Article published in:Rethinking Grammaticalization: New perspectives
Edited by María José López-Couso and Elena Seoane
[Typological Studies in Language 76] 2008
► pp. 239–264
On the rise and fall of Korean nominalizers
This paper addresses the origin and development of the system of Korean nominalizers from Old to Present-day Korean, paying special attention to their sources, the semantic changes they underwent over time, the competition between various nominalizers for the same functional domain, and the subsequent specialization of some of the forms. The study shows that, in order to avoid functional overlaps, certain nominalizers have become constrained to appear in particular contexts (e.g. -ki and -ci, restricted to affirmative and negative constructions respectively) or to express different levels of illocutionary force (e.g. -m, -ki, -ci and -kes when used as sentential end-markers). The paper also shows how certain nominalizers which overlapped functionally lost their original nominalizing function and acquired new uses in related functional spaces (e.g. the adnominalizers -n and -l, derived from old nominalizers).
Published online: 09 July 2008
Cited by 6 other publications
Ahn, Mikyung & Foong Ha Yap
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
Yap, Foong Ha, Yi Deng & Marco Caboara
Yap, Foong Ha & Karen Grunow-Hårsta
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 may 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.