Article published in:
Grammatical Relations and their Non-Canonical Encoding in Baltic
Edited by Axel Holvoet and Nicole Nau
[Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic 1] 2014
► pp. 301361
Sources

Sources

Jónsson, Jóhannes G.
1998 A list of Predicates that Take a Quirky Subject in Icelandic , Ms. University of Iceland.Google Scholar
Dabartinės Lietuvių Kalbos Žodynas DLKŽ
(2000)
Lietuvių kalbos tekstynas
LKŽ – Lietuvių kalbos žodynas
20 vol., Vilnius
LKŽe – Lietuvių kalbos žodynas
electronic variant, http://​www​.lkz​.lt/
Sližienė, Nijolė
2004 Lietuvių kalbos veiksmažodžių junglumo žodynas vols. 1–3. Vilnius: Mokslo ir enciklopedijų leidybos institutas.Google Scholar
References
Anderson, Cori
Forthcoming. Non-canonical case patterns in Lithuanian. In Contemporary Approaches to Baltic Linguistics , Peter M. Arkadiev, Axel Holvoet, and Björn Wiemer (eds). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref
Andrews, Avery
1976The VP complement analysis in Modern Icelandic. North Eastern Linguistic Society 6: 1–21.Google Scholar
1982The Representation of Case in Modern Icelandic. In The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations , Joan Bresnan (ed.), 427–503. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Apresjan, Jurij D.
1967 Ėksperimental’noe issledovanie semantiki russkogo glagola . Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar
21995 [1974] Leksičeskaja semantika (sinonimičeskie sredstva jazyka) . Moskva: Škola “Jazyki russkoj kul’tury”.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna
2001 Case in Icelandic – A synchronic, diachronic and comparative approach . Lund University dissertation. [Published as Lundastudier i nordisk språkvetenskap A57, Lund: Department of Scandinavian Languages 2001.]Google Scholar
2004The semantics of the impersonal construction in Icelandic, German and Faroese: beyond thematic roles. In Focus on Germanic Typology . Werner Abraham (ed), 101–130. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Construction-specific properties of syntactic subjects in Icelandic and German. Cognitive Linguistics 17(1), 19–106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 Productivity: Evidence from Case and Argument Structure in Icelandic . Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Butt, Miriam
2009Modern approaches to case: an overview. In The Oxford Handbook of Case , Andrej Malchukov and Andrew Spencer (eds), 27–43. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cennamo, Michela, Eythórsson, Thórhallur
Barðdal, Jóhanna. Forthcoming. The Rise and Fall of Anticausative Constructions in Indo-European: The context of Latin and Germanic . Submitted to a thematic volume of Linguistics .
Croft, W.
1998Event Structure in Argument Linking. In The Projection of Arguments. Lexical and Compositional Factors , Miriam Butt and Wilhelm Geuder (eds), 21–63. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen
1985 Case Grammar and Prototypes . Duisburg: Linguistic Agency, University of Duisburg, Series A 146.Google Scholar
Dixon, Richard M. W.
1991 A New Approach to English Grammar, on Semantic Principles . Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, Richard M.
W 1994 Ergativity . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dowty, Richard
1979 Word meaning and Montague Grammar . Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1991Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67: 547–619. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eythórsson, Thórhallur
2000aDative vs. nominative: changes in quirky subjects in Icelandic. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics 8: 27–44.Google Scholar
2000bFall á fallanda fæti [Unstable case marking]. Íslenskt mál og almenn málfræði 22: 185–204.Google Scholar
2002Changes in subject case marking in Icelandic. In Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change , David Lightfoot (ed), 196–212. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
and Barðdal, Jóhanna 2005Oblique subjects: A common Germanic inheritance! Language 81(4): 824–881. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Friðriksson, Finnur
2008 Language Change vs. Stability in Conservative Language Communities: A Case Study of Icelandic . PhD Dissertation, Gothenburg University.Google Scholar
Halldórsson, Halldór
1982Um méranir: Drög að samtímalegri og sögulegri athugun [About dativizings: preliminaries to a synchronic and diachronic investigation]. Íslenskt mál og almenn málfræði 4: 159–189.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1999External Possession in a European areal perspective. In External possession Typological Studies in Language 39], Doris L. Payne and Immanuel Barshi (eds), 109–135. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001Non-canonical marking of core arguments in European languages. In Non-Canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects [Typological Studies in Language 46], Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, Richard M. W. Dixon & Masayuki Onishi (eds.), 53–83. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins,. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011On S, A, P, T and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology. Linguistic Typology 15: 535–567. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.
and Thompson, Sandra A. 1980Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse. Language 56, 251–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jónsson, Jóhannes G.
1996 Clausal Architecture and Case in Icelandic . Amherst: University of Massachusetts dissertation.Google Scholar
2003Not so quirky: on subject case in Icelandic. In New Perspectives on Case and Case Theory , Ellen Brandner and Heike Zinsmeister (eds), 127–164. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
and Eythórsson, Thórhallur 2005Variation in subject case marking in Insular Scandinavian. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 28 (2): 223–245. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Edward
1976Towards a universal definition of ‘subject’. In Subject and Topic , Charles N. Li (ed.), 303–333. New York etc.: Academic Press.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard
2001Internal and external possessors. In Language Typology and Language Universals , Martin Haspelmath et al.. (eds), vol. 2, 970–978. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lenartaitė, Kristina
2011 Argumentų raiškos alternavimas lietuvių kalboje [Alternations in Argument Realization in Lithuanian]. Unpublished PhD thesis, Vilnius.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth
1993 English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation . Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1977 Semantics (2 vols). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej
and Narrog, Heiko 2009Case polysemy. In The Oxford Handbook of Case , Andrej Malchukov and Andrew Spencer (eds), 518–534. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maling, Joan
2002Það rignir þágufalli á Íslandi [Verbs with dative objects in Icelandic]. Íslenskt mál 24: 31–105.Google Scholar
Minger, David L.
2002 An Analysis of Grammatical Relations and Case Marking in Icelandic . MA Thesis, University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
Narrog, Heiko
2009Varieties of instrumental. In The Oxford Handbook of Case , Andrej Malchukov and Andrew Spencer (eds), 593–600. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Onishi, Masayuki
2001Introduction: Non-canonically marked subjects and objects: Parameters and properties. In Non-Canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects [Typological Studies in Language 46], Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, Richard M. W. Dixon & Masayuki Onishi (eds), 1–51. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ottosson, Kjartan
2009 The Anticausative and Related Categories in the Old Germanic Languages . Ms. University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Payne, Doris
and Barshi, Immanuel 1999 External Possession [Typological Studies in Language 39]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Primus, Beatrice
2009Case, grammatical relations, and semantic roles. In The Oxford Handbook of Case , Andrej Malchukov and Andrew Spencer (eds), 261–275. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur
1983Þágufallssýkin og fallakerfi í íslensku [Dative sickness and the case system in Icelandic]. Skíma 16: 3–6.Google Scholar
Saj, Sergej S.
2011Nekanoničeskoe markirovanie aktantov mnogomestnyx predikatov: opyt kvantitativno-tipologičeskogo issledovanija. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana , vol. vii, part 3, Nikolaj N. Kazanskij (ed), 424–430. Sankt-Peterburg: Nauka.Google Scholar
Forthcoming. Bivalent verb classes in the languages of Europe: A quantitative typological study. Submitted to Language Dynamics and Change .
Seefranz-Montag, Ariane von
1983 Syntaktische Funktionen und Wortstellungsveränderung. Die Entwicklung „Subjektloser” Konstruktionen in einigen Sprachen . Munich: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
Seržant, Ilja. A.
2013aRise of canonical objecthood with the Lithuanian verbs of pain. Baltic Linguistics 4: 187–211.Google Scholar
Seržant, Ilja A.
2013bThe diachronic typology of non-canonical subjects and subject-like obliques. In The Diachronic Typology of Non-canonical Subjects [Studies in Language Companion Series 140] , Ilja A. Seržant and Leonid Kulikov (eds), 313–360. Amsterdam/Philadelphia. John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Á.
1989 Verbal Syntax and Case in Icelandic . Lund: Lund University dissertation. [Published: Reykjavík: Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland 1992.]Google Scholar
Smith, Henry
1994Dative Sickness in Germanic. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12: 675–736. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Michel B.
2001Why quirky case really isn’t quirky (Or how to treat dative sickness in Icelandic). In Polysemy in Cognitive Linguistics , Hubert Cuyckens and Britta E. Zawada, (eds), 115–159. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Svavarsdóttir, Ásta
1982‘Þágufallssýki [‘Dative Sickness’]’. Íslenskt mál og almenn málfræði 4: 19–62.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter
2001Case and event structure. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 26, 197–217.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur
1979 On Complementation in Icelandic . Harvard University dissertation, Cambridge, MA [Published: New York: Garland 1979.]Google Scholar
2007 The Syntax of Icelandic . Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Valin, Robert D., Jr.
1991Another look at Icelandic case marking and grammatical relations. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9: 145–194. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr.
2005 Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface . Cambridge etc.: Cambridge U.P. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. & LaPolla, Randy
1997 Syntax. Structure, meaning and function . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Zenon
1967 [1957] Linguistics in Philosophy . Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Viberg, Åke.
1984The verbs of perception: A typological study. Explanations for Language Universals , Brian Butterworth, Bernard Comrie, and Östen Dahl (eds), 123–162. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wiemer, Björn
2013Značimost’ sposobov modifikacii glagol’nyx osnov dlja ocenki areal’noj differenciacii baltijskix jazykov (po sravneniju s rjadom slavjanskix mikrojazykov). In Tipologija slavjanskix, baltijskix i balkanskix jazykov (v svete jazykovyx kontaktov) , Vjačeslav Vs. Ivanov and & Petr M. Arkad’ev (eds), 220–246. Sankt-Peterburg: Aletejja.Google Scholar
Zaenen, Annie, Maling, Joan
and Thráinsson, Höskuldur 1985Case and grammatical functions: The Icelandic passive. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 441–483. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Holvoet, Axel
2016.  In Argument Realization in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 3],  pp. 83 ff. Crossref logo
Malchukov, Andrej L.
2018.  In Non-Canonically Case-Marked Subjects [Studies in Language Companion Series, 200],  pp. 241 ff. Crossref logo
Seržant, Ilja A.
2016.  In Argument Realization in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 3],  pp. 137 ff. Crossref logo
Wiemer, Björn & Vaiva Žeimantienė
2016.  In Argument Realization in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 3],  pp. 259 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.