Benefactives and Malefactives
Typological perspectives and case studies
Editors
Benefactives are constructions used to express that a state of affairs holds to someone’s advantage. The same construction sometimes also serves as a malefactive, whose meanings are generally not a simple mirror image of the benefactive. Benefactive constructions cover a wide range of phenomena: malefactive passives, general and specialized benefactive cases and adpositions, serial verb constructions and converbal constructions (including e.g. verbs of giving and taking), benefactive applicatives, and other morphosyntactic strategies. The present book is the first collection of its kind to be published on this topic. It includes both typological surveys and in-depth descriptive studies, exploring both the morphosyntactic properties and the semantic nuances of phenomena ranging from the familiar English double-object construction and the Japanese adversative passive to comparable phenomena found in lesser-known languages of Africa, Asia, and the Americas. The book will appeal to typologists and linguists interested in linguistic diversity and it will also be a useful reference work for linguists working on language description.
[Typological Studies in Language, 92] 2010. x, 440 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Preface | p. vii
-
List of contributors | pp. ix–x
-
Introduction: Benefaction and malefaction from a cross-linguistic perspectiveSeppo Kittilä and Fernando Zúñiga | pp. 1–28
-
Benefactive applicative periphrases: A typological approachDenis Creissels | pp. 29–70
-
Cross-linguistic categorization of benefactives by event structure: A preliminary framework for benefactive typologyTomoko Yamashita Smith | pp. 71–96
-
An areal and cross-linguistic study of benefactive and malefactive constructionsPaula Radetzky and Tomoko Yamashita Smith | pp. 97–120
-
The role of benefactives and related notions in the typology of purpose clausesKarsten Schmidtke-Bode | pp. 121–146
-
Benefactive and malefactive uses of Salish applicativesKaoru Kiyosawa and Donna B. Gerdts | pp. 147–184
-
Beneficiaries and recipients in Toba (Guaycurú)Marisa Censabella | pp. 185–202
-
Benefactive and malefactive applicativization in MapudungunFernando Zúñiga | pp. 203–218
-
The benefactive semantic potential of ‘caused reception’ constructions: A case study of English, German, French, and DutchTimothy Colleman | pp. 219–244
-
Beneficiary coding in FinnishSeppo Kittilä | pp. 245–270
-
Benefactives in LazRené Lacroix | pp. 271–294
-
Benefactive and malefactive verb extensions in the Koalib very systemNicolas Quint | pp. 295–316
-
Benefactives and malefactives in Gumer (Gurage)Sascha Völlmin | pp. 317–330
-
A “reflexive benefactive” in Chamba-Daka (Adamawa branch, Niger-Congo family)Raymond Boyd | pp. 331–350
-
Beneficiary and other roles of the dative in TashelhiytChristian J. Rapold | pp. 351–376
-
Benefactive strategies in ThaiMathias Jenny | pp. 377–392
-
Korean benefactive particles and their meaningsJae Jung Song | pp. 393–418
-
Malefactivity in JapaneseEijiro Tsuboi | pp. 419–436
-
Index | pp. 437–440
“The best test for a volume of this type - a volume that aims to provide a range of discussions and insights into a particular semantic domain - is whether it helps the reader to learn or think about languages that they are already familiar with. Does it make interesting observations about the semantic domain that could be tested in other languages? Does it raise questions or provide implications about the nature of languages more generally? In my view, this book certainly passes this test. I have drawn from it many useful observations to add to my 'language description toolbox', and I have no doubt other readers will do likewise.”
Rachel Nordlinger, University of Melbourne, in Studies in Language Vol. 35:3 (2011), pag. 927-934
Cited by (29)
Cited by 29 other publications
Everdell, Michael & Gabriela García Salido
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
Bowers, Jack
Coler, Matt, Bertie Kaal & Edwin Banegas-Flores
Cúneo, Paola & Cristina Messineo
Danielsen, Swintha & Lena Terhart
Facundes, Sidi, Marília Freitas & Bruna Fernanda Lima-Padovani
Fleck, David W.
Hasler, Felipe, Mariana Poblete, Consuelo Sandoval, Felipe Neira, Daniela Aristegui & Ricardo Pineda
Labrada, Jorge Emilio Rosés
Lehmann, Christian
Mithun, Marianne
Nercesian, Verónica & Alejandra Vidal
Silva, W. D. L.
Valenzuela, Pilar M.
Zariquiey, Roberto, Jaime Montoya, Juana Ticona, Luz Carhuachín, Yessica Reyes, Roxana Quispe-Collantes, José Paz & Aarón Torres
Zariquiey, Roberto & Pilar M. Valenzuela
Zariquiey, Roberto & Pilar M. Valenzuela
JERRO, KYLE
Busso, Lucia, Alessandro Lenci & Florent Perek
Long, Haiping
2018. On the Formation of Modern Chinese Pseudo-Possessive-Object Constructions. Studies in Language 42:2 ► pp. 297 ff.
Bar-Asher Siegal, Elitzur A. & Nora Boneh
Jacques, Guillaume
2015. The spontaneous-autobenefactive prefix in Japhug Rgyalrong. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 38:2 ► pp. 271 ff.
Luraghi, Silvia
2014. Plotting diachronic semantic maps. In Perspectives on Semantic Roles [Typological Studies in Language, 106], ► pp. 99 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Main BIC Subject
CFK: Grammar, syntax
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General