Cited by

Cited by 17 other publications

AMBRIDGE, BEN, EVAN KIDD, CAROLINE F. ROWLAND & ANNA L. THEAKSTON
2015. The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 42:2  pp. 239 ff. DOI logo
CHEN, JIDONG & YASUHIRO SHIRAI
2015. The acquisition of relative clauses in spontaneous child speech in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Child Language 42:2  pp. 394 ff. DOI logo
Diessel, Holger
2019. The Grammar Network, DOI logo
Guz, Wojciech
2023. Presentational relative clauses introduced byżein Polish. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 68:2  pp. 307 ff. DOI logo
Kidd, Evan
2015. Incorporating learning into theories of parsing. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 5:4  pp. 487 ff. DOI logo
KIM, CHAE-EUN & WILLIAM O'GRADY
2016. Asymmetries in children's production of relative clauses: data from English and Korean. Journal of Child Language 43:5  pp. 1038 ff. DOI logo
KIRJAVAINEN, MINNA, EVAN KIDD & ELENA LIEVEN
2017. How do language-specific characteristics affect the acquisition of different relative clause types? Evidence from Finnish. Journal of Child Language 44:1  pp. 120 ff. DOI logo
Levshina, Natalia, Savithry Namboodiripad, Marc Allassonnière-Tang, Mathew Kramer, Luigi Talamo, Annemarie Verkerk, Sasha Wilmoth, Gabriela Garrido Rodriguez, Timothy Michael Gupton, Evan Kidd, Zoey Liu, Chiara Naccarato, Rachel Nordlinger, Anastasia Panova & Natalia Stoynova
2023. Why we need a gradient approach to word order. Linguistics 61:4  pp. 825 ff. DOI logo
Llompart, Miquel & Ewa Dąbrowska
2024. Explicit instruction improves the comprehension of Spanish object relatives by young monolingual children. Language and Cognition  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Mateu, Victoria & Nina Hyams
2021. Structural intervention effects in the acquisition of sluicing. Language Acquisition 28:1  pp. 6 ff. DOI logo
Montag, Jessica L., Michael N. Jones & Linda B. Smith
2018. Quantity and Diversity: Simulating Early Word Learning Environments. Cognitive Science 42:S2  pp. 375 ff. DOI logo
Reali, Florencia
2014. Frequency Affects Object Relative Clause Processing: Some Evidence in Favor of Usage‐Based Accounts. Language Learning 64:3  pp. 685 ff. DOI logo
Rezaeian, Mehrdad, Firooz Sadighi, Mortaza Yamini & Mohammad Sadegh Bagheri
2018. The role of animacy and language proficiency in the comprehension of English restrictive relative clauses by Iranian EFL learners: an emergentist approach. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education 3:1 DOI logo
Sanfelici, Emanuela & Petra Schulz
2021. Can Frequency Account for the Grammatical Choices of Children and Adults in Nominal Modification Contexts? Evidence from Elicited Production and Child-Directed Speech. Languages 6:1  pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Shenoy, Swathi & Sudhin Karuppali
2021. Determining the development of syntax in typically-developing Indian adolescents using a syntactic analysis package. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health 33:1 DOI logo
Suárez-Gómez, Cristina
2017. Transparency and language contact in the nativization of relative clauses in New Englishes. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 38:2  pp. 211 ff. DOI logo
Tsoi, Elaine Yee Ling, Wenchun Yang, Angel Chan & Evan Kidd
2019. Mandarin–English speaking bilingual and Mandarin speaking monolingual children’s comprehension of relative clauses. Applied Psycholinguistics 40:4  pp. 933 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.