Article published in:The Evolution of Englishes: The Dynamic Model and beyond
Edited by Sarah Buschfeld, Thomas Hoffmann, Magnus Huber and Alexander Kautzsch
[Varieties of English Around the World G49] 2014
► pp. 160–180
The cognitive evolution of Englishes
The role of constructions in the dynamic model
Schneider’s Dynamic Model (2007) predicts that it is the lexicon-syntax interface that exhibits first traces of the emergence of characteristic structural innovations during the phase of Nativization. In this paper, I will show how a Construction Grammar approach provides a cognitive explanation for this phenomenon. I will then illustrate the advantages of a Construction Grammar analysis by focussing on Comparative Correlative (CC) constructions (e.g. The higher the price is, the more interesting the product is.; cf. Fillmore et al. 1988; Sag 2010). As the statistical analysis of data from various corpora from the International Corpus of English project show, all varieties exhibit similar processing effects, but differ greatly with respect to their reliance on partly substantive, partly schematic meso-constructions.
Keywords: Construction Grammar, constructions, lexis-syntax cline, Nativization
Published online: 12 September 2014
Cited by 4 other publications
No author info given
Deshors, Sandra C. & Stefan Th. Gries
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, Jason Grafmiller, Benedikt Heller & Melanie Röthlisberger
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 june 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Abeillé, A., Borsley, R.D. & Espinal, M.-T.
2006 The syntax of comparative correlatives in French and Spanish. In Proceedings of the HPSG06 Conference , S. Müller (ed.), 6–26.Stanford CA: CSLI. <http://csli-publications.stanford.edu/HPSG/7/hpsg06.pdf> (02 March 2014).
Baker, P. & Huber, M.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E.
2008 Comparative and equative correlatives as anaphora to differentials. Poster presented at Semantics and Linguistic Theory 18, University of Massachusetts Amherst, and at the 9th Semfest, Stanford CA.
Culicover, P.W. & Jackendoff, R.
de Saussure, F.
2013 Construction Grammar and First Language Acquisition. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (eds), 347–364.
2013 Construction Grammar and Second Language Acquisition. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (eds), 365–378.
1987 Varieties of conditional sentences. Proceedings of the Eastern States Conference on Linguistics 3: 163–182.
Fillmore, C.J., Kay, P. & O’Connor, M.C.
2004 Coll.analysis 3. A Program for R for Windows 2.x. <http://www.linguistics.ucsb.edu/faculty/stgries/teaching/groningen/coll.analysis.r> (02 March 2014).
2013 Abstract phrasal and clausal constructions. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (eds), 307–328.
In prep. Comparing English Comparative Correlatives: Diachronic and Synchronic Variation at the Lexicon-Syntax Interface.
Hoffmann, T. & Trousdale, G.
2013a Construction Grammar: Introduction. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (eds), 1–12.
Hoffmann, T. & Trousdale, G.
2013 Constructions in Cognitive Sociolinguistics. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (eds), 491–509.
Hudson-Ettle, D.M. & Schmied, J.
Le Page, R. & Tabouret-Keller, A.
Nelson, G., Wallis, S. & Aarts, B.
Pullum, G.K. & Huddleston, R.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J.
Stefanowitsch, A. & Gries, S.T.
Szmrecsanyi, B. & Kortmann, B.
Van Rooy, B.