This paper offers a partial taxonomy of changes of category (word class), exemplified with recent English data. The paper takes as its starting point a structuralist syntax which employs constituent structure and conventional category labels but which lacks empty categories or elaborate functional structure. No fixed, universal inventory of categories is assumed. Three types of category change are distinguished: those where only the affected node and its phrasal projection change labels; those where the topology of the syntactic tree is altered as well; and those where a wholly new category enters the grammar. Most but not all of the examples of category change involve grammaticalization. There is evidence of gradience, and semantics may lead syntax. A distinction is drawn between ambiguous and equivocal syntax, where the latter is under-determined. I suggest that WYSIWYTCH (‘What you see is what your theory can handle’) militates against the recognition of syntactically equivocal strings, and I conclude that for handling grammatical change of the kind surveyed, a rigidly structuralist syntax may turn out to be unrevealing.
2018. Bateau phare, magasin phare : composés [N 1 N 2 ] N et séquences syntaxiques N 1 +N 2 à N 2 adjectivé. Travaux de linguistique n° 76:1 ► pp. 7 ff.
Breban, Tine
2010. Is there a postdeterminer in the English noun phrase?1. Transactions of the Philological Society 108:3 ► pp. 248 ff.
Breban, Tine & Caroline Gentens
2016. Multipleshifts. Functions of Language 23:1 ► pp. 40 ff.
2013. Subjectivity, indefiniteness and semantic change. English Language and Linguistics 17:1 ► pp. 157 ff.
[no author supplied]
2013. Reference Guide for Varieties of English. In A Dictionary of Varieties of English, ► pp. 363 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.