguistics in the Netherlands 36  pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
De Knop, Sabine & Julien Perrez
2014. Conceptual metaphors as a tool for the efficient teaching of Dutch and German posture verbs. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 12:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Flecken, Monique & Geertje van Bergen
2020. Can the English stand the bottle like the Dutch? Effects of relational categories on object perception. Cognitive Neuropsychology 37:5-6  pp. 271 ff. DOI logo
Hermann, Manon
2024. A Contrastive Analysis of Placement Verbs in German and Dutch. In Constructional and Cognitive Explorations of Contrastive Linguistics,  pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
Heyvaert, Pauline
Klippel, Alexander, Thora Tenbrink & Daniel R. Montello
2012. 6 The role of structure and function in the conceptualization of direction. In Motion Encoding in Language and Space,  pp. 102 ff. DOI logo
Knop, Sabine De
Lander, Yury, Timur Maisak & Ekaterina Rakhilina
2012. 4 Verbs of aquamotion: semantic domains and lexical systems. In Motion Encoding in Language and Space,  pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
Lemmens, Maarten
2017. A Cognitive, Usage-Based View on Lexical Pragmatics: Response to Hall. In Semantics and Pragmatics: Drawing a Line [Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, 11],  pp. 101 ff. DOI logo
Lesuisse, Mégane
2022. Exploring the conceptualisation of locative events in French, English, and Dutch: Insights from eye-tracking on two memorisation tasks. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 10:1  pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Lesuisse, Mégane & Maarten Lemmens
2018. Grammaticalisation cut short. In Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 21],  pp. 43 ff. DOI logo
Lesuisse, Mégane & Maarten Lemmens
2023. Looking differently at locative events: the cognitive impact of linguistic preferences. Language and Cognition  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Mulders, Iris
2021. Are Dutch posture verbs lexical or functional elements?. Linguistics in the Netherlands 38  pp. 40 ff. DOI logo
Newman, John
2022. Experiential motivation and the linguistics of sitting, standing, and lying. WIREs Cognitive Science 13:4 DOI logo
Nikanne, Urpo & Emile Van Der Zee
2012. 11 The lexical representation of path curvature in motion expressions: a three‐way path curvature distinction. In Motion Encoding in Language and Space,  pp. 187 ff. DOI logo
Obert, Karolin
2020. Complex predicates and space in Dâw (Naduhup language, AM). STUF - Language Typology and Universals 73:1  pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Pajusalu, Renate, Neeme Kahusk, Heili Orav, Ann Veismann, Kadri Vider & Haldur Õim
2012. 3 The encoding of motion events in Estonian. In Motion Encoding in Language and Space,  pp. 44 ff. DOI logo
Schmidtke, Hedda R.
2012. 10 Path and place: the lexical specification of granular compatibility. In Motion Encoding in Language and Space,  pp. 166 ff. DOI logo
Staden, Miriam van & Bhuvana Narasimhan
2012. 8 Granularity in the cross‐linguistic encoding of motion and location. In Motion Encoding in Language and Space,  pp. 134 ff. DOI logo
Stosic, Dejan
2009. La notion de « manière » dans la sémantique de l'espace. Langages n° 175:3  pp. 103 ff. DOI logo
Suleimanova, Olga A. & Marina A. Fomina
2019. THE ROLE OF SUBJECT IN LINGUISTIC REPRESENTATION OF ITSSTATE OF BEING: THE VERBS STOJAT’, LEZHAT’, SIDET’. Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University (Linguistics) :1  pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Tutton, Mark
2012. 9 Granularity, space, and motion‐framed location. In Motion Encoding in Language and Space,  pp. 149 ff. DOI logo
Valenzuela, Javier, Joseph Hilferty & Oscar Vilarroya
2016. Why are embodied experiments relevant to cognitive linguistics?. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 30  pp. 265 ff. DOI logo
van Bergen, Geertje, Monique Flecken & Rachel Wu
2019. Rapid target selection of object categories based on verbs: Implications for language‐categorization interactions. Psychophysiology 56:9 DOI logo
Vulchanova, Mila, Liliana Martinez & Valentin Vulchanov
2012. 2 Distinctions in the linguistic encoding of motion: evidence from a free naming task. In Motion Encoding in Language and Space,  pp. 11 ff. DOI logo
Mila Vulchanova & Emile van der Zee
2012. Motion Encoding in Language and Space, DOI logo
Winterboer, Andi, Thora Tenbrink & Reinhard Moratz
2012. 5 Spatial directionals for robot navigation. In Motion Encoding in Language and Space,  pp. 84 ff. DOI logo
Xiao, Lin
2022. The diachronic evolution of posture verbs in Chinese. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 58:4  pp. 933 ff. DOI logo
Zacks, Jeffrey M. & Barbara Tversky
2012. 7 Granularity in taxonomy, time, and space. In Motion Encoding in Language and Space,  pp. 122 ff. DOI logo
Zee, Emile van der & Mila Vulchanova
2012. 1 Introduction. In Motion Encoding in Language and Space,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2012. Preface. In Motion Encoding in Language and Space,  pp. vii ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2012. Copyright Page. In Motion Encoding in Language and Space,  pp. iv ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2012. The Contributors. In Motion Encoding in Language and Space,  pp. viii ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2012. Abbreviations. In Motion Encoding in Language and Space,  pp. xii ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.