Cover not available
Part of
The Evolution of Englishes: The Dynamic Model and beyond
Edited by Sarah Buschfeld, Thomas Hoffmann, Magnus Huber and Alexander Kautzsch
[Varieties of English Around the World G49] 2014
► pp. 282–300

The evolution of English(es)

Notes on the history of an idea

Many of the central tenets of modern linguistics – and thus also of the study of World Englishes – have a history which goes back to the nineteenth century. This article focuses on the idea of the evolution of language(s). I will employ a discourse-historical approach to show that evolution was generally taken to imply not only progress but also hierarchization, and that English and its standard variety – as well as their speakers – were inevitably seen as the most progressive and placed at the top of any linguistic hierarchy. Of course, crude nationalist and racist thinking are no longer current in academic linguistics today; nevertheless, this article will claim that in order to fully comprehend contemporary ideologies of language, we need to understand the historical origins of the assumptions and beliefs upon which they rest.
Keywords: (varieties of) English, evolution, historical discourse analysis, ideologies of language
Published online: 12 September 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g49.16hac
References (52)
Aarsleff, H. 1967. The Study of Language in England, 1780–1860. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bailey, R.W. 1991. Images of English: A Cultural History of the Language. Ann Arbor MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
. 1996. Nineteenth-Century English. Ann Arbor MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
. 2003. The ideology of English in the long eighteenth century. In Insights into Late Modern English, M. Dossena & C. Jones (eds), 21–44. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. 1999. The debate is open. In Language Ideological Debates, J. Blommaert (ed.), 1–3. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolton, W.F. & Crystal, D. (eds). 1969. The English Language. Vol. 2: Essays by Linguists and Men of Letters 1858–1964. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bowring, J. 1995 [1863]. Primitive language. In R. Harris (ed.), 386–392. First published in Cornhill Magazine 8.Google Scholar
Crowley, T. 2003. Standard English and the Politics of Language, 2nd edn. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
De Quincey, T. 1995 [1839]. The English language. In R. Harris (ed.), 78–89. First published in Blackwood’s Magazine 45.Google Scholar
Donovan, J. 1995 [1899]. A new approach to the problem of the origin of language. In R. Harris (ed.), 449–463. First published in Westminster Review 151.Google Scholar
Errington, J. 2001. Colonial linguistics. Annual Review of Anthropology 30: 19–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Linguistics in a Colonial World. A Story of Language, Meaning, and Power. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Garner, R.L. 1995 [1891–92]. The Simian tongue. In R. Harris (ed.), 375–390. First published in New Review 4–6.Google Scholar
Gellner, E. 1995. Anthropology and Politics: Revolutions in the Sacred Grove. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hackert, S. 2012. The Emergence of the English Native Speaker: A Chapter in Nineteenth-Century Linguistic Thought. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, F. 1969 [1880]. English rational and irrational. In W.F. Bolton & D. Crystal (eds), 30–53. First published in The Nineteenth Century 43.Google Scholar
Harris, R. (ed.). 1995a. Language and Linguistics. Vol.1: English Language and Language-
Teaching 1800–1865.London: Routledge / Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
(ed.). 1995b. Language and Linguistics. Vol.2: English Language and Language-
Teaching 1865–1900. London: Routledge & Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
(ed.). 1995c. Language and Linguistics. Vol.3: Language and Linguistic Theory 
1800–1865. London: Routledge & Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
(ed.). 1995d. Language and Linguistics. Vol.4: Language and Linguistic Theory 
1865–1900. London: Routledge & Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Harris, R. & Talbot J.T. 1989. Landmarks in Linguistic Thought: The Western Tradition from Socrates to Saussure. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
von Humboldt, W. 1836. Über die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren Einfluss auf die geistige Entwickelung des Menschengeschlechts. Berlin: F. Dümmler.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. 1946. Mankind, Nation and Individual From a Linguistic Point of View. London: Allen & Unwin. First published in Oslo: Aschehoug, 1925.Google Scholar
. 1993 [1894]. Progress in Language. With Special Reference to English. New edition with an introduction by J.D. McCawley. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnston, C. 1995 [1899]. The primæval language. In R. Harris (ed.), 464–472. First published in Contemporary Review 76.Google Scholar
Kern, R. 1996. Orientalism, Modernism, and the American Poem. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. 1972. The logic of nonstandard English. In Language in the Inner City. Studies in the Black English Vernacular, W. Labov (ed.), 201–240. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Marenbon, J. 1991[1987]. English our English: The new orthodoxy examined. In Proper English? Readings in Language, History and Cultural Identity, T. Crowley, 245–260. London: Routledge. First published by the Centre for Policy Studies.Google Scholar
Marsh, G.P. 1859. Address. In Inaugural Addresses of Theodore W. Dwight, Professor of Law, and of George P. Marsh, Professor of English Literature, in Columbia College, New York. New York NY: By Authority of the Trustees. [URL] (15 December 2005).Google Scholar
Mathews, W. 1876. Words: Their Use and Abuse. Chicago IL: Griggs.Google Scholar
McCawley, J.D. 1993. Introduction. In O. Jespersen (ed.), IX–XVIII.
Meyer, A. 2007. Das missverstandene Buch. InDie Zeit, 2007-07-19. [URL] (19 April 2009).Google Scholar
Milroy, J. 2001. Language ideologies and the consequences of standardization. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5(4): 530–555. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, S. 2001. The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Race, racialism, and the study of language in America. In LAVIS III – Language Variety in the South: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives, M. Picone & K. Davis (eds). Tuscaloosa AL: University of Alabama Press. [URL] (27 November 2013).Google Scholar
Müller, M. 1862. Lectures on the Science of Language Delivered at the Royal Institution of Great Britain in April, May, and June, 1861. New York NY: Scribner.Google Scholar
. 1995 [1863]. Introductory lecture on the science of language. In R. Harris (ed.), 369–385. First published in Macmillan’s Magazine 7.Google Scholar
Nicol, H. 1995 [1872]. English philology. In R. Harris (ed.), 103–121. First published in Westminster Review 42.Google Scholar
Paul, H. 1890. Principles of the History of Language. Trans. H.A. Strong. London: Sonnenschein. Originally published in German 1880: Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Halle: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. 1998. English and the Discourses of Colonialism. London, New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sayce, A.H. 1874. The Principles of Comparative Philology. London: Trübner.Google Scholar
Schleicher, A. 1873 [1863]. Die Darwinsche Theorie und die Sprachwissenschaft, 3rd edn. Weimar: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Schneider, E.W. 2003. The dynamics of New Englishes: From identity construction to dialect birth. Language 79(2): 233–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. English around the World: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Singh, J. 1996. Colonial Narratives / Cultural Dialogues: “Discoveries” of India in the Language of Colonialism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Strettell, A. 1995 [1851]. Comparative philology. In R. Harris (ed.), 163–192. First published in North British Review 16.Google Scholar
Trench, R.C. 1927 [1851]. On the Study of Words. London: Dent & New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
Whitman, W. 1969 [1885]. Slang in America. In W.F. Bolton & D. Crystal (eds), 54–58. First published in The North American Review 141.Google Scholar
Whitney, W.D. 1875. The Life and Growth of Language. London: King.Google Scholar
Wyld, H.C. 1969 [1906]. The Historical Study of the Mother Tongue: An Introduction to Philological Method. New York NY: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Hackert, Stephanie
2022. The epicentre model and American influence on Bahamian Englishes. World Englishes 41:3 ► pp. 361 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.