Part of
Iconicity in Syntax: Proceedings of a symposium on iconicity in syntax, Stanford, June 24–26, 1983Edited by John Haiman
[Typological Studies in Language 6] 1985
► pp. 109–
Edited by John Haiman
[Typological Studies in Language 6] 1985
► pp. 109–
Observations and speculations on subjectivity
Cited by
Cited by 69 other publications
Aldokhayel, Reyadh
2021. Language evolution from a cognitive-grammar perspective. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 19:2 ► pp. 429 ff. 
Biên, Dương Hữu
2023. Vietnamese fictive motion constructions: a construction grammar approach. Cogent Arts & Humanities 10:1
Breivik, Leiv Egil
1997. D. Stein & S. Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: linguistic perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995. Pp. viii + 230. £35, US$54.95, ISBN 0 521 47039 0.. English Language and Linguistics 1:1 ► pp. 199 ff.
BREMS, LIESELOTTE
2010. Size noun constructions as collocationally constrained constructions: lexical and grammaticalized uses. English Language and Linguistics 14:1 ► pp. 83 ff.
Brown, H. Paul
2014. The Grammaticalization of Daimonie at Iliad 24.194. Mnemosyne 67:3 ► pp. 353 ff.
Bu, Jiemin
2016. A semantic study of tense backshift and its literary effects in FID
. Journal of Literary Semantics 45:1 ► pp. 49 ff.
Caldwell, T. Price, Oliver Cresswell & Robert J. Stainton
2018. The Coerciveness of Discourse. In Discourse, Structure and Linguistic Choice [Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, 101], ► pp. 45 ff.
Chen, Peishan & Huhua Ouyang
2022. Support use in Chinese writers’ English argumentative models: Status and linguistic subjectivity. Linguistics and Education 71 ► pp. 101060 ff.
Cornillie, Bert
2006. A Paradigmatic View of Spanish amenazar ‘to threaten’ and prometer ‘to promise’. Folia Linguistica 39:3-4
Crossley, Scott A., Kristopher Kyle & Danielle S. McNamara
2017. Sentiment Analysis and Social Cognition Engine (SEANCE): An automatic tool for sentiment, social cognition, and social-order analysis. Behavior Research Methods 49:3 ► pp. 803 ff.
Dancygier, Barbara
2012. Negation, stance verbs, and intersubjectivity. In Viewpoint in Language, ► pp. 69 ff.
Diewald, Gabriele
Diewald, Gabriele & Katja Politt
2020. Grammatical categories as paradigms in Construction Grammar. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34 ► pp. 42 ff.
Ehret, Katharina & Maite Taboada
2021. The interplay of complexity and subjectivity in opinionated discourse. Discourse Studies 23:2 ► pp. 141 ff.
Gomola, Aleksander
2016. English Evaluative Concepts in a Contemporary Devotional Christian Text. A Comparative Study of Dzienniczek by Faustyna Kowalska and Its English Translation. In Translating Values, ► pp. 123 ff.
Hamawand, Zeki
2007. The construal of objectivity in atemporal complement clauses in English. <i>WORD</i> 58:1-3 ► pp. 159 ff.
He, Qingshun
2014. A Study of the Subjectification of the Chinese Word <i>Suoyi</i>. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics 04:03 ► pp. 399 ff.
Hofmockel, Carolin
HONDA, AKIRA
1994. FROM SPATIAL COGNITION TO SEMANTIC STRUCTURE: THE ROLE OF SUBJECTIVE MOTION IN COGNITION AND LANGUAGE. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 11:0 ► pp. 197 ff.
Hoshi, Saori
2022. Effects of Classroom Instruction on the Development of L2 Interactional Resource for Joint Stance Taking: Use of Japanese Interactional ParticleYoin Spontaneous Peer Conversation. Applied Linguistics 43:4 ► pp. 698 ff.
Houben, Jan E. M.
2008. Pāṇini’s Grammar and Its Computerization: A Construction Grammar Approach. In Sanskrit Computational Linguistics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5406], ► pp. 6 ff.
Hu, Jian
2023. Towards a Constructional Approach to Metaphor of Modality. In A Constructional Approach to Interpersonal Metaphor of Modality [Peking University Linguistics Research, 7], ► pp. 29 ff.
ISHIKAWA, KIYOSHI
2005. Temporal Cognition and Activities by Situated Agents (P. Ludlow, Semantics, Tense and Time: An Essay in the Metaphysics of Natural Language). ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 22:2 ► pp. 443 ff.
Iwasaki, Shin-Ya
2009. A Cognitive Grammar account of time motion ‘metaphors’: A view from Japanese. Cognitive Linguistics 20:2
Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita & Katsunobu Izutsu
Katz, Gilad, Nir Ofek & Bracha Shapira
2015. ConSent: Context-based sentiment analysis. Knowledge-Based Systems 84 ► pp. 162 ff.
KOGA, KEISUKE
1992. A COGNITIVE APPROACH TO DEFINITENESS: FROM SPECIFIC TO GENERIC. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 9:0 ► pp. 152 ff.
Krawczak, Karolina
Langacker, Ronald W.
1986. An Introduction to Cognitive Grammar. Cognitive Science 10:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
LIAMKINA, OLGA & MARIANNA RYSHINA‐PANKOVA
2012. Grammar Dilemma: Teaching Grammar as a Resource for Making Meaning. The Modern Language Journal 96:2 ► pp. 270 ff.
Lin, Lin
2020. Demonstratives. In The German Demonstratives [Peking University Linguistics Research, 2], ► pp. 23 ff.
Lo, Adrienne
2022. Evidentiality and morality in a Korean heritage language school. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 235 ff.
Lu, Wei-lun
2017. Chapter 9. Metaphor, conceptual archetypes and subjectification. In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56], ► pp. 232 ff.
Lu, Wei-lun
2022. A Conceptual Exploration of Polysemy: A Case Study of [V] – [UP] and [V] – [SHANG],
Maldonado, Ricardo & Rocío Guzmán
Nicolle, Steve
2018. Daniel Van Olmen, Hubert Cuyckens & Lobke Ghesquière (eds.) Aspects of grammaticalization:
(Inter)Subjectification and directionality
. Functions of Language 25:3 ► pp. 429 ff.
Pit, Mirna
2006. Determining Subjectivity in Text: The Case of Backward Causal Connectives in Dutch. Discourse Processes 41:2 ► pp. 151 ff.
Robles Gil, Pedro Reygadas
2021. La co-construcción del sentido emocional en la lengua desde una mirada de la complejidad. Revista Mexicana de Orientación Educativa ► pp. 1 ff.
Schmid, Monika S. & Dieter Stein
1996. Subjektivierung in markierter Wortstellung im Englischen. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 26:2 ► pp. 97 ff.
Serrano, María José
2018. Managing subjectivity: Omission and expression of first-person singular object a mí in Spanish media discourse. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 63:3 ► pp. 423 ff.
Serrano, María José
Seržant, Ilja A.
2015. Categorization and semantics of subject-like obliques. In Subjects in Constructions – Canonical and Non-Canonical [Constructional Approaches to Language, 16], ► pp. 175 ff.
Smet, Hendrik De & Jean-Christophe Verstraete
2006. Coming to terms with subjectivity. Cognitive Linguistics 17:3
Song, Jae Jung
1996. From purposive to manner in Korean: A semantic‐pragmatic change of subjectification. Australian Journal of Linguistics 16:2 ► pp. 209 ff.
Sonnenhauser, Barbara
2010. Krause, M.: Epistemische Modalität. Zur Interaktion lexikalischer und prosodischer Marker. Dargestellt am Beispiel des Russischen und des Bosnisch-Kroatisch-Serbischen (Slavistische Studienbücher. Neue Folge, 17), Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2007, 250 pp.. Russian Linguistics 34:2 ► pp. 187 ff.
Stadnik, Katarzyna
2023. Julian of Norwich’s a Revelation of Love: A Grounded Cognition Approach to a Late Medieval Text. Research in Language 21:1 ► pp. 21 ff.
Stoyanova, Antonia
2023. Sensory modality as a linguistic sign of the ‘divided self’ in John Banville’s novels. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 32:2 ► pp. 231 ff.
TANTUCCI, VITTORIO
2015. Epistemic inclination and factualization: a synchronic and diachronic study on the semantic gradience of factuality. Language and Cognition 7:3 ► pp. 371 ff.
Tantucci, Vittorio
2015. Traversativity and grammaticalization. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 6:1 ► pp. 57 ff.
Tantucci, Vittorio
2021. Language and Social Minds,
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2003. From subjectification to intersubjectification. In Motives for Language Change, ► pp. 124 ff.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher
2001. Regularity in Semantic Change,
Tribushinina, Elena
2008. EGO as a cognitive reference point: the case of невысокий and низкий. Russian Linguistics 32:3 ► pp. 159 ff.
Trnavac, Radoslava, Debopam Das & Maite Taboada
2016. Discourse relations and evaluation. Corpora 11:2 ► pp. 169 ff.
Turner, Mark
2017. Multimodal form-meaning pairs for blended classic joint attention. Linguistics Vanguard 3:s1
Turner, Mark
2020. Suggestive Landscape. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 68:4 ► pp. 451 ff.
Turner, Mark
2020. Constructions and creativity. Cognitive Semiotics 13:1
van Schuppen, Linde, Kobie van Krieken & José Sanders
2019. Deictic Navigation Network: Linguistic Viewpoint Disturbances in Schizophrenia. Frontiers in Psychology 10
Vandelanotte, Lieven
2012. “Wait tillyougot started”. In Viewpoint in Language, ► pp. 198 ff.
Wieczorek, Anna E
2015. ‘Look who’s talking now’: A taxonomy of speakers in single-turn political discourse. Discourse Studies 17:3 ► pp. 343 ff.
Wong, May L-Y
Xiao, Hongling, Fang Li, Ted J. M. Sanders & Wilbert P. M. S. Spooren
2021. How subjective are Mandarin reason connectives?. Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學 22:1 ► pp. 166 ff.
Xiong, Xueliang
1998. First person zero anaphor as a cognitive unit in Chinese. <i>WORD</i> 49:3 ► pp. 383 ff.
Ángeles, Patricia & Ricardo Maldonado Soto
2020. Ma propone y però dispone: Algo más que aumento de intensidad. Cuadernos de Filología Italiana 27 ► pp. 31 ff.
[no author supplied]
1998. REFERENCES. In Representation of Cognitive Structures,
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.