Article published in:Grammatical Relations and their Non-Canonical Encoding in Baltic
Edited by Axel Holvoet and Nicole Nau
[Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic 1] 2014
► pp. 257–299
The independent partitive genitive in Lithuanian
The aim of the paper is to give a semantic description of the independent or bare partitive genitive (IPG) in Lithuanian in rather neutral, functional terms. The IPG is a multi-faceted category that bears on the domains of quantification and (in)definiteness. On its quantificational reading, the IPG encodes an implicit quantifier, arbitrary in its value. I have used the notion of (un)boundedness (re-)introduced in Paul Kiparsky’s (1998) seminal paper on the partitive case in Finnish. NP-internally, the IPG has two main readings: unbounded and bounded reading. The first reading provides the concept of the participant rather than ‘zooming in’ on particular instantiations. It is extremely weak referentially, probably the weakest option available in Lithuanian. This reading is restricted to those verbs in Lithuanian that allow their arguments to be kind-referring NPs (e.g., the subject of the existential to be, or object of to know). On the bounded reading, in turn, the IPG encodes an undetermined but delimited set, the reading is existential and resembles indefinite plurals. The individuals introduced by this reading are stored in the discourse model and may be picked up by anaphoric pronouns in the following discourse. They never constitute primary or foregrounded information of the message, though. Furthermore, I have claimed that the incremental-theme verbs and verbs of transfer in East Lithuanian interact with the IPG-marked object with respect to their aspectual properties. Here only the bounded reading of the IPG is available. This explains the ban on the occurrence of IPG in imperfective contexts in Lithuanian (such as progressive, which has no grammatical marking in Lithuanian, generic and iterated atelics) with incremental-theme verbs, because the imperfective interpretation induces an inherently unbounded event which is not compatible with the bounded reading of the IPG. Both bounded and unbounded values are assumed to be originally two different readings of the same implicit quantifier that have, however, acquired different distributions in the course of time.
Published online: 16 May 2014
Babby, Leonard H.
Bertinetto, Pier Marco
Borschev, Vladimir, Elena V. Paducheva, Barbara H. Partee, Yakov G. Testelets & Igor Yanovich
Carlson, Greg N.
1994 Systems of grammatical number in Slavonic. Slavonic and East European Review 72(2), 201–217. A revised version of: Systems of grammatical number in Slavonic. In Studies in Number and Quantification , David Gil (ed), European Science Foundation Programme in Language Typology: Theme 7, Noun Phrase Structure: Working Paper no. VII/19.
Doetjes, Jenny S.
1997 Quantifiers and Selection. On the distribution of quantifying expressions in French, Dutch and English. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics. (https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/handle/1887/19731)
1989 Aspectual Properties of the AN-Construction in German. In: Tempus — Aspekt — Modus. Die lexikalischen und grammatischen Formen in den germanischen Sprachen [Tense — Aspect — Mood. Lexical and Grammatical Forms in the Germanic Languages] [Linguistische Arbeiten 237], Werner Abraham & Theo Janssen (eds), 259–292. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
Franks, Steven & James E. Lavine
de Hoop, Helen
Keenan, Edward L. & Denis Paperno
Kittilä, Seppo, Jussi Ylikoski & Katja Västi
Krasovitsky, Alexander, Matthew Baerman, Dunstan Brown & Greville G. Corbett
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria & Bernhard Wälchli
Lestrade, Sander & Helena de Hoop
Mehlig, Hans Robert
2006 Glagol’nyj vid i vtoričnaja gomogenizacija oboznačajemoj situacii: K upotrebleniju delimitativnogo sposoba dejstvija v russkom jazyke [Verbal aspect and secondary homogenization of the situation: On the use of the delimitative aktionsart in Russian]. In Semantika i Struktura slavjanskogo vida 4 [Semantics and Structure of Slavic Aspect 4], Volkmar Lehmann (ed), 235–276. München: Sagner.
Paducheva, Elena V.
Partee, Barbara H.
Partee, Barbara H. & Vladimir Borschev
Rachilina, Ekaterina V.
Seržant, Ilja A.
Forthcoming-a. Independent partitive genitive in Russian and North Russian. To appear in Contemporary approaches to dialectology: The area of North, Northwest Russian and Belarusian vernaculars [Slavica Bergensia 13], Ilja A. Seržant & Björn Wiemer (eds). Bergen: University of Bergen.
Tatevosov, Sergei & Mikhail Ivanov
2004 A Reference Grammar of Russian . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (http://www.dilbilim.info/doktora/Belgeler/Actionality.pdf)
van Geenhoven, Veerle & Louise McNally
Cited by 9 other publications
Holvoet, Axel & Nicole Nau
Luraghi, Silvia, Merlijn De Smit & Iván Igartua
Seržant, Ilja A.
Seržant, Ilja A.
Seržant, Ilja A., Katarzyna Maria Janic, Darja Dermaku & Oneg Ben Dror
Wiemer, Björn & Vaiva Žeimantienė
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.