Article published in:
Voice and Argument Structure in Baltic
Edited by Axel Holvoet and Nicole Nau
[Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic 2] 2015
► pp. 1–36

Voice in Baltic

An overview

| Vilnius University
| University of Warsaw
Published online: 05 August 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/vargreb.2.002int
References
Ackema, Peter & Schoorlemmer, Maaike
2006 Middles. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax vol. 3, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 131–203. Malden: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Yu
2011 Causatives which do not cause: Non-valency-increasing effects of a valency-increasing derivation. In Language at Large. Essays on Syntax and Semantics, Alexandra Yu. Aikhenvald & Robert M.W. Dixon, 86–142. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis & Schäfer, Florian
eds 2013 Non-Canonical Passives [Linguistik Aktuell / Linguistics Today, 205]. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ambrazas, Vytautas
1990 Sravnitel’nyj sintaksis pričastij baltijskix jazykov [A Comparative Syntax of Participles in Baltic]. Vilnius: Mokslas.Google Scholar
Ambrazas, Vytautas, et al.
1997 Lithuanian Grammar. Vilnius: Baltos lankos.Google Scholar
Andronov, Aleksej
2000 Some remarks on the system of Lithuanian and Latvian conjugation. Linguistica Baltica 8: 35–47.Google Scholar
Arkadiev, Peter M
2013 From transitivity to aspect: Causative-inchoative alternation and its extensions in Lithuanian. Baltic Linguistics 4: 39–77.Google Scholar
Arumaa, Peeter
1957 Von der Eigenart des Ablauts und der Diathese im Baltischen. Zeitschrift für Slavische Philologie 26: 118–149.Google Scholar
Blevins, James P
2003 Passives and impersonals. Journal of Linguistics, 39: 473‒520. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cibuļs, Jurs & Leikuma, Lidija
2003 Vasals! Latgaliešu valodas mācība [Manual of Latgalian]. [Rīga:] n.i.m.s.Google Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W
2000 A typology of causatives: Form, syntax, and meaning. In Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity, R.M.W. Dixon & Alexandra Aikhenvald (eds), 30–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W. & Aikhenvald, Alexandra
2000 Introduction. In Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity, R.M.W. Dixon & Alexandra Aikhenvald (eds), 1–29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
eds 2000 Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Endzelin, J[an]
1922 Lettische Grammatik. Riga: Gulbis.Google Scholar
Geniušienė, Emma
1987 The Typology of Reflexives. Berlin etc.: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 Passives in Lithuanian (in comparison with Russian). In Passivization and Typology: Form and Function [Typological Studies in Language, 68], Werner Abraham & Larisa Leisiö (eds), 29–61. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1993 More on the typology of inchoative / causative verb alternations. In Causatives and Transitivity [Studies in Language Companion Series, 23], Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds), 87–120. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Calude, Andreea & Spagnol, Michael & Narrog, Heiko & Bamyacı, Elif
2014 Coding causal-noncausal verb alternations: a form-frequency correspondence explanation. Journal of Linguistics 50 (3): 587–625. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holvoet, Axel
2000 Reflexiva typu słowiańskiego w pewnej gwarze górnołotewskiej [Reflexives of the Slavonic type in a High Latvian dialect]. In Kontakty językowe polszczyzny na pograniczu wschodnim. Prace ofiarowane Profesorowi Januszowi Riegerowi, Ewa Wolnicz-Pawłowska & Wanda Szulowska (eds), 97–102. Warsaw: Semper.Google Scholar
2001a Studies in the Latvian Verb. Cracow: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.Google Scholar
2001b Impersonals and passives in Baltic and Finnic. In The Circum-Baltic Languages. Typology and Contact. Vol. 2: Grammar and Typology [Studies in Languages Companion Series, 55], Östen Dahl & Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds), 363–389. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 Mood and Modality in Baltic. Cracow: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.Google Scholar
Holvoet, Axel & Nau, Nicole
2014 Argument marking and grammatical relations in Baltic: An overview. In Grammatical Relations and their Non-Canonical Encoding in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 1], Axel Holvoet & Nicole Nau (eds), 1–41. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kalnača, Andra & Lokmane, Ilze
2012 The semantics and distribution of Latvian reflexive verbs. In Multiple Perspectives in Linguistic Research on Baltic languages, Aurelija Usonienė, Nicole Nau & Ineta Dabašinskienė (eds.), 229–256. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. & Dryer, Matthew S
2007 Passive in the world’s languages. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description vol. 1, Clause Structure, 2nd edn., Timothy Shopen (ed), 325–361. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kehayov, Petar & Vihman, Virve
2014 The lure of lability: a synchronic and diachronic investigation of the labile pattern in Estonian. Linguistics 52 (4): 1061–1105. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kemmer, Suzan
1993 The Middle Voice [Typological Studies in Language, 23]. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kittillä, Seppo
2011 Transitivity typology. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, Song, Jae Jung (ed.), 346–367. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid I
2011 Voice typology. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, Song, Jae Jung (ed.), 368–398. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid & Lavidas, Nikolaos
2014 Introduction [to the special issue on labile verbs]. Linguistics 52(4): 871–877.Google Scholar
Lavine, James E
2006 Is there a passive evidential strategy in Lithuanian? In Papers from the 42nd Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society , Jacqueline Bunting et al. (eds), 41–55.
Letuchiy, Alexander
2009 Towards a typology of labile verbs: Lability vs. derivation. In New Challenges in Typology. Transcending the Borders and Refining the Distinctions, Alexandre Arkhipov & Patience Epps (eds.), 223–244. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lyngfelt, Benjamin & Solstad, Torgrim
eds 2006 Demoting the Agent. Passive, Middle and Other Voice Phenomena [Linguistik Aktuell / Linguistics Today, 96]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mel’čuk, Igor
1993 The inflectional category of voice: towards a more rigorous definition. In Causatives and Transitivity [Studies in Language Companion Series, 23], Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds), 1–46. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
2000 Valency-changing derivation in Central Alaskan Yup’ik. In Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity, R.M.W. Dixon & Alexandra Aikhenvald (eds), 84–114. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nau, Nicole
1998 Latvian (Languages of the World/Materials, 217). München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P
1969 Nekotorye verojatnostnye universalii v glagol’nom slovoobrazovanii [Some likely universals in verbal word formation]. In Jazykovye universalii i lingvističeskaja tipologija, Igor’ F. Vardul’ (ed.), 106–114. Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar
Nedyalkov, V.P. & G.G. Silnitsky
1973 The typology of morphological and lexical causatives. In Trends in Soviet Theoretical Linguistics, Ferenc Kiefer (ed), 1–32. Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Johanna
1993 Transitive and causative in the Slavic lexicon: Evidence from Russian. In Causatives and Transitivity [Studies in Language Companion Series, 23], Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds), 69–86. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Johanna, David A. Peterson & Jonathan Barnes
2004 Transitivizing and detransitivizing languages. Linguistic Typology 8: 149–211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ostrowski, Norbert
2006 Studia z historii czasownika litewskiego. Iteratiwa, denominatiwa [Studies in the History of the Lithuanian Verb. Iteratives, Denominatives]. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.Google Scholar
Pakerys, Jurgis
2012 On the typology of recent verbal borrowings in Baltic. Paper read at the 45th Annual Meeting of the SLE, Stockholm, August 2012.
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1985 Passives and related constructions: a prototype analysis. Language 61 (4): 821–848. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998 Voice parameters. In Typology of Verbal Categories. Papers Presented to Vladimir Nedjalkov on the Occasion of his 70th Birthday, Leonid Kulikov & Heinz Vater (eds), 117–138. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stang, Christian S
1942 Das slavische und baltische Verbum. Skriften utgitt av Det Norske Videnskaps Akademi i Oslo. II. Historisk-Filosofisk Klasse. 1942, I. Oslo: Dybwad.Google Scholar
1966 Vergleichende Grammatik der Baltischen Sprachen. Oslo etc.: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Timberlake, Alan
1982 The impersonal passive in Lithuanian. Proceedings of the 8th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society , 508–524.
Veidemane, Ruta
2002 Darbības vārds [The verb]. In Latviešu literārās valodas morfoloģiskās sistēmas attīstība: Lokāmās vārdšķiras, Kornēlija Pokrotniece (ed.), 409–509. Rīga: LU Latviešu valodas institūts.Google Scholar
Wiemer, Björn
2006 Relations between actor-demoting devices in Lithuanian. In Passivization and Typology: Form and Function [Typological Studies in Language, 68], Werner Abraham & Larisa Leisiö (eds), 274–309. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
The World Atlas of Transitivity Pairs
2014 Tokyo: National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics. (Available online at: http://​watp​.ninjal​.ac​.jp​/en/)Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Dieter
Forthcoming. Valency-changing word-formation. Draft of May 2012. To appear in Handbook of Word-Formation, Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen, & Franz Rainer (eds.) Berlin de Gruyter Mouton Crossref
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Holvoet, Axel & Nicole Nau
2016.  In Argument Realization in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 3], ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 july 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.