Part of
Iconicity in Syntax: Proceedings of a symposium on iconicity in syntax, Stanford, June 24–26, 1983Edited by John Haiman
[Typological Studies in Language 6] 1985
► pp. 187–
Edited by John Haiman
[Typological Studies in Language 6] 1985
► pp. 187–
Iconicity, isomorphism, and non-arbitrary coding in syntax
Cited by
Cited by 103 other publications
Allen Harris, Randy
2020. Ploke. Metaphor and Symbol 35:1 ► pp. 23 ff. 
Barth, Danielle
2019. Effects of average and specific context probability on reduction of function words BE and HAVE
. Linguistics Vanguard 5:1
Beni, Majid Davoody
2017. The Code Model of Biosemiotics and the Fate of the Structuralist Theory of Mental Representation. Biosemiotics 10:1 ► pp. 99 ff.
Bouchard, Denis
2005. Exaption and linguistic explanation. Lingua 115:12 ► pp. 1685 ff.
CAMACHO, Roberto Gomes
2017. Alinhamento e estratégias de relativização. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada 33:1 ► pp. 243 ff.
Camacho, Roberto Gomes, Erotilde Goreti Pezatti, Danytiele Cristina Fernandes de Paula & Carolina Cau Sposito Ribeiro de Abreu
2017. Transparência linguística. LIAMES: Línguas Indígenas Americanas 17:2 ► pp. 223 ff.
Campos, Guillermo González & Christian Lehmann
2021. The Cabecar Relative Clause. International Journal of American Linguistics 87:2 ► pp. 243 ff.
Carvalho, Danniel da Silva
2021. SOBRE A DOMESTICAÇÃO DO GÊNERO GRAMATICAL. Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada 60:1 ► pp. 248 ff.
Clarke, Ben
2016. Textual dynamism as a heuristic for a delicate semantic description of ellipsis patterns. English Text Construction 9:1 ► pp. 99 ff.
Croft, William
2002. The Darwinization of Linguistics. Selection 3:1 ► pp. 75 ff.
Cucatto, Mariana
2021. Para mayor satisfacción (de): expresión conectiva plurifuncional, fundamentación y disuasión. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 88 ► pp. 107 ff.
de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José Ruiz
2022. Analogical and Non-analogical Resemblance in Figurative Language: A Cognitive-Linguistic Perspective. In Metaphors and Analogies in Sciences and Humanities [Synthese Library, 453], ► pp. 269 ff.
De Smet, Isabeau & Freek Van de Velde
2020. Semantic differences between strong and weak verb forms in Dutch. Cognitive Linguistics 31:3 ► pp. 393 ff.
Dent, Cathy & Lois Rosenberg
1990. Visual and Verbal Metaphors: Developmental Interactions. Child Development 61:4 ► pp. 983 ff.
Ding, Hongdi
Drozhashchikh, Nataliia
2022. Form-Meaning Systematicity in Old English Alliterative Verse. Neophilologus 106:3 ► pp. 479 ff.
Eslami Rasekh, Abbas, Mansoor Tavakoli, Momene Ghadiri & Reza Zabihi
2013. Investigating the role of context in resolving discourse anaphoric relations: Does text genre variability play a part?. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning 3:1
Fonteyn, Lauren, Hendrik De Smet & Liesbet Heyvaert
2015. What It Means to Verbalize. Journal of English Linguistics 43:1 ► pp. 36 ff.
Futrell, Richard & Michael Hahn
2022. Information Theory as a Bridge Between Language Function and Language Form. Frontiers in Communication 7
Givón, T.
Givón, T.
Gonzálvez-García, Francisco
2018. Taming iconicity in the Spanish and Italian translations of Shakespeare’sSonnets. English Text Construction 11:1 ► pp. 105 ff.
Guido, Maria Grazia
2018. Trauma-Narrative Analysis at the Level of Pragmalinguistic Schemata. In English as a Lingua Franca in Migrants' Trauma Narratives, ► pp. 113 ff.
Hahn, Michael, Rebecca Mathew & Judith Degen
2022. Morpheme Ordering Across Languages Reflects Optimization for Processing Efficiency. Open Mind 5 ► pp. 208 ff.
Hahn, Michael & Yang Xu
2022. Crosslinguistic word order variation reflects evolutionary pressures of dependency and information locality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119:24
Haiman, John
1990. Hagit Borer (ed.), The syntax of pronominal clitics. (Syntax & Semantics, 19.) New York: Academic Press, 1986. Pp. xii + 380.. Journal of Linguistics 26:1 ► pp. 250 ff.
Haspelmath, Martin
2008. Frequency vs. iconicity in explaining grammatical asymmetries. Cognitive Linguistics 19:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Hausser, Roland
2014. Cognitive Foundations of Semantics. In Foundations of Computational Linguistics, ► pp. 45 ff.
Hausser, Roland
2014. Structure and Functioning of Signs. In Foundations of Computational Linguistics, ► pp. 103 ff.
Havu, Jukka & Mikko Höglund
2015. A Cross-Linguistic Perspective on Complementation in the Tough Construction. In Perspectives on Complementation, ► pp. 52 ff.
Hoffmann, Thomas
2014. The cognitive evolution of Englishes. In The Evolution of Englishes [Varieties of English Around the World, G49], ► pp. 160 ff.
HOFFMANN, THOMAS
2017. Construction Grammar as Cognitive Structuralism: the interaction of constructional networks and processing in the diachronic evolution of English comparative correlatives. English Language and Linguistics 21:2 ► pp. 349 ff.
Hoffmann, Thomas
2019. English Comparative Correlatives,
Hoffmann, Thomas
2021. The Cognitive Foundation of Post-colonial Englishes,
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2003. Grammaticalization,
Huang, Yan
1991. A neo-Gricean pragmatic theory of anaphora. Journal of Linguistics 27:2 ► pp. 301 ff.
Höglund, Mikko
2018. Complementation of ashamed – diachrony and determinants of variation. In Changing Structures [Studies in Language Companion Series, 195], ► pp. 89 ff.
Iza Erviti, Aneider
2021. Complementary Contrastive Constructions. In Discourse Constructions in English [Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, ], ► pp. 75 ff.
Jing-Schmidt, Zhuo
2010. Review of Gilquin (2010): Corpus, cognition and causative constructions. Studies in Language 34:4 ► pp. 922 ff.
Karrebæk, Martha Sif
2003. Iconicity and structure in codeswitching. International Journal of Bilingualism 7:4 ► pp. 407 ff.
Kazzazi, Kerstin
2011. Ich brauche mix-cough: cross-linguistic influence involving German, English and Farsi. International Journal of Multilingualism 8:1 ► pp. 63 ff.
Kendon, Adam
2017. Reflections on the “gesture-first” hypothesis of language origins. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 24:1 ► pp. 163 ff.
Kendon, Adam
Kim, Soung-U
2019. The Morphosyntax of Jejuan –ko Clause Linkages. Lanaguage Research 55:2 ► pp. 315 ff.
Kocab, Annemarie, Jayden Ziegler & Jesse Snedeker
2019. It takes a village: The role of community size in linguistic regularization. Cognitive Psychology 114 ► pp. 101227 ff.
Krivochen, Diego Gabriel & Ľudmila Lacková
2020. Iconicity in syntax and the architecture of linguistic theory. Studies in Language 44:1 ► pp. 95 ff.
Levy, Elena T. & David McNeill
1992. Speech, gesture, and discourse. Discourse Processes 15:3 ► pp. 277 ff.
Lu, Wei-lun
2020. Narrative viewpoint and subjective construal across languages. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 7:2 ► pp. 334 ff.
McNeill, David
McNeill, David & Elena T. Levy
1993. Cohesion and gesture. Discourse Processes 16:4 ► pp. 363 ff.
Mcneill, David, Elena T. Levy & Susan D. Duncan
2015. Gesture in Discourse. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ► pp. 262 ff.
Torjus Midtgarden
2002. Iconic aspects of language and language use: Peirces work on
iconicity revisited. semi 2002:139 ► pp. 227 ff.
Mittelberg, Irene
2017. Multimodal existential constructions in German: Manual actions of giving as experiential substrate for grammatical and gestural patterns. Linguistics Vanguard 3:s1
Nakano, Yukiko I., Masashi Okamoto & Toyoaki Nishida
2005. Enriching Agent Animations with Gestures and Highlighting Effects. In Intelligent Media Technology for Communicative Intelligence [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3490], ► pp. 91 ff.
Narrog, Heiko
2010. The order of meaningful elements in the Japanese verbal complex. Morphology 20:1 ► pp. 205 ff.
Narrog, Heiko
2020. Chapter 3. The scope of modal categories. In Re-Assessing Modalising Expressions [Studies in Language Companion Series, 216], ► pp. 47 ff.
Nir, Bracha
Nuckolls, Janis B.
1999. The Case for Sound Symbolism. Annual Review of Anthropology 28:1 ► pp. 225 ff.
Occhino, Corrine, Benjamin Anible, Erin Wilkinson & Jill P. Morford
Perlman, Marcus, Hannah Little, Bill Thompson & Robin L. Thompson
2018. Iconicity in Signed and Spoken Vocabulary: A Comparison Between American Sign Language, British Sign Language, English, and Spanish. Frontiers in Psychology 9
Perlman, Marcus & Gary Lupyan
2018. People Can Create Iconic Vocalizations to Communicate Various Meanings to Naïve Listeners. Scientific Reports 8:1
Rainer, Franz, Wolfgang U. Dressler, Francesco Gardani & Hans Christian Luschützky
2014. Morphology and meaning: An overview. In Morphology and Meaning [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 327], ► pp. 3 ff.
Rohrer, Patrick Louis, Júlia Florit-Pons, Ingrid Vilà-Giménez & Pilar Prieto
2022. Children Use Non-referential Gestures in Narrative Speech to Mark Discourse Elements Which Update Common Ground. Frontiers in Psychology 12
Romasanta, Raquel P.
2021. A morphosyntactic approach to language contact in African varieties of English. Studia Neophilologica ► pp. 1 ff.
Romasanta, Raquel P.
2021. Substrate Language Influence in Postcolonial Asian Englishes and the Role of Transfer in the Complementation System. English Studies 102:8 ► pp. 1151 ff.
ROMASANTA, RAQUEL P.
2022. Negation as a predictor of clausal complement choice in World Englishes. English Language and Linguistics 26:2 ► pp. 307 ff.
Rupp, Laura & David Britain
2019. Introduction. In Linguistic Perspectives on a Variable English Morpheme, ► pp. 1 ff.
Rupp, Laura & David Britain
2019. Verbal –s. In Linguistic Perspectives on a Variable English Morpheme, ► pp. 25 ff.
Scholman, Merel C. J., Liam Blything, Kate Cain, Jet Hoek & Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul
2022. Discourse rules: the effects of clause order principles on the reading process. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 37:10 ► pp. 1277 ff.
Sicoli, Mark A, Tanya Stivers, NJ Enfield & Stephen C Levinson
2015. Marked Initial Pitch in Questions Signals Marked Communicative Function. Language and Speech 58:2 ► pp. 204 ff.
So, Wing Chee, Sotaro Kita & Susan Goldin-Meadow
2013. When Do Speakers Use Gestures to Specify Who Does What to Whom? The Role of Language Proficiency and Type of Gestures in Narratives. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 42:6 ► pp. 581 ff.
Sohn, Ho-min
TOMOZAWA, HIROTAKA
2012. COORDINATION AND FUNCTIONAL REDUNDANCY: THE CASE OF ADJECTIVES OF TEMPORAL ORDERING. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 29:1 ► pp. 88 ff.
Uljas, Sami
2021. Iconicity and Semantic-Structural Mapping in Earlier Egyptian Complementation. Lingua Aegyptia - Journal of Egyptian Language Studies :29 ► pp. 215 ff.
van Hout, Roeland & Pieter Muysken
2016. Taming Chaos. Chance and Variability in the Language Sciences. In The Challenge of Chance [The Frontiers Collection, ], ► pp. 249 ff.
Versluis, Christine & Lou-Ann Kleppa
2016. The use of interactive structures as communicative strategy in Dutch and Portuguese aphasic speakers. In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55], ► pp. 323 ff.
Vesterinen, Rainer
2008. Complementos finitos e infinitivos dos verbos causativosdeixarefazer– Causação directa vs. indirecta e a noção de controlo. Studia Neophilologica 80:1 ► pp. 75 ff.
Vesterinen, Rainer
2012. Control and dominion: Factivity and mood choice in Spanish. Language and Cognition 4:1 ► pp. 43 ff.
Warkentin, Germaine
2017. Reading the ‘Cheyenne Letter’: Towards a Typology of Inscription beyond the Alphabet. In Approaches to the History of Written Culture, ► pp. 139 ff.
Wenz, Karin
1996. Iconicity in verbal descriptions of space. In The Construal of Space in Language and Thought, ► pp. 269 ff.
Wilkinson, Ray, Suzanne Beeke & Jane Maxim
2010. Formulating Actions and Events With Limited Linguistic Resources: Enactment and Iconicity in Agrammatic Aphasic Talk. Research on Language & Social Interaction 43:1 ► pp. 57 ff.
Xiao, Wei, Li Li & Jin Liu
2023. To Move or Not to Move: An Entropy-based Approach to the Informativeness of Research Article Abstracts across Disciplines. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 30:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Xiong, Xueliang
1998. First person zero anaphor as a cognitive unit in Chinese. <i>WORD</i> 49:3 ► pp. 383 ff.
Yau, Shun-chiu
2008. The Role of Visual Space in Sign Language Development. In Space in Languages of China, ► pp. 143 ff.
Ye, Zhengdao
2019. The Emergence of Expressible Agency and Irony in Today’s China: A Semantic Explanation of the New Bèi-construction. Australian Journal of Linguistics 39:1 ► pp. 57 ff.
Петрова , Инна Михайловна
2020. Нарушение иконичности языкового знака как показатель изменения когнитивного фокуса (на материале английского языка). ГУМАНИТАРНЫЕ НАУКИ :№12/3 ► pp. 119 ff.
黄, 琪
2021. Iconicity Analysis of English Middle Voice. Modern Linguistics 09:06 ► pp. 1635 ff.
[no author supplied]
2003. Principles of grammaticalization and linguistic reality. In Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English, ► pp. 445 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 3. Cognitive models. In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45], ► pp. 59 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 5. Content operations across levels of representation. In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45], ► pp. 147 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 2. Theoretical pre-requisites. In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45], ► pp. 17 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 4. Cognitive operations. In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45], ► pp. 85 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
2017. Literatur. In Nicht-ikonische Chronologie, ► pp. 286 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.