References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. Y
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y
2012The essence of mirativity. Linguistic Typology 16: 435–485. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ambrazas, Vytautas
(ed.) 1996Lithuanian Grammar. Vilnius: Baltos lankos.Google Scholar
Arkadiev, Peter M
2013Marking of subjects and objects in Lithuanian non-finite clauses: A typological and diachronic perspective. Linguistic Typology 17: 397–437. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blevins, James P
2003Passives and impersonals. Journal of Linguistics, 39: 473–520. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
CCL = Corpus of Contemporary Lithuanian
Christen, Simon
1995Morphologische und syntaktische Eigenschaften des Subjekts im Litauischen. Inauguraldissertation, Universität Bern.
Culicover, Peter W. & Ray Jackendoff
2005Simpler syntax. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geniušienė, Emma Š
2006Passives in Lithuanian (in comparison with Russian). In Passivization and Typology: Form and Function, Werner Abraham & Larisa Leisiö (eds.), 29–61. Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1973Passivnye konstrukcii v litovskom jazyke [Passive constructions in the Lithuanian language]. PhD dissertation, Vilnius University.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2001Non-canonical marking of core arguments in the languages of European languages. In Non-canonical marking of subjects and objects, Alexandra Aikhenvald, R.M.W. Dixon & Masayuki Onishi (eds.), 53–84. Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holvoet, Axel & Marta Grzybowska
2014Non-canonical grammatical relations in a modal construction. The Latvian debitive. In Grammatical Relations and their Non-canonical Encoding in Baltic, Axel Holvoet & Nicole Nau (eds.), 97–135. Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holvoet, Axel & Nicole Nau
2014Argument marking and grammatical relations in Baltic: An overview. In Grammatical Relations and their Non-canonical Encoding in Baltic, Axel Holvoet & Nicole Nau (eds.), 97–135. Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holvoet, Axel
2007Mood and Modality in Baltic. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.Google Scholar
2009Difuziniai subjektai ir objektai [Diffuse subjects and objects]. In Gramatinių funkcijų prigimtis ir raiška (Acta Salensia 1), Axel Holvoet & Rolandas Mikulskas (red.), 37–67. Vilnius: Vilnius University & Association Academia Salensis.Google Scholar
Holvoet, Axel & Loreta Semėnienė
2005Veiksnio ir tiesioginio papildinio sąvokos [The notions of subject and object]. In Gramatinių funkcijų tyrimai. Lietuvių kalbos gramatikos darbai 3, Axel Holvoet & Rolandas Mikulskas (red.), Vilnius: Lietuvių kalbos institutas.Google Scholar
Jakulienė, Audronė
1968Lietuvių kalbos pasyvo formavimasis ir sangrąžiniai veiksmažodžiai. Baltistica 4 (2): 211–220.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. & Matthew S. Dryer
2007Passive in the world’s languages. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description vol. 1, Clause Structure, 2nd edn., Timothy Shopen (ed.), 325–361. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kibort, Anna
2004Passive and passive-like constructions in English and Polish. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
2006On three different types of subjectlessness and how to model them in LFG. In Proceedings of the LFG06 Conference, University of Konstanz, Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds.), 289–309. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
2011The elephant in the room: the impersonal -ne/-te construction in Polish. In Impersonal Constructions: A Cross-linguistic Perspective, Andrej Malchukov & Anna Siewierska (eds.), 357–394. Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lavine, James E
1999Subject properties and ergativity in North Russian and Lithuanian. In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 7, Katarzyna Dziwirek, Herbert Coats & Cynthia Vakareliyska (eds.), 307–328. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
2006Is there a passive evidential strategy in Lithuanian? In Papers from the 42nd Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Jacqueline Bunting et al. (eds), 41–55.Google Scholar
2010Mood and a transitivity restriction in Lithuanian: The case of the inferential evidential. Baltic Linguistics 1: 115–142.Google Scholar
2013Passives and near-passives in Balto-Slavic: On the survival of the accusative. In Non-canonical Passives, Artemis Alexiadou & Florian Schäfer (eds.), 185–212. Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej & Anna Siewierska
2011Introduction. In Impersonal Constructions: A Cross-linguistic Perspective, Andrej Malchukov & Anna Siewierska (eds.), 1–18. Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manninen, Satu & Diane Nelson
2004What is a passive? The case of Finnish. Studia Linguistica 58 (3): 212–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nerbonne, John A
1982Some passives not characterized by universal rules: subjectless impersonals. In Grammatical relations and Relational Grammar (Working Papers in Linguistics 26), B.D. Joseph (ed.), 59–92. Columbus: Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Onishi, Masayuki
2001Introduction: Non-canonically marked subjects and objects: Parameters and Properties. In Non-canonical marking of subjects and objects, Alexandra Aikhenvald, R.M.W. Dixon & Masayuki Onishi (eds.), 1–52. Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perlmutter, David M
1978Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. In Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, J. Jaeger, A. Woodbury, F. Ackerman, C. Chiareno, O.D. Gensler, J. Kingston, E.E. Sweetser, H. Thompson & K.W. Whistler (eds.), 157–189.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul M
1986Studies of Passive Clauses. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Rappaport, Gilbert C
1986On Anaphor Binding in Russian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 4 (1): 97–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seržant, Ilja A
2012The so-called possessive perfect in North Russian and the Circum-Baltic area. A diachronic and areal approach. Lingua 122 (4): 356–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Timberlake, Alan
1982The impersonal passive in Lithuanian. In Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 8: 508–524.Google Scholar
Wiemer, Björn
2006aGrammatical evidentiality in Lithuanian (a typological assessment). Baltistica 41 (1): 33-49.Google Scholar
2006bRelations between Actor-demoting devices in Lithuanian. In Passivization and Typology: Form and Function, Werner Abraham & Larisa Leisiö (eds.), 274–309. Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willet, Thomas
Žeimantienė, Vaiva
2000Das Passiv im Deutschen und die Entsprechungen im Litauischen aus morphologisch-syntaktischer, semantischer sowie funktionaler Sicht. Doktordissertation. Universität Vilnius.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Arkadiev, Peter M. & Björn Wiemer
2020. Chapter 5. Perfects in Baltic and Slavic. In Perfects in Indo-European Languages and Beyond [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 352],  pp. 124 ff. DOI logo
Mazzitelli, Lidia Federica
2019. Referential and pragmatic-discourse properties of Lithuanian reference impersonals: 2sg-imp, 3-imp and ma/ta-imp. Kalbotyra 72  pp. 32 ff. DOI logo
SIGURÐSSON, EINAR FREYR & MILENA ŠEREIKAITĖ
2024. The dual face of structural object case: on Lithuanian genitive of negation. Journal of Linguistics 60:1  pp. 161 ff. DOI logo
Usonienė, Aurelija & Nigel Vincent
2018. Chapter 11. Non-finiteness, complementation and evidentiality. In Tense, Aspect, Modality, and Evidentiality [Studies in Language Companion Series, 197],  pp. 239 ff. DOI logo
Wiemer, Björn & Vaiva Žeimantienė
Šereikaitė, Milena
2021. Active Existential in Lithuanian: Remarks on Burzio’s Generalization. Linguistic Inquiry 52:4  pp. 747 ff. DOI logo
Šereikaitė, Milena
2022. Impersonals, passives, and impersonal pronouns: Lessons from Lithuanian. Syntax 25:2  pp. 188 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.