Article published in:
Argument Realization in Baltic
Edited by Axel Holvoet and Nicole Nau
[Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic 3] 2016
► pp. 37–82
Published online: 21 January 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/vargreb.3.01ark
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

No author info given
2021.  In The Perfect Volume [Studies in Language Companion Series, 217], Crossref logo
Arkadiev, Peter
2017. Multiple ergatives. Studies in Language 41:3 ► pp. 717 ff. Crossref logo
Fábregas, Antonio & Raquel González Rodríguez
2020. On inhibited eventualities. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 38:3 ► pp. 729 ff. Crossref logo
Wiemer, Björn, Kirill Kozhanov & Aksana Erker
2019. The TriMCo corpus of Slavic and Baltic dialects: structure, goals and case studies. Balto-Slavic Studies :XX ► pp. 122 ff. Crossref logo
Šereikaitė, Milena
2020. Active Existential in Lithuanian: Remarks on Burzio’s Generalization. Linguistic Inquiry ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References
Ambrazas, Vytautas
1987 Die indogermanische Grundlage des Dativus und Nominativus cum infinitivo im Baltischen. Indogermanische Forschungen 92: 203–219.Google Scholar
2001 On the development of the nominative object in East Baltic. In: The Circum-Baltic Languages. Typology and Contact. Vol. 2. Grammar and Typology, Östen Dahl and Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds.), 391–412. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1997 Lithuanian Grammar. Vilnius: Baltos Lankos.Google Scholar
Arkadiev, Peter
2012 Participial complementation in Lithuanian. In: Clause Linkage in Cross-Linguistic Perspective: Data-Driven Approaches to Cross-Clausal Syntax, Volker Gast and Holger Diessel (eds.), 285–334. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 Case and word order in Lithuanian infinitival clauses revisited. In: Grammatical Relations and their Non-Canonical Encoding in Baltic, Axel Holvoet and Nicole Nau (eds.), 43–95. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 Negative events: Evidence from Lithuanian. In: Donum semanticum: Opera linguistica et logica in honorem Barbarae Partee a discipulis amicisque Rossicis oblata, Peter Arkadiev, Ivan Kapitonov, Yury Lander, Ekaterina Rakhilina and Sergei Tatevosov (eds.), 7–20. Moscow: LRC.Google Scholar
Babby, Leonard H.
2009 The Syntax of Argument Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berg-Olsen, Sturla
2000 The Latvian non-prepositional genitive – a case losing ground. Res Balticae 6: 95–146.Google Scholar
2004 The Latvian Dative and Genitive: A Cognitive Grammar Account. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Oslo.
Bielenstein, August Johann Gottfried
1863 Lettische Grammatik. Mitau: Fr. Lucas’ Buchhandlung.
Błaszczak, Joanna
2003 Genitive of negation constructions in Polish: A challenge to Chomsky’s Minimalist Inquiries? Ms., University of Potsdam.
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen, Enfield, Nicholas J., Essegbey, James, Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide, Kita, Sotaro, Lüpke, Friederike, and Ameka, Felix K.
2007 Principles of event segmentation in language: The case of motion events. Language 83 (3): 495–532. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brattico, Pauli
2012 Long-distance case assignment in Finnish. Studia Linguistica 66 (3): 245–285. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Sue & Franks, Stephen
1995 Asymmetries in the scope of Russian negation. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 3 (2): 239–287.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
2000 Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels and Juan Uriagereka (eds), 89–115. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Endzelin, Jānis
1922 Lettische Grammatik. Riga: A. Gulbis.Google Scholar
Erelt, Mati
(ed.) 2003 Estonian Language. Tallinn: Estonian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Franks, Stephen & Lavine, James E.
2006 Case and word order in Lithuanian. Journal of Linguistics 42 (1): 239–288. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
2006 Constructions at Work. The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gronemeyer, Claire & Usonienė, Aurelija
2001 Complementation in Lithuanian. In Claire Gronemeyer, Laying the Boundaries of Syntax: Studies in the Interfaces between Syntax, Semantics and Lexicon, 105–135. Lund: Lund University.Google Scholar
Holvoet, Axel
2007 Mood and Modality in Baltic. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.Google Scholar
Holvoet, Axel & Nau, Nicole
2014 Argument marking and grammatical relations in Baltic. An overview. In: Grammatical Relations and their Non-Canonical Encoding in Baltic, Axel Holvoet and Nicole Nau (eds.), 1–41. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A.
1980 Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56 (2): 251–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ilc, Gašper
2011 Optionality of the Genitive (of Negation) in Slovene. In: Formalization of Grammar in Slavic Languages. Contributions of the Eighth International Conference on Formal Description of Slavic Languages – FDSL VIII 2009 University of Potsdam, December 2–5 2009, Peter Kosta and Lilia Schurcks (eds.), 193–206. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kagan, Olga
2012 Semantics of Genitive Objects in Russian. A Study of Genitive of Negation and Intensional Genitive Case. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Kalėdaitė, Violeta
2008 Language-specific existential sentence types: A case study of Lithuanian. Kalbotyra 59 (3): 128–137. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria & Wälchli, Bernhard
2001 The Circum-Baltic languages: An areal-typological approach. In: The Circum-Baltic Languages. Typology and Contact, Östen Dahl and Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds.), vol. 2, 615–750. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krasovitsky, Alexander, Baerman, Matthew, Brown, Dunstan & Corbett, Greville G.
2011 Changing semantic factors in case selection: Russian evidence from the last two centuries. Morphology 21 (2): 573–592. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krivickij, Aleksandr A. & Podlužnyj, Aleksandr I.
1994 Učebnik belorusskogo jazyka. Dlja samoobrazovanija [A Manual of Belorussian for Self-Learning]. Minsk: Vyšèjšaja škola.Google Scholar
Landau, Idan
2004 The scale of finiteness and the calculus of control. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 811–877. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 Two routes of control: Evidence from case transmission in Russian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26: 877–924. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyutikova, Ekaterina A.
2010 K voprosu o kategorial’nom statuse imennyx grupp v russkom jazyke [On the categorial status of Russian noun phrases]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 9. Filologija 6: 36–76.Google Scholar
Markus, Elena & Rožanskij, Fedor
2011 Sovremennyj vodskij jazyk. Teksty i grammatičeskij očerk. T. 2 [Modern Votic. Texts and Grammatical Sketch. Vol. 2] St Petersburg: Nestor-Istorija.Google Scholar
Mathiassen, Terje
1996 A Short Grammar of Lithuanian. Columbus, Ohio: Slavica.Google Scholar
Mazzitelli, Lidia Federica
2010 Il fenomeno dell’alternanza genitivo-accusativo per l’espressione dell’oggetto diretto in presenza di negazione in bielorusso. In: Lingue slave in evoluzione: studi di grammatica e semantica, Rosanna Benacchio and Luisa Ruvoletto (eds.), 139–148. Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar
McFadden, Thomas
2010 Structural case, locality and cyclicity. In: Explorations of Phase Theory: Features and Arguments, Kleanthes K. Grohmann (ed.), 107–130. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Menantaud, Henri
1999 La négation comme catégorie grammaticale en polonais et en lituanien. Cahiers de Linguistique de l’INALCO 1-2: 43–57.
2007 Note sur une alternance morphologique induite par la négation dans les langues baltes modernes (letton et lituanien). In: La négation, Christian Touratier and Charles Zaremba (eds.), 91–99. Aix-en-Provence: Presses universitaires de Provence.Google Scholar
Miestamo, Matti
2014 Partitives and negation: A cross-linguistic survey. In: Partitive Cases and Related Categories, Silvia Luraghi and Toomas Huumo (eds.), 63–86. Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Nau, Nicole
1998 Latvian. München & Newcastle: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar
2011 A Short Grammar of Latgalian. München, Newcastle: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar
2014 Differential object marking in Latgalian. In: Grammatical Relations and their Non-Canonical Encoding in Baltic, Axel Holvoet and Nicole Nau (eds.), 207–255. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nītiņa, Daina & Grigorjevs, Juris
(red) 2013 Latviešu valodas gramatika [A Latvian Grammar]. Rīga: Latvijas Universitāte.Google Scholar
Padučeva, Elena V.
2006 Genitiv dopolnenija v otricatel’nom predloženii [The genitive of the object in negative sentences]. Voprosy jazykoznanija 6: 21–43.Google Scholar
Pereltsvaig, Asya
2006 Small nominals. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 24 (2): 433–500. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Przepiórkowski, Adam
2000 Long-distance genitive of negation in Polish. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 8: 119–158.Google Scholar
Raxilina, Ekaterina V.
. (red) 2008 Ob’’ektnyj genitiv pri otricanii v russkom jazyke [The Object Genitive of Negation in Russian]. Moscow: Probel-2000.
Reindl, Donald F.
2008 Language Contact: German and Slovenian. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Scholze, Lenka
2007 Das grammatische System der obersorbischen Umgangssprache unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Sprachkontakts. PhD Dissertation, Universität Konstanz.
Sirtautas, Vytautas
1971 Konstrukcijų buvo matyti, girdėti … struktūra. Kalbotyra 22 (1): 71–79.Google Scholar
Sjögren, J. Andreas
1861 Livische Grammatik nebst Sprachproben. [Gesammelte Schriften. Bd. II. Th. I.] St Petersburg: Commissionäre der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Šukys, Jonas
1998 Lietuvių kalbos linksniai ir prielinksniai: vartosena ir normos [Lithuanian Cases and Prepositions: Usage and Norms]. Kaunas: Šviesa.Google Scholar
Švambarytė, Janina
1998 Objekto galininko ir kilmininko linksnių kaita prie neiginio J. Basanavičiaus publikuotuose pasakojamosios tautosakos rinkiniuose [The alternation of genitive and accusative under negation in the folklore collections published by J. Basanavičius]. Lituanistica 3 (35): 53–60.Google Scholar
1999 Neiginio objekto raiška: genityvas ar akuzatyvas [The expression of the object under negation: Genitive or accusative]. Linguistica Lettica 5: 72–82.Google Scholar
Timberlake, Alan
1986 Hierarchies in the genitive of negation. In: Case in Slavic, Richard Brecht and James Levine (eds.), 338–360. Columbus (OH): Slavica.Google Scholar
Tsunoda, Tasaku
1981 Split case-marking patterns in verb-types and tense/aspect/mood. Linguistics 19 (5/6): 389–438.
Ulvydas, Kazys
. (red) 1976 Lietuvių kalbos gramatika. T. 3. Sintaksė. [Lithuanian Grammar. Vol. 3. Syntax] Vilnius: Mokslas.Google Scholar
van Helden, W. Andries
2008 Vicissitudes of the genitive rule. In: Dutch Contributions to the Fourteenth International Congress of Slavists, Ohrid, September 10–16 2008. Linguistics, Peter Houtzagers, Janneke Kalsbeek and Jos Schaeken (eds.), 145–216. Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Willis, David
2013 Negation in the history of the Slavonic languages. In: The History of Negation in the Languages of Europe and the Mediterranean, David Willis, Christopher Lucas and Anne Breitbarth (eds.), 341–398. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Witkoś, Jacek
1996 On NegP and the structure of the Polish clause. Papers and Studies in Contrastive Linguistics 31: 65–96.Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, Susi
2001 Infinitives. Restructuring and Clause Structure. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.