On the role of frequency and similarity in the acquisition of subject and non-subject relative clauses

Holger Diessel | University of Jena

Frequency and similarity are important determinants for the acquisition of children’s early item-based constructions. This paper argues that frequency and similarity are equally important for the development of more complex and intricate grammatical phenomena such as relative clauses. Specifically, the paper shows that the acquisition of relative clauses is crucially determined by the similarity between particular types of relative clauses and simple SVO constructions. Two specific hypotheses are proposed: First, since subject relatives have the same word order as ordinary SVO clauses, they usually cause fewer difficulties in comprehension studies than non-subject relatives. Second, while non-subject relatives are structurally distinct from SVO clauses, semantically they are expressed by prototypical transitive constructions, which arguably helps the child to learn this type of relative clause.

Published online: 22 April 2009
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.85.11ont

Cited by

Cited by 14 other publications

AMBRIDGE, BEN, EVAN KIDD, CAROLINE F. ROWLAND & ANNA L. THEAKSTON

2015. The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 42:2 ► pp. 239 ff.

CHEN, JIDONG & YASUHIRO SHIRAI

2015. The acquisition of relative clauses in spontaneous child speech in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Child Language 42:2 ► pp. 394 ff.

Diessel, Holger

2019. In The Grammar Network,

Kidd, Evan

2015. Incorporating learning into theories of parsing. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 5:4 ► pp. 487 ff.

KIM, CHAE-EUN & WILLIAM O'GRADY

2016. Asymmetries in children's production of relative clauses: data from English and Korean. Journal of Child Language 43:5 ► pp. 1038 ff.

KIRJAVAINEN, MINNA, EVAN KIDD & ELENA LIEVEN

2017. How do language-specific characteristics affect the acquisition of different relative clause types? Evidence from Finnish. Journal of Child Language 44:1 ► pp. 120 ff.

Mateu, Victoria & Nina Hyams

2021. Structural intervention effects in the acquisition of sluicing. Language Acquisition 28:1 ► pp. 6 ff.

Montag, Jessica L., Michael N. Jones & Linda B. Smith

2018. Quantity and Diversity: Simulating Early Word Learning Environments. Cognitive Science 42:S2 ► pp. 375 ff.

Reali, Florencia

2014. Frequency Affects Object Relative Clause Processing: Some Evidence in Favor of Usage-Based Accounts. Language Learning 64:3 ► pp. 685 ff.

Rezaeian, Mehrdad, Firooz Sadighi, Mortaza Yamini & Mohammad Sadegh Bagheri

2018. The role of animacy and language proficiency in the comprehension of English restrictive relative clauses by Iranian EFL learners: an emergentist approach. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education 3:1

Sanfelici, Emanuela & Petra Schulz

2021. Can Frequency Account for the Grammatical Choices of Children and Adults in Nominal Modification Contexts? Evidence from Elicited Production and Child-Directed Speech. Languages 6:1 ► pp. 35 ff.

Shenoy, Swathi & Sudhin Karuppali

2021. Determining the development of syntax in typically-developing Indian adolescents using a syntactic analysis package. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health 33:1

Suárez-Gómez, Cristina

2017. Transparency and language contact in the nativization of relative clauses in New Englishes. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 38:2 ► pp. 211 ff.

Tsoi, Elaine Yee Ling, Wenchun Yang, Angel Chan & Evan Kidd

2019. Mandarin–English speaking bilingual and Mandarin speaking monolingual children’s comprehension of relative clauses. Applied Psycholinguistics 40:4 ► pp. 933 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 july 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.