Introduction

Benefaction and malefaction from a cross-linguistic perspective

Seppo Kittilä | University of Helsinki

Fernando Zúñiga | University of Zurich

Published online: 14 April 2010
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.92.01kit

Cited by

Cited by 10 other publications

No author info given

2022. In Cantonese GIVE and Double-Object Construction [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 15],

Brosig, Benjamin

2021. Expressing intent, imminence and ire by attributing speech/thought in Mongolian. Folia Linguistica 0:0

Brosig, Benjamin

2021. Expressing intent, imminence and ire by attributing speech/thought in Mongolian. Folia Linguistica 55:2 ► pp. 433 ff.

de Kind, Jasper & Koen Bostoen

2012. The applicative in ciLubà grammar and discourse: A semantic goal analysis. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 30:1 ► pp. 101 ff.

Lai, Yik-Po

2020. Multiple functions of the Cantonese ‘wait’ verb dang2 and their historical development. Studies in Language 44:4 ► pp. 917 ff.

Lee, Duck-Young & Naomi Ogi

2017. In Imperatives and Directive Strategies [Studies in Language Companion Series, 184],

Lin, Huei-Ling

2022. Benefactive and malefactive constructions in Taiwan Southern Min. Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學 ► pp. 209 ff.

Luraghi, Silvia

2016. The dative of agent in Indo-European languages. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 69:1 ► pp. 15 ff.

Messerschmidt, Maria

2022. Increasing the valency of motion verbs: the case of the portative construction. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 75:1 ► pp. 161 ff.

Paszenda, Joanna

2017. In Constructing Families of Constructions [Human Cognitive Processing, 58], ► pp. 241 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 june 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.