Cover not available
Part of
Voice and Argument Structure in Baltic
Edited by Axel Holvoet and Nicole Nau
[Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic 2] 2015
► pp. 147–178

Extended uses of morphological causatives in Latvian

The literature on morphological causatives has tended to concentrate on prototypical causativity, that is, on situations where the argument structure of a predicate is expanded by the addition of a causer. Extended uses of causative morphology, affecting argument structure in various non-prototypical ways or showing different types of metaphorical extension of the causative relationship, have been mentioned in the literature but hardly any detailed studies are available. The present article focuses on non-prototypical causatives in Latvian. Three factors leading to extended use of causative morphology are discussed: metaphorical extension, different types of argument-backgrounding, and the use of frame elements in addition to arguments of the base verb in order to satisfy the valency requirements of the causative construction.
Published online: 5 August 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/vargreb.2.03hol
References (28)
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Yu. 2011. Causatives which do not cause: Non-valency-increasing effects of a valency-increasing derivation. In Language at Large. Essays on Syntax and Semantics [Empirical Approaches to Linguistic Theory, 2], Alexandra Yu. Aikhenvald & Robert M.W. Dixon (eds), 86–142. Leiden/Boston: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ambrazas, Vytautas (ed). 1997. Lithuanian Grammar. Vilnius: Baltos lankos.Google Scholar
Anderson, Cori. 2011. Case theory and case alternations: Evidence from Lithuanian. Baltic Linguistics 2: 9–35.Google Scholar
Bergmane, Anna, Grabis, Rūdolfs, Lepika, Milda, & Sokols, Ēvalds (eds). 1959. Mūsdienu latviešu literārās valodas gramatika. I. Fonētika un morfoloģija [Grammar of the contemporary Latvian standard language. I. Phonetics and morphology]. Rīga: Latvijas PSR Zinātņu akadēmijas izdevniecība.Google Scholar
Bielenstein, August. 1863. Handbuch der lettischen Sprache I. Grammatik. Mitau: Fr. Lucas’ Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
. 1863/1864. Die lettische Sprache nach ihren Lauten und Formen vergleichend und erklärend dargestellt. Vols. 1–2. Berlin: Ferdinand Dümmler.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W. 2000. A typology of causatives: form, syntax and meaning. In Changing Valency. Case Studies in Transitivity, Robert M.W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds), 30–83. Cambridge: University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Endzelin, J[an]. 1923. Lettische Grammatik. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Hetzron, Robert. 1976. On the Hungarian causative and its syntax. In Syntax and Semantics 6. The Grammar of Causative Constructions, Masayoshi Shibatani (ed), 371–398. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56(2): 251–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. 1976. Towards a universal definition of ‘subject’. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed), 303–333. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne & Verhagen, Arie. 1994. The grammar of causatives and the conceptual structure of events. Cognitive Linguistics 5(2): 115–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kittilä, Seppo. 2009. Causative morphemes as non-valency-increasing devices. Folia Linguistica 43(1): 67–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid I. 1999. Split causativity. Remarks on correlations between transitivity, aspect, and tense. In Tense-Aspect, Transitivity and Causativity. Essays in Honour of Vladimir Nedjalkov, Werner Abraham & Leonid Kulikov (eds), 21–24. Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Causatives. In Language Typology and Language Universals. An International Handbook, Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds), 886–898. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy. 1956. L’apophonie en indo-européen. Wrocław etc.: Ossolineum.Google Scholar
Lipiński, Edward. 1997. Semitic Languages. Outline of a Comparative Grammar. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
LLVV = Latviešu literārās valodas vārdnīca [Dictionary of the Latvian Literary Language]. Vols. 1–8, Rīga: Zinātne.
ME = Karl Mühlenbach & Jan Endzelin, Lettisch-deutsches Wörterbuch, ergänzt und fortgesetzt von Janis Endzelin. i–iv. Riga: Lettisches Bildungsministerium.
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. & Sil’nickij, Georgij G. 1969a. Tipologija kauzativnyx konstrukcij. In Tipologija kauzativnyx konstrukcij. Morfologičeskij kauzativ [Typology of Causative Constructions. The Morphological Causative], Aleksandr Xolodovič (ed), 5–19. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
. 1969b. Tipologija morfologičeskogo i leksičeskogo kauzativov. In Tipologija kauzativnyx konstrukcij. Morfologičeskij kauzativ [Typology of Causative Constructions. The Morphological Causative], Aleksandr Xolodovič (ed), 20–50. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P., Otaina, Galina A. & Xolodovič, Aleksandr A. 1969. Morfologičeskij i leksičeskij kauzativy v nivxskom jazyke. In Tipologija kauzativnyx konstrukcij. Morfologičeskij kauzativ [Typology of Causative Constructions. The Morphological Causative], Aleksandr Xolodovič (ed), 179–199. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Ostrowski, Norbert. 2006. Studia z historii czasownika litewskiego. Iteratiwa. Denominatiwa [Studies in the History of the Lithuanian Verb. Iteratives. Denominatives]. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.Google Scholar
Paulsen, Geda. 2011. The dynamics of Finnish causative verb derivation. Prototypes and constructions. Linguistica Uralica 47.4, 273–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pennanen, Esko V. 1986. On the so-called curative verbs in Finnish. Finnisch-ugrische Forschungen 47(2–3): 163–182.Google Scholar
Song, Jae Jung. 2005. Causatives, semantics of. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Second edn., Keith Brown (ed), 265–268. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1976. Semantic causative types. In Syntax and Semantics 6: The Grammar of Causative Constructions, Masayoshi Shibatani (ed), 43–116. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 2000. Towards a Cognitive Semantics. Vols. 1/2. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Zúñiga, Fernando & Seppo Kittilä
2019. Grammatical Voice, DOI logo
Holvoet, Axel & Nicole Nau
2016. Introduction. In Argument Realization in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 3], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. The Middle Voice in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 5], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.