Two instances of grammaticalization are examined that illustrate the gradual character of change and the categorial ambivalence of grammaticalizing items. The first change is the development of the subject marker for in the English for...to-infinitive, whose expansion into new grammatical environments is shown to be steered by the historically related but syntactically distinct preposition for. The second change is the semantic and collocational development of the phrasal verb particles out and forth, which are argued to have influenced each other’s trajectory of change. Both case studies show how grammaticalization processes can be guided by connections between grammaticalizing elements and other elements in the grammar. It is proposed that such connections form the substance of gradience and can be successfully described and explained in a constructionist and connectionist model of language. This interpretation of gradience in turn can shed light on some of the sub-processes (persistence, decategorialization, paradigmaticization) and motivations of grammaticalization.
2012. A usage-based analysis of phrasal verbs in Early and Late Modern English. English Language and Linguistics 16:2 ► pp. 241 ff.
Leone, Ljubica
2022. The particle forth during the Early Modern English period: linguistic interferences with the particles on and out. Studia Neophilologica► pp. 1 ff.
Mofidi, Roohollah & Peter Petré
2022. Aspectual marking from a typologically uncommon origin: a quantitative account of the development of hamē(w) in Middle Persian. Folia Linguistica 56:s43-s1 ► pp. 97 ff.
Mofidi, Roohollah & Peter Petré
2022. Aspectual marking from a typologically uncommon origin: a quantitative account of the development of hamē(w) in Middle Persian. Folia Linguistica 0:0
Narrog, Heiko & Bernd Heine
2017. Grammaticalization. In The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Syntax, ► pp. 7 ff.
Rodríguez-Puente, Paula
2019. The English Phrasal Verb, 1650–Present,
RODRÍGUEZ-PUENTE, PAULA & MARÍA OBAYA-CUELI
2022. Phrasal verbs in Early Modern English spoken language: a colloquialization conspiracy?. English Language and Linguistics 26:4 ► pp. 807 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.