Cover not available
Article published In:
Translation and Translanguaging in Multilingual Contexts
Vol. 8:2 (2022) ► pp.101–113

The name and nature of translation studies

A reappraisal

| University of Leeds
| University of Leeds

James Stratton Holmes (Iowa, 1924 – Amsterdam, 1986) is known as both a major translator/editor of poetry from Dutch (Brems and McMartin 2020, 2021) and as a teacher and researcher of translation, whose professional career was centred in the Netherlands at the University of Amsterdam. He has had a long-lasting influence on the development of the field of translation as an academic subject with his landmark essay “The Name and Nature of Translation Studies”. First presented at a 1972 conference in Copenhagen, it is “generally regarded as the founding statement of the discipline” (Gentzler 2001, 93). Yet, fifty years on, how valid is that essay in today’s context? We present a review and reappraisal of the essay in the context of Holmes’ academic work as a whole and we raise a few questions about the future and history of the discipline.

Keywords: Translation Studies, theory of translation, James S. Holmes, the name and nature of translation studies
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The Translated! volume and the Holmes Group
    • 2.1The name of the discipline
    • 2.2The nature of Translation Studies
  • 3.Relevance for today
  • References
Published online: 5 July 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ttmc.00089.mun
References
Bassnett, Susan
1980 Translation Studies. 1st ed. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Bassnett, Susan, and David Johnston
2019 “The Outward Turn in Translation Studies.” The Translator 25 (1): 181–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brems, Elke, and Jack McMartin
2021 “The Voices of James Stratton Holmes.” In Literary Translator Studies, ed. by Klaus Kaindl, Waltraud Kolb, and Daniel Schlager, 249–264. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020 “The Polyphony of Periodicals: James S. Holmes and Delta .” In Literary Translation in Periodicals: Methodological Challenges for a Transnational Approach, ed. by Laura Fólica, Daniela Roig-Sanz, and Stefania Caristia, 331–346. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Broeck, Raymond van den
1988 “Introduction.” In Translated! by James S. Holmes, 1–5. Amsterdam: Editions Rodopi B.V.Google Scholar
Brower, Reuben A.
ed. 1958 On Translation. Cambridge MA: Harvard.Google Scholar
Chesterman, Andrew
2009 The Name and Nature of Translator Studies. Hermes: The Journal of Language and Communication in Business 22 (42): 13–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021 “Translator Studies.” In Handbook of Translation Studies, Vol. 51, ed. by Yves Gambier, and Luc van Doorslaer, 241–246. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Even-Zohar, Itamar
1978 Papers in Historical Poetics. Tel Aviv: The Porter Institute.Google Scholar
Gentzler, Edwin
2001 Contemporary Translation Theories. Revised ed. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Harris, Brian
2011 “Origins and Conceptual Analysis of the term Traductologie .” Babel 57 (1): 15–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hermans, Theo
ed. 1985 The Manipulation of Literature. 1st ed. Beckenham: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Holmes, James S.
1988 Translated! Papers on Literary Translation and Translation Studies. 1st ed. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Holmes, James S., José Lambert, and Raymond van den Broeck
eds. 1978 Literature and Translation. Leuven: Academic Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Leuven-Zwart, Kitty M.
1989 “Translations and Originals: Similarities and Dissimilarities I.” Target 1 (2): 151–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1990 “Translations and Originals: Similarities and Dissimilarities II.” Target 2 (1): 69–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCarty, Willard
2005 Humanities Computing. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munday, Jeremy
2001 Introducing Translation Studies: Theories and Applications. 1st ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2001 Introducing Translation Studies: Theories and Applications. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Munday, Jeremy, Sara Ramos Pinto, and Jacob Blakesley
2022 Introducing Translation Studies: Theories and Applications. 5th ed. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muñoz Martín, Ricardo
2010 “On Paradigms and Cognitive Translatology.” In Translation and Cognition, ed. by Gregory Shreve, and Erik Angelone, 169–187. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muñoz Martín, Ricardo, and César Andrés González Fernández
2021 “Cognitive Translatology: A Primer, Revisited.” Studies in Language, Communication and Cognition. Beijing Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press. 1 (1): 131–165.Google Scholar
Pym, Anthony
2010 Exploring Translation Theories. 1st ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pym, Anthony, Miriam Schlesinger, and Daniel Simeoni
eds. 2008 Beyond Descriptive Translation Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reiss, Katharina
1971/2000 Translation Criticism: Potential and Limitations [orig. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Übersetzungskritik, 1971]. Translated by Erroll F. Rhodes. Manchester: St Jerome and American Bible Society.Google Scholar
Toury, Gideon
1980 In Search of a Theory of Translation. Tel Aviv: The Porter Institute.Google Scholar
1995 Descriptive Translation Studies – and beyond. 1st ed. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995 Descriptive Translation Studies – and beyond. Revised ed. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Venuti, Lawrence
ed. 2012 The Translation Studies Reader. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Vidal Claramonte, María-Carmen África
2022 “Outward Turn.” In Encyclopedia of Translation and Interpreting, supervised by Javier Franco Aixelá, and Ricardo Muñoz Martín, and co-ordinated by Carmen Botella Tejera. Online: AIETI.Google Scholar