Part of
Case, Animacy and Semantic RolesEdited by Seppo Kittilä, Katja Västi and Jussi Ylikoski
[Typological Studies in Language 99] 2011
► pp. 207–234
Edited by Seppo Kittilä, Katja Västi and Jussi Ylikoski
[Typological Studies in Language 99] 2011
► pp. 207–234
The coding of spatial relations with human landmarks
From Latin to Romance
The paper discusses the coding of location and direction with respect to human entities, and analyzes the change undergone by the Latin coding system with its outcomes in the Romance languages. Latin features different coding strategies depending on whether location and direction relate to the interior of a landmark or to its vicinity; the former were used with inanimate landmarks, while the latter could be used with both inanimate and animate (human) ones. Most Romance languages do not continue this opposition. As a consequence, coding strategies for space expressions with human landmarks across the Romance languages display different patterns, which are described and discussed in the paper.
Cited by (12)
Cited by 12 other publications
Ursini, Francesco-Alessio & Tong Wu
2024. On Italian spatial prepositions and measure phrases: reconciling the data with theoretical accounts. Linguistics 62:2 ► pp. 491 ff. 
Franco, Ludovico, M. Rita Manzini & Leonardo M. Savoia
Ursini, Francesco-Alessio
2021. General location across languages: On the division of labour between functional and lexical items in spatial categories. The Linguistic Review 37:4 ► pp. 495 ff.
Melis, Chantal
2020. Form and meaning in the development of verbal polysemy. In Changes in Meaning and Function [IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature, 25], ► pp. 174 ff.
Haspelmath, Martin
2019. Differential place marking and differential object marking. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 72:3 ► pp. 313 ff.
Krohn, Haakon S.
2018. La polisemia de la posposición ã en bribri. Forma y Función 31:1 ► pp. 125 ff.
Brucale, Luisa & Egle Mocciaro
2017. Asymmetries in path encoding in Sicilian. In Space in Diachrony [Studies in Language Companion Series, 188], ► pp. 281 ff.
Iacobini, Claudio, Luisa Corona, Noemi De Pasquale & Alfonsina Buoniconto
2017. How should a “classical” Satellite-Framed Language behave?. In Space in Diachrony [Studies in Language Companion Series, 188], ► pp. 95 ff.
Luraghi, Silvia
2017. Differential Goal marking vs. differential Source marking in Ancient Greek. In Space in Diachrony [Studies in Language Companion Series, 188], ► pp. 119 ff.
Nikitina, Tatiana
2017. Ablative and allative marking of static locations. In Space in Diachrony [Studies in Language Companion Series, 188], ► pp. 67 ff.
Kittilä, Seppo
2014. The (non-)prototypicality of Direction. In Perspectives on Semantic Roles [Typological Studies in Language, 106], ► pp. 151 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.