Cover not available
Article published In:
Audiovisual translation in context: Granting access to digital mediascapes
Edited by Jorge Díaz-Cintas, Alessandra Rizzo and Cinzia Giacinta Spinzi
[Translation and Translanguaging in Multilingual Contexts 9:3] 2023
► pp. 398–418

Accessibility and reception studies at the Macerata Opera Festival

| Università di Macerata
This essay discusses an audience reception study carried out within the framework of media accessibility to evaluate the experience of blind/partially sighted patrons and their (sighted) accompanying persons in the context of the Macerata Opera Festival (MOF). Adopting a qualitative analytical approach, feedback was collected from individuals in the sample who completed post-hoc self-report questionnaires, and three interdependent variables were measured: (a) comprehension and recall, (b) cognitive load, and (c) psychological immersion. This qualitative analysis was combined with a descriptive methodology, using attitudinal data to evaluate the lived experience of individuals, notably their appreciation and preferences. Results revealed that there was no substantial divergence in the values of the variables recorded for the two groups in the sample: blind/partially sighted and sighted (accompanying) patrons. Additionally, audio descriptions and tactile tours increased psychological immersion, without provoking cognitive overload. Furthermore, high levels of appreciation and preferences were related to comprehension and recall, cognitive load, and psychological immersion. This confirms the effectiveness of audio descriptions and tactile tours in enhancing the engagement and empowerment of blind/partially sighted members of the audience.
Keywords: media accessibility, reception studies, Macerata Opera Festival, empowerment, inclusion
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The questionnaire
    • 2.1The research variables
    • 2.2Structure and administration
    • 2.3Sample
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1 Section 2: Comprehension and recall
    • 3.2 Section 3: Cognitive load and immersion
    • 3.3 Section 4: Appreciation and preferences
  • 4.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 9 November 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ttmc.00120.raf
References (29)
References
ADLAB PRO. 2017. Accessed May 30, 2022. [URL]
Biltereyst, Daniel, and Philippe Meers. 2018. “Film, Cinema and Reception Studies: Revisiting Research on Audience’s Filmic and Cinematic Experiences.” In Reception Studies and Audiovisual Translation, ed. by Elena Di Giovanni, and Yves Gambier, 21–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christie, Ian. 2012. Audiences. Defining and Researching Screen Entertainment Reception. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Di Giovanni, Elena. 2014. “Visual and Narrative Priorities of the Blind and Non-Blind: Eye tracking and Audio Description.” Perspectives: Studies in Translatology 22 (1): 136–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Di Giovanni, Elena, and Yves Gambier. 2018. Reception Studies and Audiovisual Translation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Di Giovanni, Elena. 2018a. “Audio Description for Live Performances and Audience Participation.” The Journal of Specialised Translation 291: 189–211.Google Scholar
. 2018b. “Dubbing, Perception and Reception.” In Reception Studies in Audiovisual Translation, ed. by Elena Di Giovanni, and Yves Gambier, 159–178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. La traduzione audiovisiva e i suoi pubblici. Studi di ricezione. Napoli: Paolo Loffredo Editore.Google Scholar
Di Giovanni, Elena, and Francesca Raffi. 2022. “Inclusive Theatres as Boosters of Well-being: Concepts and Practices.” Journal of Audiovisual Translation 4 (1): 166–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
European Commission. 2010. “European Disability Strategy 2010–2020: A Renewed Commitment to a Barrier-Free Europe.” Accessed May 30, 2022. [URL]
Fresno, Nazaret. 2014. “Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words? The Role of Memory in Audio Description.” Across Languages and Cultures 15 (1): 111–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. “Approaching Engagement in Audio Description.” International Journal of Translation Technology 191: 13–32.Google Scholar
Fryer, Louise, Linda Pring, and Jonathan Freeman. 2013. “Audio Drama and the Imagination. The Influence of Sound Effects on Presence in People with and without Sight.” Journal of Media Psychology 25 (2): 65–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holland, Andrew. 2009. “Audio Description in the Theatre and the Visual Arts: Images into Words.” In Audiovisual Translation. Language Transfer on Screen, ed. by Jorge Díaz Cintas, and Gunilla Anderman, 170–185. Basingstroke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1959. “On Linguistic Aspects of Translation.” In On Translation, ed. by Arthur Brower Reuben, 232–239. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
ISTAT. Accessed January 3, 2023. [URL]
Jensen, Klaus Bruhn. 2012. “Lost, Found, and Made: Qualitative Data in the Study of Three-Step Flows of Communication.” In The Handbook of Global Media Research, ed. by Ingrid Volkmer, 435–450. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kruger, Jan-Louis, and Doherty Stephen. 2018. “Triangulation of Online and Offline Measures of Processing and Reception in AVT.” In Reception Studies in Audiovisual Translation, ed. by Elena Di Giovanni, and Yves Gambier, 91–109. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Orero, Pilar, Stephen Doherty, Jan-Louis Kruger, Anna Matamala, Jan Pedersen, Elisa Perego, Pablo Romero-Fresco, Sara Rovira-Esteva, Olga Soler-Vilageliu, and Agnieszka Szarkowska. 2018. “Conducting Experimental Research in Audiovisual Translation (AVT): A Position Paper.” The Journal of Specialised Translation 301: 105–126.Google Scholar
Ryhl, Camilla. 2009. “Architecture for Senses.” In Inclusive Buildings, Products & Services: Challenges in Universal Design, ed. by Tom Vavik, 104–127. Trondheim: Tapir.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya. 1993. “Capability and Well-being.” In The Quality of Life, ed. by Martha Nussbaum, and Amartya Sen, 29–53. Oxford: Clarendon Press. [URL]. DOI logo
Staiger, Janet. 2005. Media Reception Studies. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Tor-Carroggio, Irene, and Pilar Orero. 2019. “User Profiling in Audio Description Reception Studies: Questionnaires for All.” inTRAlinea 211. [URL]
Wallerstein, Nina. 1992. “Powerlessness, Empowerment, and Health: Implications for Health Promotion Programs.” American Journal of Health Promotion 6 (3): 197–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, Theresa L., and Donald McBurney. 2013. Research Methods. Belmont: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Wilken, Nicole, and Jan-Louis Kruger. 2016. “Putting the Audience in the Picture: Mise-en-shot and Psychological Immersion in Audio Described Film.” Across Languages and Cultures 17 (2): 253–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Opera Theatre
Verdi, Giuseppe. La Traviata. Directed by Henning Brockhaus, 2018.Google Scholar
Mozart, Wolfgang. Amadeus. The Magic Flute. Directed by Graham Vick, 2018.Google Scholar
Donizetti, Gaetano. L’Elisir d’amore. Directed by Damiano Michieletto, 2018.Google Scholar