Article published in:
Benefactives and Malefactives: Typological perspectives and case studies
Edited by Fernando Zúñiga and Seppo Kittilä
[Typological Studies in Language 92] 2010
► pp. 128
Cited by

Cited by 10 other publications

No author info given
2022.  In Cantonese GIVE and Double-Object Construction [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 15], Crossref logo
Brosig, Benjamin
2021. Expressing intent, imminence and ire by attributing speech/thought in Mongolian. Folia Linguistica 0:0 Crossref logo
Brosig, Benjamin
2021. Expressing intent, imminence and ire by attributing speech/thought in Mongolian. Folia Linguistica 55:2  pp. 433 ff. Crossref logo
de Kind, Jasper & Koen Bostoen
2012. The applicative in ciLubà grammar and discourse: A semantic goal analysis. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 30:1  pp. 101 ff. Crossref logo
Lai, Yik-Po
2020. Multiple functions of the Cantonese ‘wait’ verb dang2 and their historical development. Studies in Language 44:4  pp. 917 ff. Crossref logo
Lee, Duck-Young & Naomi Ogi
2017.  In Imperatives and Directive Strategies [Studies in Language Companion Series, 184], Crossref logo
Lin, Huei-Ling
2022. Benefactive and malefactive constructions in Taiwan Southern Min. Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學  pp. 209 ff. Crossref logo
Luraghi, Silvia
2016. The dative of agent in Indo-European languages. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 69:1  pp. 15 ff. Crossref logo
Messerschmidt, Maria
2022. Increasing the valency of motion verbs: the case of the portative construction. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 75:1  pp. 161 ff. Crossref logo
Paszenda, Joanna
2017.  In Constructing Families of Constructions [Human Cognitive Processing, 58],  pp. 241 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 june 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.