Differential object marking in Latgalian
Nicole Nau | Adam Mickiewicz University Poznan | Vilnius University
This article discusses variation in object marking in Latgalian, based on sources where this phenomenon is most pronounced. Differential object marking in Latgalian consists in the choice of the genitive instead of the accusative for objects of transitive verbs. Genitive marking regularly appears in negated clauses and in constructions with the supine. It is optionally used in clauses that portray a situation as unreal, unlikely, or undesired from the point of view of the speaker. Apart from these clause-related factors, genitive marking is common though less regular with mass nouns and count nouns in the plural in descriptions of single events, while for habitually occurring events the accusative is used. The use of the partitive genitive is increasingly coupled with prefixing of the verb. A further type is the use of the genitive with cumulative verbs. There is also a small group of non-derived verbs that select the genitive. Those that have a nominative subject tend to become transitive verbs in modern written Latgalian.
References
Sources
Ādama stāsts. Mazsalaciešu dzīve, ieradumi un tikumi Ā. Purmaļa autobiogrāfijā 19. un 20. gs. mijā
2008 Ed.
Sanita Reinsone. Rīga: Zinātne.
IS = texts from Ilze Sperga’s blog at
KS =
Kur sauleitei sāta
, short story by Ilze Sperga published 2008 on her former web-site at
[URL]
Mar =
Marabeju kolns
, short story by Ilze Sperga, published 2011 on her web-site at
[URL]
Miljons-1.0 = corpus of contemporary Latvian, 1 million words
. Access through
[URL] [accessed in
August 2013]
Miljons-2.0 = corpus of contemporary Latvian, 3.5 million words
. Access through
[URL] [accessed
April-August 2013]]
MuLa-1.0 = corpus of contemporary written Latgalian, 1 million words
. Access through
[URL] [accessed
April-August 2013]
UP = Ulanowska, Stefania
1895 Łotysze Inflant polskich, a w szczególności gminy Wielońskiej, powiatu Rzeżyckiego. Obraz etnograficzny. Część III.
Zbiór wiadomości do antropologii krajowej
, t. XVIII, 232–406.
VL = texts written by Valentins Lukaševičs
published in a Latvian newspaper (
Latvijas Avīze
) and on the Internet, available at the portal
[URL]
Bukšs, Miķelis & Placinskis, Jurs
1973
Latgaļu volūdas gramatika un pareizraksteibas vōrdneica
[Latgalian Grammar and orthographic dictionary]. 2nd edn. München: Latgalischer Verlag.
Cibuļs, Jurs & Leikuma, Lidija
2003
Vasals! Latgaliešu valodas mācība
. Rīga: n.i.m.s.
de Hoop, Helen & Malchukov, Andrej L.
2008 Case marking strategies.
Linguistic Inquiry
39: 565–587.
Endzelin, Jan
1922
Lettische Grammatik
. Riga: Kommisionsverlag A. Gulbis.
Filip, Hana
2005 On accumulating and having it all. Perfectivity, prefixes and bare arguments. In
Perspectives on aspect,
Henk J. Verkuyl,
Henriëtte de Swart &
Angeliek van Hout (eds), 125–148. Dordrecht: Springer.
Gāters, Alfrēds
1977
Die lettische Sprache und ihre Dialekte
. The Hague: Mouton.
Haspelmath, Martin
2011 On S, A, P, T, and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology.
Linguistic Typology
15: 535–567.
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A.
1980 Transitivity in grammar and discourse.
Language
56: 251–299.
Kagan, Olga
2010 Genitive objects, existence and individuation.
Russian Linguistics
34: 17–39.
Kagan, Olga
2013
Semantics of genitive objects in Russian
. Dordrecht: Springer.
Leikuma, Lidija
2010 Par dažiem Latgales latviešu folkloras pieraksta jautājumiem: Lettische Volkslieder (1869).
Baltu Filoloģija
19: 53–70.
Lindāne, Irma
1986
Dignājas izloksne
. Rīga: Zinātne.
Malchukov, Andrej L.
2005 Case pattern splits, verb types and construction competition. In
Competition and variation in natural languages: The case for case,
Mengistu Amber &
Helen de Hoop (eds), 73–117. London: Elsevier.
Nau, Nicole
2011a
A short grammar of Latgalian
. München: Lincom Europa.
Nau, Nicole
2011b Declension classes in Latvian and Latgalian: Morphomics vs. Morphophonology.
Baltic Linguistics
2: 141–177.
Noonan, Michael
2007 Complementation. In
Language typology and syntactic description. Volume II: Complex constructions,
Timothy Shopen (ed), 52–150. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sinnemäki, Kaius
2012ms A typological perspective to differential object marking. Manuscript, version 24 Aug 2012
[URL] (
02 March 2013).
Strods, Pīters
1933
Pareizraksteibas vōrdneica
. Rēzekne [published by the author].
Tsunoda, Tasaku
1985 Remarks on transitivity.
Journal of Linguistics
21: 385–396.
Ūsele, Veneranda
1998
Tilžas izloksnes apraksts
. Rīga: Latviešu valodas institūts.
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Holvoet, Axel & Nicole Nau
Seržant, Ilja A.
2021.
Typology of partitives.
Linguistics 59:4
► pp. 881 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.