Part of
The Linguistics of Sitting, Standing and LyingEdited by John Newman
[Typological Studies in Language 51] 2002
► pp. 103–139
Edited by John Newman
[Typological Studies in Language 51] 2002
► pp. 103–139
6. The semantic network of Dutch posture verbs
Maarten Lemmens |
Université Lille 3 and UMR 8528 SILEX du CNRS, France, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
Cited by
Cited by 35 other publications
ALFERINK, INGE & MARIANNE GULLBERG
2014. French–Dutch bilinguals do not maintain obligatory semantic distinctions: Evidence from placement verbs. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17:1 ► pp. 22 ff. 
Aurnague, Michel & Fabien Cappelli
2019. Le mouvement fictif à l’épreuve de la factualité : catégorisation des verbes et données de corpus. Travaux de linguistique n° 77:2 ► pp. 15 ff.
Bogaards, Maarten
2019. Posture verbs combined with past participles in Dutch. Linguistics in the Netherlands 36 ► pp. 67 ff.
De Knop, Sabine & Julien Perrez
2014. Conceptual metaphors as a tool for the efficient teaching of Dutch and German posture verbs. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 12:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Flecken, Monique & Geertje van Bergen
2020. Can the English stand the bottle like the Dutch? Effects of relational categories on object perception. Cognitive Neuropsychology 37:5-6 ► pp. 271 ff.
Heyvaert, Pauline
2018. Het gebruik van de Nederlandse plaatsingswerkwoorden ‘zetten’ en ‘leggen’ door Franstalige leerders van het Nederlands. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 7:1 ► pp. 45 ff.
Klippel, Alexander, Thora Tenbrink & Daniel R. Montello
2012. 6 The role of structure and function in the conceptualization of direction. In Motion Encoding in Language and Space, ► pp. 102 ff.
Knop, Sabine De
2020. The embodied teaching of complex verbal constructions with German placement verbs and spatial prepositions. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18:1 ► pp. 131 ff.
Lander, Yury, Timur Maisak & Ekaterina Rakhilina
2012. 4 Verbs of aquamotion: semantic domains and lexical systems. In Motion Encoding in Language and Space, ► pp. 67 ff.
Lemmens, Maarten
2017. A Cognitive, Usage-Based View on Lexical Pragmatics: Response to Hall. In Semantics and Pragmatics: Drawing a Line [Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, 11], ► pp. 101 ff.
Lesuisse, Mégane
2022. Exploring the conceptualisation of locative events in French, English, and Dutch: Insights from eye-tracking on two memorisation tasks. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 10:1 ► pp. 121 ff.
Lesuisse, Mégane & Maarten Lemmens
2018. Grammaticalisation cut short. In Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 21], ► pp. 43 ff.
Mulders, Iris
2021. Are Dutch posture verbs lexical or functional elements?. Linguistics in the Netherlands 38 ► pp. 40 ff.
Newman, John
2022. Experiential motivation and the linguistics of sitting, standing, and lying. WIREs Cognitive Science 13:4
Nikanne, Urpo & Emile Van Der Zee
2012. 11 The lexical representation of path curvature in motion expressions: a three‐way path curvature distinction. In Motion Encoding in Language and Space, ► pp. 187 ff.
Obert, Karolin
2020. Complex predicates and space in Dâw (Naduhup language, AM). STUF - Language Typology and Universals 73:1 ► pp. 27 ff.
Pajusalu, Renate, Neeme Kahusk, Heili Orav, Ann Veismann, Kadri Vider & Haldur Õim
2012. 3 The encoding of motion events in Estonian. In Motion Encoding in Language and Space, ► pp. 44 ff.
Schmidtke, Hedda R.
2012. 10 Path and place: the lexical specification of granular compatibility. In Motion Encoding in Language and Space, ► pp. 166 ff.
Staden, Miriam van & Bhuvana Narasimhan
2012. 8 Granularity in the cross‐linguistic encoding of motion and location. In Motion Encoding in Language and Space, ► pp. 134 ff.
Suleimanova, Olga A. & Marina A. Fomina
2019. THE ROLE OF SUBJECT IN LINGUISTIC REPRESENTATION OF ITSSTATE OF BEING: THE VERBS STOJAT’, LEZHAT’, SIDET’. Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University (Linguistics) :1 ► pp. 23 ff.
Tutton, Mark
2012. 9 Granularity, space, and motion‐framed location. In Motion Encoding in Language and Space, ► pp. 149 ff.
Valenzuela, Javier, Joseph Hilferty & Oscar Vilarroya
2016. Why are embodied experiments relevant to cognitive linguistics?. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 30 ► pp. 265 ff.
van Bergen, Geertje, Monique Flecken & Rachel Wu
2019. Rapid target selection of object categories based on verbs: Implications for language‐categorization interactions. Psychophysiology 56:9
Vulchanova, Mila, Liliana Martinez & Valentin Vulchanov
2012. 2 Distinctions in the linguistic encoding of motion: evidence from a free naming task. In Motion Encoding in Language and Space, ► pp. 11 ff.
Mila Vulchanova & Emile van der Zee
2012. Motion Encoding in Language and Space,
Winterboer, Andi, Thora Tenbrink & Reinhard Moratz
2012. 5 Spatial directionals for robot navigation. In Motion Encoding in Language and Space, ► pp. 84 ff.
Xiao, Lin
2022. The diachronic evolution of posture verbs in Chinese. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 58:4 ► pp. 933 ff.
Zacks, Jeffrey M. & Barbara Tversky
2012. 7 Granularity in taxonomy, time, and space. In Motion Encoding in Language and Space, ► pp. 122 ff.
Zee, Emile van der & Mila Vulchanova
2012. 1 Introduction. In Motion Encoding in Language and Space, ► pp. 1 ff.
[no author supplied]
2012. Preface. In Motion Encoding in Language and Space, ► pp. vii ff.
[no author supplied]
2012. Copyright Page. In Motion Encoding in Language and Space, ► pp. iv ff.
[no author supplied]
2012. The Contributors. In Motion Encoding in Language and Space, ► pp. viii ff.
[no author supplied]
2012. Abbreviations. In Motion Encoding in Language and Space, ► pp. xii ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.