The Moral Laboratory

Experiments examining the effects of reading literature on social perception and moral self-concept

| Utrecht University
HardboundAvailable
ISBN 9789027222237 (Eur) | EUR 105.00
ISBN 9781556196805 (USA) | USD 158.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027298546 | EUR 105.00 | USD 158.00
 
The idea that reading literature changes the reader seems as old as literature itself. Through the ages philosophers, writers, and literary scholars have suggested it affects norms, empathic ability, self-concept, beliefs, etc. This book examines what we actually know about these effects. And it finds strong evidence for the old claims. However, it remains unclear what aspects of the reading experience are responsible for these effects. Applying methods of the social sciences to this particular problem of literary theory, this book presents a psychological explanation based upon the conception of literature as a moral laboratory. A series of experiments examines whether imagining oneself in the shoes of characters affects beliefs about what it must be like to be someone else, and whether it affects beliefs about consequences of behavior. The results have implications for the role literature could play in society, for instance, in an alternative for traditional moral education.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
1. Apologies
1
2. Changing Readers
29
3. A Blueprint for Moral Laboratories
61
4. Understanding Others
97
5. Moral Self-knowledge
117
6. Summary and Conclusion
147
Appendix
169
References
183
Index of names
197
Index of terms
203
Cited by

Cited by other publications

No author info given
2011.  In Such Stuff as Dreams,  pp. 239 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2012.  In Scientific Methods for the Humanities [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 13], Crossref logo
Ahlzén, Rolf
2019. Narrativity and medicine: some critical reflections. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 14:1 Crossref logo
Alsup, Janet
2013. Teaching Literature in an Age of Text Complexity. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 57:3  pp. 181 ff. Crossref logo
Barnes, Jennifer L.
2018. Imaginary Engagement, Real-World Effects: Fiction, Emotion, and Social Cognition. Review of General Psychology 22:2  pp. 125 ff. Crossref logo
Bilandzic, Helena
2011. The Complicated Relationship Between Media and Morality. Journal of Media Psychology 23:1  pp. 46 ff. Crossref logo
Bilandzic, Helena, Cornelia Schnell & Freya Sukalla
2019. The Cultivation of Idealistic Moral Expectations: The Role of Television Exposure and Narrative Engageability. Mass Communication and Society 22:5  pp. 604 ff. Crossref logo
Bortolussi, Marisa, Peter Dixon & Christopher Linden
2018. Putting Perspective Taking in Perspective. Review of General Psychology 22:2  pp. 178 ff. Crossref logo
Brainard, Lori A.
2020. Putting “Perspectives” in Perspective: Literary Fiction, Empathy & Diversity In the Public Affairs Classroom. Public Integrity  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Caracciolo, Marco
2013. Phenomenological metaphors in readers’ engagement with characters: The case of Ian McEwan’sSaturday. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 22:1  pp. 60 ff. Crossref logo
Deane, Paul, Swapna Somasundaran, René R. Lawless, Hilary Persky & Colleen Appel
2019. The Key Practice, Building and Sharing Stories and Social Understandings: The Intrinsic Value of Narrative. ETS Research Report Series 2019:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Eden, Allison, Serena Daalmans, Merel Van Ommen & Addy Weljers
2017. Melfi’s Choice: Morally Conflicted Content Leads to Moral Rumination in Viewers. Journal of Media Ethics 32:3  pp. 142 ff. Crossref logo
Eder, Thomas
2012.  In Handbuch Literatur und Philosophie,  pp. 311 ff. Crossref logo
Ercolino, Stefano
2018. Negative empathy. Orbis Litterarum 73:3  pp. 243 ff. Crossref logo
EROL IŞIK, Nuran
2019. Popüler Tarihyazımı Mecrası olarak Türk TV Dizilerindeki Öykülendirme Pratiklerinin Değerlendirilmesi. Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi/26306220 :34  pp. 183 ff. Crossref logo
Even-Zohar, Itamar, Elias J. Torres Feijó & Antonio Monegal
2019. The End of Literature; or, What Purposes Does It Continue to Serve?. Poetics Today 40:1  pp. 7 ff. Crossref logo
Farmer, Harry & Lara Maister
2017. Putting Ourselves in Another’s Skin: Using the Plasticity of Self-Perception to Enhance Empathy and Decrease Prejudice. Social Justice Research 30:4  pp. 323 ff. Crossref logo
Fialho, Olivia & Anezka Kuzmicova
2019. What is literature for? The role of transformative reading. Cogent Arts & Humanities 6:1 Crossref logo
Girnth, Heiko & Stefan Burggraf
2019. Narration und Persuasion in der politischen Rede. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 49:1  pp. 107 ff. Crossref logo
Hakemulder, Frank, Olivia Fialho & Matthijs P. Bal
2016.  In Scientific Approaches to Literature in Learning Environments [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 24],  pp. 19 ff. Crossref logo
Hakemulder, Jemeljan F.
2004. Foregrounding and Its Effect on Readers' Perception. Discourse Processes 38:2  pp. 193 ff. Crossref logo
Hanauer, David I.
2018. Intermediate states of literariness. Scientific Study of Literature 8:1  pp. 114 ff. Crossref logo
Harits, Imron Wakhid
2017. Comparative Children Literature: Aesthetic and Didactic Context. e-Pedagogium 17:2  pp. 15 ff. Crossref logo
Harits, Imron Wakhid, Stefan Chudy, Alena Opletalova & Dana Vicherkova
2015. Vicarious Experience by Modeling and Comparing of Children Stories from Czech and Madura Island: Behavior and Moral Perspectives. Creative Education 06:07  pp. 683 ff. Crossref logo
Jarvis, Christine
2012. Fiction, empathy and lifelong learning. International Journal of Lifelong Education 31:6  pp. 743 ff. Crossref logo
Jaén, Isabel
2018.  In The Palgrave Handbook of Philosophy and Literature,  pp. 315 ff. Crossref logo
Kevane, Michael
2020. Reading Fiction and Economic Preferences of Rural Youth in Burkina Faso. Economic Development and Cultural Change 68:3  pp. 1041 ff. Crossref logo
Kidd, David & Emanuele Castano
2019. Reading Literary Fiction and Theory of Mind: Three Preregistered Replications and Extensions of Kidd and Castano (2013). Social Psychological and Personality Science 10:4  pp. 522 ff. Crossref logo
Kidd, David, Martino Ongis & Emanuele Castano
2016. On literary fiction and its effects on theory of mind. Scientific Study of Literature 6:1  pp. 42 ff. Crossref logo
Kneeskern, Ellen E. & Patricia A. Reeder
2020. Examining the impact of fiction literature on children’s gender stereotypes. Current Psychology Crossref logo
Koek, Martijn, Tanja Janssen, Frank Hakemulder & Gert Rijlaarsdam
2016. Literary reading and critical thinking. Scientific Study of Literature 6:2  pp. 243 ff. Crossref logo
Koopman, Eva Maria (Emy)
2018. Does Originality Evoke Understanding? The Relation between Literary Reading and Empathy. Review of General Psychology 22:2  pp. 169 ff. Crossref logo
Korthals Altes, Liesbeth & Hanna Meretoja
2018.  In The Palgrave Handbook of Philosophy and Literature,  pp. 601 ff. Crossref logo
Krijnen, Tonny & Marc Verboord
2016. TV genres’ moral value: The moral reflection of segmented TV audiences. The Social Science Journal 53:4  pp. 417 ff. Crossref logo
Kuiken, Don, Leah Phillips, Michelle Gregus, David S. Miall, Mark Verbitsky & Anna Tonkonogy
2004. Locating Self-Modifying Feelings Within Literary Reading. Discourse Processes 38:2  pp. 267 ff. Crossref logo
Kuzmičová, Anežka, Anne Mangen, Hildegunn Støle & Anne Charlotte Begnum
2017. Literature and readers’ empathy: A qualitative text manipulation study. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 26:2  pp. 137 ff. Crossref logo
Levy, Daniel & Avichai Snir
2017. Potterian Economics. SSRN Electronic Journal Crossref logo
Lewis, Michael Jay
2017. The Myth Isn’t Mine but Its Fictionality Is: Alger’sRagged Dick, Twain/Beach’s “Stephen Girard,” and the Reader in Training. Lit: Literature Interpretation Theory 28:4  pp. 317 ff. Crossref logo
Liao, Shen-yi & Tamar Szabó Gendler
2011. Pretense and imagination. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 2:1  pp. 79 ff. Crossref logo
Mar, Raymond A.
2018. Evaluating whether stories can promote social cognition: Introducing the Social Processes and Content Entrained by Narrative (SPaCEN) framework. Discourse Processes 55:5-6  pp. 454 ff. Crossref logo
Mar, Raymond A.
2018. Stories and the Promotion of Social Cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science 27:4  pp. 257 ff. Crossref logo
Mar, Raymond A. & Keith Oatley
2008. The Function of Fiction is the Abstraction and Simulation of Social Experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science 3:3  pp. 173 ff. Crossref logo
Mastellotto, Lynn
2018. Dwelling in difference: narratives of arrival and accommodation. Studies in Travel Writing 22:3  pp. 291 ff. Crossref logo
Małecki, Wojciech, Bogusław Pawłowski, Piotr Sorokowski & Edna Hillmann
2016. Literary Fiction Influences Attitudes Toward Animal Welfare. PLOS ONE 11:12  pp. e0168695 ff. Crossref logo
Meindl, Peter, Abigail Quirk & Jesse Graham
2018. Best Practices for School-Based Moral Education. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5:1  pp. 3 ff. Crossref logo
Mendelson-Maoz, Adia
2007. Ethics and Literature: Introduction. Philosophia 35:2  pp. 111 ff. Crossref logo
Mengozzi, Chiara
2018. Aux frontières de l’humanité : (in)efficacité de l’empathie et de l’expérience esthétique. AUC PHILOLOGICA 2018:3  pp. 165 ff. Crossref logo
Meretoja, Hanna
2016. Fiction, History and the Possible. Orbis Litterarum 71:5  pp. 371 ff. Crossref logo
Mumper, Micah L. & Richard J. Gerrig
2019. How Does Leisure Reading Affect Social Cognitive Abilities?. Poetics Today 40:3  pp. 453 ff. Crossref logo
Oatley, Keith, Robin Dunbar & Felix Budelmann
2018. Imagining Possible Worlds. Review of General Psychology 22:2  pp. 121 ff. Crossref logo
Polvinen, Merja, Howard Sklar & Anezka Kuzmicova
2019. Mimetic and synthetic views of characters: How readers process “people” in fiction. Cogent Arts & Humanities 6:1 Crossref logo
Samur, Dalya, Mattie Tops & Sander L. Koole
2018. Does a single session of reading literary fiction prime enhanced mentalising performance? Four replication experiments of Kidd and Castano (2013). Cognition and Emotion 32:1  pp. 130 ff. Crossref logo
Schnell, Cornelia & Helena K. Bilandzic
2017. Television Stories and the Cultivation of Moral Reasoning: The Role of Genre Exposure and Narrative Engageability. Journal of Media Ethics 32:4  pp. 202 ff. Crossref logo
Schrijvers, Marloes, Tanja Janssen, Olivia Fialho & Gert Rijlaarsdam
2019. Gaining Insight Into Human Nature: A Review of Literature Classroom Intervention Studies. Review of Educational Research 89:1  pp. 3 ff. Crossref logo
Smeyers, Paul
2005. The Labouring Sleepwalker: Evocation and expression as modes of qualitative educational research. Educational Philosophy and Theory 37:3  pp. 407 ff. Crossref logo
Smith, Ann Kowal, Capria Jaussen & Karen R. Nestor
2020. The seminar goes to work: Towards a theory of collaborative literacy. Industry and Higher Education 34:4  pp. 263 ff. Crossref logo
Somogyvári, Ildikó & János László
2012. The effects of categorial empathy on the reception of a historical short story. Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle 67:3  pp. 541 ff. Crossref logo
Suprawati, Maria N., Simone Volet & Deborah Pino-Pasternak
2020. How effort towards challenge is depicted in stories for young children: an Indonesian study. Asia Pacific Education Review 21:2  pp. 325 ff. Crossref logo
Thexton, Todd, Ajnesh Prasad & Albert J. Mills
2019. Learning empathy through literature. Culture and Organization 25:2  pp. 83 ff. Crossref logo
Turner, Rose & Fatima M. Felisberti
2018. Relationships between fiction media, genre, and empathic abilities. Scientific Study of Literature 8:2  pp. 261 ff. Crossref logo
van Peer, Willie & Aikaterini Nousi
2007.  In Literature and Stylistics for Language Learners,  pp. 181 ff. Crossref logo
Whalen, D.H., Lisa Zunshine, Evelyne Ender, Eugenia Kelbert, Jason Tougaw, Robert F. Barsky, Peter Steiner & Michael Holquist
2016. Validating judgments of perspective embedding. Scientific Study of Literature 6:2  pp. 278 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 august 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects

Consciousness Research

Consciousness research

Literature & Literary Studies

Theoretical literature & literary studies

Philosophy

Philosophy
BIC Subject: JMT – States of consciousness
BISAC Subject: PSY020000 – PSYCHOLOGY / Neuropsychology
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  00027895