Part of
Iconicity in Syntax: Proceedings of a symposium on iconicity in syntax, Stanford, June 24–26, 1983Edited by John Haiman
[Typological Studies in Language 6] 1985
► pp. 109–
Edited by John Haiman
[Typological Studies in Language 6] 1985
► pp. 109–
Observations and speculations on subjectivity
Cited by
Cited by 66 other publications
Aldokhayel, Reyadh
2021. Language evolution from a cognitive-grammar perspective. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 19:2 ► pp. 429 ff. 
Biên, Dương Hữu
2023. Vietnamese fictive motion constructions: a construction grammar approach. Cogent Arts & Humanities 10:1
Breivik, Leiv Egil
1997. D. Stein & S. Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: linguistic perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995. Pp. viii + 230. £35, US$54.95, ISBN 0 521 47039 0.. English Language and Linguistics 1:1 ► pp. 199 ff.
BREMS, LIESELOTTE
2010. Size noun constructions as collocationally constrained constructions: lexical and grammaticalized uses. English Language and Linguistics 14:1 ► pp. 83 ff.
Brown, H. Paul
2014. The Grammaticalization of Daimonie at Iliad 24.194. Mnemosyne 67:3 ► pp. 353 ff.
Bu, Jiemin
2016. A semantic study of tense backshift and its literary effects in FID
. Journal of Literary Semantics 45:1 ► pp. 49 ff.
Caldwell, T. Price, Oliver Cresswell & Robert J. Stainton
2018. The Coerciveness of Discourse. In Discourse, Structure and Linguistic Choice [Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, 101], ► pp. 45 ff.
Chen, Peishan & Huhua Ouyang
2022. Support use in Chinese writers’ English argumentative models: Status and linguistic subjectivity. Linguistics and Education 71 ► pp. 101060 ff.
Cornillie, Bert
2006. A Paradigmatic View of Spanish amenazar ‘to threaten’ and prometer ‘to promise’. Folia Linguistica 39:3-4
Crossley, Scott A., Kristopher Kyle & Danielle S. McNamara
2017. Sentiment Analysis and Social Cognition Engine (SEANCE): An automatic tool for sentiment, social cognition, and social-order analysis. Behavior Research Methods 49:3 ► pp. 803 ff.
Dancygier, Barbara
2012. Negation, stance verbs, and intersubjectivity. In Viewpoint in Language, ► pp. 69 ff.
Diewald, Gabriele
Diewald, Gabriele & Katja Politt
2020. Grammatical categories as paradigms in Construction Grammar. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34 ► pp. 42 ff.
Ehret, Katharina & Maite Taboada
2021. The interplay of complexity and subjectivity in opinionated discourse. Discourse Studies 23:2 ► pp. 141 ff.
Gomola, Aleksander
2016. English Evaluative Concepts in a Contemporary Devotional Christian Text. A Comparative Study of Dzienniczek by Faustyna Kowalska and Its English Translation. In Translating Values, ► pp. 123 ff.
Hamawand, Zeki
2007. The construal of objectivity in atemporal complement clauses in English. <i>WORD</i> 58:1-3 ► pp. 159 ff.
He, Qingshun
2014. A Study of the Subjectification of the Chinese Word <i>Suoyi</i>. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics 04:03 ► pp. 399 ff.
Hofmockel, Carolin
HONDA, AKIRA
1994. FROM SPATIAL COGNITION TO SEMANTIC STRUCTURE: THE ROLE OF SUBJECTIVE MOTION IN COGNITION AND LANGUAGE. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 11:0 ► pp. 197 ff.
Hoshi, Saori
2022. Effects of Classroom Instruction on the Development of L2 Interactional Resource for Joint Stance Taking: Use of Japanese Interactional Particle Yo in Spontaneous Peer Conversation. Applied Linguistics 43:4 ► pp. 698 ff.
Houben, Jan E. M.
2008. Pāṇini’s Grammar and Its Computerization: A Construction Grammar Approach. In Sanskrit Computational Linguistics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5406], ► pp. 6 ff.
ISHIKAWA, KIYOSHI
2005. Temporal Cognition and Activities by Situated Agents (P. Ludlow, Semantics, Tense and Time: An Essay in the Metaphysics of Natural Language). ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 22:2 ► pp. 443 ff.
Iwasaki, Shin-Ya
2009. A Cognitive Grammar account of time motion ‘metaphors’: A view from Japanese. Cognitive Linguistics 20:2
Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita & Katsunobu Izutsu
Katz, Gilad, Nir Ofek & Bracha Shapira
2015. ConSent: Context-based sentiment analysis. Knowledge-Based Systems 84 ► pp. 162 ff.
KOGA, KEISUKE
1992. A COGNITIVE APPROACH TO DEFINITENESS: FROM SPECIFIC TO GENERIC. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 9:0 ► pp. 152 ff.
Krawczak, Karolina
LIAMKINA, OLGA & MARIANNA RYSHINA-PANKOVA
2012. Grammar Dilemma: Teaching Grammar as a Resource for Making Meaning. The Modern Language Journal 96:2 ► pp. 270 ff.
Lin, Lin
2020. Demonstratives. In The German Demonstratives [Peking University Linguistics Research, 2], ► pp. 23 ff.
Lo, Adrienne
2022. Evidentiality and morality in a Korean heritage language school. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 235 ff.
Lu, Wei-lun
2017. Chapter 9. Metaphor, conceptual archetypes and subjectification. In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56], ► pp. 232 ff.
Lu, Wei-lun
2022. A Conceptual Exploration of Polysemy: A Case Study of [V] – [UP] and [V] – [SHANG],
Maldonado, Ricardo & Rocío Guzmán
Nicolle, Steve
2018. Daniel Van Olmen, Hubert Cuyckens & Lobke Ghesquière (eds.) Aspects of grammaticalization:
(Inter)Subjectification and directionality
. Functions of Language 25:3 ► pp. 429 ff.
Pit, Mirna
2006. Determining Subjectivity in Text: The Case of Backward Causal Connectives in Dutch. Discourse Processes 41:2 ► pp. 151 ff.
Robles Gil, Pedro Reygadas
2021. La co-construcción del sentido emocional en la lengua desde una mirada de la complejidad. Revista Mexicana de Orientación Educativa ► pp. 1 ff.
Schmid, Monika S. & Dieter Stein
1996. Subjektivierung in markierter Wortstellung im Englischen. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 26:2 ► pp. 97 ff.
Serrano, María José
2018. Managing subjectivity: Omission and expression of first-person singular object a mí in Spanish media discourse. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 63:3 ► pp. 423 ff.
Serrano, María José
Seržant, Ilja A.
2015. Categorization and semantics of subject-like obliques. In Subjects in Constructions – Canonical and Non-Canonical [Constructional Approaches to Language, 16], ► pp. 175 ff.
Smet, Hendrik De & Jean-Christophe Verstraete
2006. Coming to terms with subjectivity. Cognitive Linguistics 17:3
Song, Jae Jung
1996. From purposive to manner in Korean: A semantic‐pragmatic change of subjectification. Australian Journal of Linguistics 16:2 ► pp. 209 ff.
Sonnenhauser, Barbara
2010. Krause, M.: Epistemische Modalität. Zur Interaktion lexikalischer und prosodischer Marker. Dargestellt am Beispiel des Russischen und des Bosnisch-Kroatisch-Serbischen (Slavistische Studienbücher. Neue Folge, 17), Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2007, 250 pp.. Russian Linguistics 34:2 ► pp. 187 ff.
Stoyanova, Antonia
2023. Sensory modality as a linguistic sign of the ‘divided self’ in John Banville’s novels. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics ► pp. 096394702211477 ff.
TANTUCCI, VITTORIO
2015. Epistemic inclination and factualization: a synchronic and diachronic study on the semantic gradience of factuality. Language and Cognition 7:3 ► pp. 371 ff.
Tantucci, Vittorio
2015. Traversativity and grammaticalization. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 6:1 ► pp. 57 ff.
Tantucci, Vittorio
2021. Language and Social Minds,
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2003. From subjectification to intersubjectification. In Motives for Language Change, ► pp. 124 ff.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher
2001. Regularity in Semantic Change,
Tribushinina, Elena
2008. EGO as a cognitive reference point: the case of невысокий and низкий. Russian Linguistics 32:3 ► pp. 159 ff.
Trnavac, Radoslava, Debopam Das & Maite Taboada
2016. Discourse relations and evaluation. Corpora 11:2 ► pp. 169 ff.
Turner, Mark
2017. Multimodal form-meaning pairs for blended classic joint attention. Linguistics Vanguard 3:s1
Turner, Mark
2020. Suggestive Landscape. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 68:4 ► pp. 451 ff.
Turner, Mark
2020. Constructions and creativity. Cognitive Semiotics 13:1
van Schuppen, Linde, Kobie van Krieken & José Sanders
2019. Deictic Navigation Network: Linguistic Viewpoint Disturbances in Schizophrenia. Frontiers in Psychology 10
Vandelanotte, Lieven
2012. “Wait tillyougot started”. In Viewpoint in Language, ► pp. 198 ff.
Wieczorek, Anna E
2015. ‘Look who’s talking now’: A taxonomy of speakers in single-turn political discourse. Discourse Studies 17:3 ► pp. 343 ff.
Wong, May L-Y
Xiao, Hongling, Fang Li, Ted J. M. Sanders & Wilbert P. M. S. Spooren
2021. How subjective are Mandarin
reason connectives?. Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學 22:1 ► pp. 166 ff.
Xiong, Xueliang
1998. First person zero anaphor as a cognitive unit in Chinese. <i>WORD</i> 49:3 ► pp. 383 ff.
Ángeles, Patricia & Ricardo Maldonado Soto
2020. Ma propone y però dispone: Algo más que aumento de intensidad. Cuadernos de Filología Italiana 27 ► pp. 31 ff.
[no author supplied]
1998. REFERENCES. In Representation of Cognitive Structures,
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.