2013The semantic effects of the Subject Genitive of Negation in Lithuanian. Baltic Linguistics 4: 9–38.
Ambrazas, Vytautas
(ed) 1997Lithuanian Grammar. Vilnius: Baltos lankos.
Ambrazas V
2001On the development of nominative object in East Baltic. In Circum-Baltic Languages, vol. 2: Grammar and Typology [Studies in Language Companion Series 55], Östen Dahl and Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds), 391–412. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Andrews, Avery D
2001Non-canonical A/S marking in Icelandic. In: Non-Canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects [Typological Studies in Language 46], Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, Robert M. W. Dixon, and Masayuki Onishi (eds), 85–111. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Andronov, Aleksey V
2001A survey of the case paradigm in Latvian. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 54(3): 197–208.
Arkadiev, Peter M
2013Marking of subjects and objects in Lithuanian non-finite clauses: A typological and diachronic perspective. Linguistic Typology 17(3): 397–437.
Barðdal, Jóhanna
2003 ‘Oblique Subjects’ in Icelandic and German. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 70: 61–99. Available at: [URL]
Bayer, Josef
2004Non-nominative subjects in comparison. In Non-nominative subjects, vol. 1 [Typological Studies in Language 60], Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 49–76. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Berg-Olsen, Sturla
1999A syntactic change in progress: The decline in the use of the non-prepositional genitive in Latvian, with a comparative view on Lithuanian. MA thesis, University of Oslo.
Berg-Olsen, Sturla
2000The Latvian non-prepositional genitive – a case losing ground. Res Balticae 6, 95–146.
Berg-Olsen, Sturla
2001Subjects and valency-changing mechanisms in Latvian. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 54(3): 200–225.
Berg-Olsen, Sturla
2005The Latvian dative and genitive: A Cognitive Grammar account. PhD thesis, University of Oslo.
Bickel, Balthasar
2004The syntax of experiencers in the Himalayas. In Non-nominative subjects, vol. 1 [Typological Studies in Language 60], Peri Bhaskararao& Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 77–112. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Bickel, Balthasar
2011Grammatical relations typology. In The Oxford Handbook of Language Typology,Jae Jung Song (ed), 399–444. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bickel, Balthasar & Johanna Nichols
2011Case marking and alignment. In The Oxford handbook of case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 304–321. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Borschev, Vladimir, Paducheva, Elena V., Partee, Barbara H., Testelets, Yakov, and Yanovich, Igor
2008Russian genitives, non-referentiality, and the property-type hypothesis. In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Stony Brook Meeting 2007 [Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistcs 16], A. Antonenko, J. F. Bailyn & C. Bethin (eds), 48–67. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.
Brown, Dunstan, Marina Chumakina and Greville G. Corbett
(eds)2013Canonical Morphology and Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Comrie, Bernard
1975The antiergative: Finland’s answer to Basque. Chicago Linguistic Society 11: 112–121.
Corbett, Greville G
1986The use of the genitive or accusative for the direct object of negated verbs in Russian: A bibliography. In Case in Slavic, Richard D. Brecht & James S. Levine (eds), 361–372. Columbus, Ohio: Slavica Publishers Inc.
Donohue, Mark
2008Semantic alignment systems: what’s what, and what’s not. In The typology of semantic alignment, Mark Donohue and Søren Wichmann (eds), 24–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Donohue, Mark & Wichmann, Søren
(eds)2008The Typology of Semantic Alignment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Endzelin, J[an]
1922Lettische Grammatik. Riga: Kommisionsverlag A. Gulbis.
Endzelīns, Jānis & Kārlis Mǖlenbachs
1907Latviešu gramatika. Rīga: K. J. Zichmanis.
Filip, Hana
2001Nominal and verbal semantic structure: analogies and interactions. Language Sciences 23: 453–501.
Filip, Hana
2005On accumulating and having it all. Perfectivity, prefixes and bare arguments. In Perspectives on aspect, H. J. Verkuyl, H. de Swart & A. van Hout (eds), 125–148. Dordrecht: Springer.
Franks, Stephen and Lavine, James E
2006Case and word order in Lithuanian. Journal of Linguistics 42(1): 239–288.
Haspelmath, Martin
2001Non-canonical marking of core arguments in European languages. In Non-canonical marking of subjects and objects [Typological Studies in Language 46], Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, Richard M.W. Dixon & Masayuki Onishi (eds), 53–83. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Haspelmath, Martin
2010Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in cross-linguistic studies. Language 86(3): 663–687.
Haspelmath, Martin
2011On S, A, P, T, and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology. Linguistic Typology 15: 535–567.
Holvoet, Axel
1992Bemerkungen über die Entwicklung des lettischen Kasussystems: Der Instrumental. In Colloquium Pruthenicum Primum. Papers from the First International Conference on Old Priussian, Wojciech Smoczyński and Axel Holvoet (eds), 143–149. Warsaw: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
Holvoet, Axel
2010Between morphosyntax and the paradigm: Some puzzling patterns of case distribution in Baltic and their implications. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 42(2): 175–198.
Forthcoming. Non-canonical subjects in Latvian: an obliqueness-based approach. In Contemporary Approaches to Baltic Linguistics, Peter M. Arkadiev, Björn Wiemer, Axel Holvoet eds Berlin De Gruyter.
Hopper, Paul and Thompson, Sandra
1980Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56(2): 251–299.
Huumo, Tuomas
2009Fictive dynamicity, nominal aspect, and the Finnish copulative construction. Cognitive Linguistics 20(1), 43–70.
Kagan, Olga
2010Genitive objects, existence and individuation. Russian Linguistics 34: 17–39.
Kagan, Olga
2013Semantics of genitive objects in Russian. Dordrecht: Springer.
Keenan, Edward L
1976Towards a universal definition of ‘subject’. Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed.), 303–333. New York: Academic Press.
Kiparsky, Paul
1998Partitive case and aspect. In The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors, Miriam Butt and Wilhelm Geuder (eds), 265–307. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria and Wälchli, Bernhard
2001The Circum-Baltic languages. An areal-typological approach. In Circum-Baltic Languages, vol. 2:
Grammar and Typology [Studies in Language Companion Series 55 ], Östen Dahl and Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds), 615–750. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Lavrin, B. A.
1963Ob odnoj slavjano-balto-finskoj izoglosse. Lietuvių kabotyros klausimai 6: 87–107.
2005Case pattern splits, verb types and construction competition. In Competition and Variation in Natural Languages: The Case for Case, Mengistu Amberber & Helen de Hoop (eds), 73–117. London: Elsevier.
2009 [1890/1891]Par akuzatīvu un ģenitīvu pie noliegtiem tranzitīviem verbiem. In Kārlis Mīlenbahs. Darbu izlase divos sējumos. 1. sējums, 42–49. Rīga: LU Latviešu valodas institūts.
Moore, John and Perlmutter, David M
2000What does it take to be a Dative Subject?Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 373–416.
Mühlenbach, Karl
1902/3.Über die vermeintlichen Genitive oder Ablative auf -ů oder u im Lettischen. Indogermanische Forschungen 13: 220–260.
Næss, Åshild
2007Prototypical Transitivity [Typological Studies in Language 72]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Næss, Åshild
2011Varieties of dative. In The Oxford Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 572–580. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nau, Nicole
1998Latvian [Languages of the World/Materials 217]. München: Lincom Europa.
Nau, Nicole
2011bDeclension classes in Latvian and Latgalian: Morphomics vs. Morphophonology. Baltic Linguistics 2: 141–177.
Nichols, Johanna
2008Why are stative-active languages rare in Eurasia? A typological perspective on split-subject marking. In The typology of semantic alignment, Mark Donohue and Søren Wichmann (eds), 121–139. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Partee, Barbara H., Borschev, Vladimir, Paducheva, Elena V., Testelets, Yakov, and Yanovich, Igor
2011Russian Genitive of Negation Alternations: The Role of Verb Semantics. Scando-Slavica 57(2): 135–159.
Partee, Barbara H., Borschev, Vladimir, Paducheva, Elena V., Testelets, Yakov, and Yanovich, Igor
2012The role of verb semantics in genitive alternations: genitive of negation and genitive of intensionality. In The Russian Verb [Oslo Studies in Language 4(1)], Atle Grønn & Anna Pazelskaya (eds), 1–29.
Perkova, Natalia
MS. Non-canonical argument marking in two-place predication: the case of the Baltic languages. Unpublished paper, Stockholm 2013.
Piccini, Silvia
2008Traces of non-nominative alignment in Lithuanian: the impersonal constructions in Indo-European perspective. Baltistica 43(3): 437–461.
Primus, Beatrice
2011Case, grammatical relations, and semantic roles. In The Oxford Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov and Andrew Spencer (eds), 261–275. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Raģe, S
1964Erģemes, Lugazu un Valkas izloksnes fonētika un morfoloģija. Valodas un literatūras institūta raksti 8: 5–142.
Seržant, Ilja
2013aRise of canonical objecthood with the Lithuanian verbs of pain. Baltic Linguistics 4: 187–211.
Seržant, Ilja
2013bRise of Canonical Subjecthood. In The Diachrony of Non-canonical Subjects [Studies in Language Companion Series 140], Ilja A. Seržant and Leonid Kulikov (eds), 309–336. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Seržant, Ilja
forthcoming. Dative experiencer constructions as a Circum-Baltic isogloss. In Contemporary Approaches to Baltic Linguistics, Peter M. Arkadiev, Björn Wiemer, Axel Holvoet eds Berlin De Gruyter.
Seržant, Ilja A., Fedriani, Chiara, and Kulikov, Leonid
2013Introduction. In The Diachrony of Non-canonical Subjects, Ilja A. Seržant, and Leonid Kulikov (eds) [Studies in Language Companion Series 140], ix–xxvi. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
2020. Contact-induced change in the languages of Europe: The rise and development of partitive cases and determiners in Finnic and Basque. Linguistics 58:3 ► pp. 869 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.