Article published in:
Argument Realization in Baltic
Edited by Axel Holvoet and Nicole Nau
[Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic 3] 2016
► pp. 461522
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

No author info given
2020.  In The Middle Voice in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 5], Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Alexiadou, Artemis & Rathert, Monika
(eds) 2010aThe Semantics of Nominalizations Across Languages and Frameworks. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(eds) 2010bThe Syntax of Nominalizations Across Languages and Frameworks. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, Mark
1994Morphology By Itself: Stems and Inflectional Classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Baayen, Harald R. & Neijt, Anneke
1997Productivity in context: a case study of a Dutch suffix. Linguistics 35, 565–587. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Christen, Simon
2001Genitive positions in Baltic and Finnic languages. In Circum-Baltic Languages. Volume 2: Grammar and Typology, Östen Dahl and Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds), 499–520. Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
2011Action nominals between verbs and nouns. Rivista di Linguistica 23 (1), 7–20.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard & Thompson, Sandra A.
2007Lexical nominalization. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Timothy Shopen (ed). Second edition. Vol. iii: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, 334–381. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dik, S.C.
1985Formal and semantic adjustment of derived constructions. In Predicates and Terms in Functional Grammar, A. Machtelt Bolkestein, Casper de Groot and J. Lachlan Mackenzie (eds.), 1–28. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U.
1982Zum Verhältnis von Wortbildung und Textlinguistik. In Text vs. Sentence Continued, János Petöfi (ed.), 96–106. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Geniušienė, Emma
1987The Typology of Reflexives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane Barbara
1990Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1996Word-class changing inflection and morphological theory. In Yearbook of Morphology 1995, Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds), 43–66. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011On S, A, P, T, and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology. Linguistic Typology 15, 535–567. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Sims, Andrea D.
2010Understanding Morphology. 2nd edition. London: Hodder Education.
Heinold, Simone Beatrice
2010Verbal Properties of Deverbal Nominals. An Aspectual Analysis of French, German and English. PhD Thesis Universität Stuttgart.
Holvoet, Axel
2001Studies in the Latvian Verb. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońs-kiego.Google Scholar
2015Non-canonical subjects in Latvian: an obliqueness-based approach. In Contemporary Approaches to Baltic Linguistics, Peter M. Arkadiev, Björn Wiemer, and Axel Holvoet (eds), 299–323. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holvoet, Axel & Nicole Nau
2014Argument marking and grammatical relations in Baltic: An overview. In Grammatical Relations and their Non-Canonical Encoding in Baltic, Axel Holvoet and Nicole Nau (eds), 1–41. Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holvoet, Axel, Grzybowska, Marta & Rembiałkowska, Agnieszka
2015Middle voice reflexives and argument structure in Baltic. In Voice and Argument Structure in Baltic, Axel Holvoet and Nicole Nau (eds), 181–209. Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kalme, Vilma & Smiltniece, Gunta
2001Latviešu literārās valodas vārddarināšana un morfoloģija [Standard Latvian word-formation and morphology]. Liepāja: LiePA.Google Scholar
Kalnača, Andra & Lokmane, Ilze
2010Defective paradigms of reflexive nouns and participles in Latvian. Proceedings of the British Academy 163, 53–67.
2012The semantics and distribution of Latvian reflexive verbs. In Multiple Perspectives in Linguistic Research on Baltic Languages, Aurelija Usonienė, Nicole Nau, and Ineta Dabašinskienė (eds), 229–256. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria
1993Nominalizations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2003Action nominal constructions in the languages of Europe. In Noun Phrase Structure in the Languages of Europe, Frans Plank (ed), 723–759. Berlin–New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2006Nominalization. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. 2nd edition, Keith Brown (ed), Vol. 8, 652–659. Amsterdam: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Action nominal constructions. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer and Martin Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/62, Accessed on 2014-03-30.)Google Scholar
Forthcoming. Nominalizations. To appear in: Word-Formation. A Handbook of the Languages of Europe, Peter O. Müller, et al. (eds) Berlin De Gruyter
Levāne-Petrova, Kristīne
2012Līdzsvarots mūsdienu latviešu valodas tekstu korpuss un tā tekstu atlases kritēriji [Selection criteria for a balanced corpus of contemporary Latvian texts]. Baltistica VIII Priedas, 89–98.Google Scholar
2013Latviešu valodas gramatika [Grammar of Latvian], Juris Grigorjevs and Daina Nītiņa (eds.). Riga: LU Latviešu valodas institūts.Google Scholar
Lipka, Leonhard
1987Word-formation and text in English and German. In Neuere Forschungen zur Wortbildung und Historiographie der Linguistik, Brigitte Asbach-Schnittker and Johannes Roggenhofer (eds), 59–67. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, J.L.
1985Nominalization and valency reduction. In Predicates and Terms in Functional Grammar, A. Machtelt Bolkestein, Casper de Groot and J. Lachlan Mackenzie (eds.), 29–47. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Lachlan. Ms
Nouns are avalent – and nominalizations too. (Availabe online at: http://​www​.academia​.edu​/1077018​/Nouns​_are​_avalent​_-​_and​_nominalizations​_too. Accessed 2015-08-20).
Malchukov, Andrej L.
2004Nominalization/Verbalization: Constraining a Typology of Transcategorial Operations. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
2006Constraining nominalization: function/form competition. Linguistics 44 (5), 973–1008. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malouf, Robert
2006Mixed categories. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. 2nd edition, Keith Brown (ed), vol. 8, 174–185. Amsterdam: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1959Mūsdienu latviešu literārās valodas grammatika I. Fonētika un morfoloģija [Grammar of contemporary Latvian I. Phonetics and morphology], Anna Bergmane, et al. (eds). Rīga: Latvijas PSR Zinātņu akadēmijas izdevniecība.Google Scholar
Nau, Nicole
1998Latvian. (Languages of the World / Materials 217) München–Newcastle: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
2013Latvian agent nouns: their meaning, grammar, and use. Baltic Linguistics 4, 79–131.Google Scholar
2015Word formation, syntax, and register: Latvian action nouns in -šana. In Contributions to Morphology and Syntax. Proceedings of the 4th Greifswald University Conference on Baltic Languages, Artūras Judžentis and Stephan Kessler (eds), 149–178. Berlin: Logos Verlag.Google Scholar
Soida, Emīlija
2009Vārddarināšana [Word-formation]. Rīga: LU Akadēmiskais apgads.Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew
2010Factorizing lexical relatedness. In: New Impulses in Word-Formation [Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 17], Susan Olsen (ed), 133–171.Google Scholar
2013Lexical Relatedness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Andrew & Zaretskaya, Marina
1998Stative predicates in Russian and their nominalizations. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics, 22: 1–44.Google Scholar
Štekauer, Pavol, Salvador Valera & Lívia Körtélyessy
2012Word-Formation in the World’s Languages: A Typological Survey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref
Ylikoski, Jukka
2003Defining non-finites: Action nominals, converbs and infinitives. SKY Journal of Linguistics 16, 185–237.Google Scholar