Article published in:
World Englishes: New theoretical and methodological considerations
Edited by Elena Seoane and Cristina Suárez-Gómez
[Varieties of English Around the World G57] 2016
► pp. 37–60

Error, feature, (incipient) change – or something else altogether? On the role of low-frequency deviant patterns for the description of Englishes

All corpus linguists routinely come across language use that may, at first sight, appear to be erroneous: planning errors, slips of the tongue/pen or, in the case of contact varieties, evidence of interference from a substrate language. These apparent ‘errors’ are of potential interest because they may, in fact, be on their way of becoming a ‘feature’ of a contact variety or be instances of ongoing change. With respect to change in previous stages of English, we can decide in hindsight which of the three possible scenarios we are dealing with. When it comes to variation in present-day English and possible (ongoing) change, matters are more complicated. In this paper, I present a case study on an unusual auxiliary-participle combination (be been), which has the potential of being an (emergent) feature of contact varieties or an instance of (incipient) language change. I compare two kinds of evidence: acceptability judgements and metalinguistic comments, on the one hand, and data collected from a broad range of corpora, on the other hand. The findings are used not only to discuss grammaticality and norms, but also to reflect on the methodologies employed in the description of World Englishes today.
Keywords: acceptability, change, corpus methodology, language contact, perfect, progressive
Published online: 25 May 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g57.03hun
References
Anderwald, Lieselotte
2014a ‘Pained the eye and stunned the ear’: Why was the progressive passive hated so much? A case study of prescriptive comments from the nineteenth century. In Contact, Variation and Change in the History of English [Studies in Language Companion Series 159], Simone Pfenninger, Olga Timofeeva, Anne Gardner, Alpo Honkapohja, Marianne Hundt & Daniel Schreier (eds), 113–136. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014b The decline of the BE-perfect, linguistic relativity, and grammar writing in the 19th century. In Late Modern English Syntax in Context, Marianne Hundt (eds), 13–37. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Atwood, E. Bagby
1953 A Survey of Verb Forms in the Eastern United States. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Britain, David
2007 Grammatical variation in England. In Language in the British Isles, David Britain (eds), 75–104. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cassidy, Frederic C.
(ed.) 1985 Dictionary of American Regional English. Vol.1, A–C. ­Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dannenberg, Clare J.
2002 Sociolinguistic Constructs of Ethnic Identity: The Syntactic Delineation of an American Indian English [Publication of the American Dialect Society 87]. Durham NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik
2005 A corpus of Late Modern English. ICAME Journal 29: 69–82.Google Scholar
Hazen, Kirk
2008 (ING): A vernacular baseline for English in Appalachia. American Speech 83(2): 116–140. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hernández, Nuria
2006 User’s Guide to FRED (Freiburg Corpus of English Dialects). Freiburg: Albert-Ludwigs-Universität.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Sebastian, Hundt, Marianne & Mukherjee, Joybrato
2011 Indian English – an emerging epicentre? A pilot study on light-verbs in web-derived corpora of South Asian Englishes. Anglia 129: 258–280. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Magnus
2007 The Old Bailey Proceedings, 1674–1834. Evaluating and annotating a corpus of 18th- and 19th-century spoken English. In Annotating Variation and Change [Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 1], Anneli Meurman-Solin & Arja Nurmi (eds). www​.helsinki​.fi​/varieng​/journal​/volumes​/01​/huberGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Arthur, Trudgill, Peter & Watt, Dominic
2005 [1979] English Accents and Dialects: An Introduction to Social and Regional Varieties of English in the British Isles, 4th edn. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne, Hoffmann, Sebastian & Mukherjee, Joybrato
2012 The hypothetical subjunctive in South Asian Englishes – Local developments in the use of a global construction. English World-Wide 33(2): 147–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCafferty, Kevin & Amador-Moreno, Carolina P.
In preparation. CORIECOR. The Corpus of Irish English Correspondence. Bergen & Cáceres: University of Bergen & University of Extremadura. Crossref
Melchers, Gunnel
2004 English spoken in Orkney and Shetland: Morphology, syntax and lexicon. In A Handbook of Varieties of English, Vol. 2: Morphology & Syntax, Bernd Kortmann, Edgar Schneider, Kate Burridge, Rajend Mesthrie & Clive Upton (eds), 34–47. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Millar, Robert
2007 Northern and Insular Scots. Edinburgh: EUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peitsara, Kirsti & Vasko, Anna-Liisa
2002  The Helsinki Dialect Corpus: Characteristics of speech and aspects of variation. Helsinki English Studies 2. blogs​.helsinki​.fi​/hes​-eng​/files​/2011​/03​/HES​_Vol2​_Peitsara​_Vasko​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Robertson, Thomas Argyll & Graham, John
1991 [1952] Grammar and Usage of the Shetland Dialect. Lerwick: Shetland Times.Google Scholar
Sabban, Annette
1984 Investigation into the syntax of Hebridean English. Scottish Language 3: 5–32.Google Scholar
Schleef, Eric & Flynn, Nicholas
2015 Ageing meanings of (ing). Age and indexicality in Manchester, England. English World-Wide 36(1): 48–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Jennifer & Durham, Mercedes
2011 A tipping point in dialect obsolescence? Change across the generations in Lerwick, Shetland. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15(2): 197–225. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 Bidialectism or dialect death? Explaining generational change in the Shetland Islands, Scotland. American Speech 87(1): 57–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali
1997 Obsolescence in the English perfect? Evidence from Samaná English. American Speech 72(1): 33–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Warner, Anthony R.
1995 Predicting the progressive passive: Parametric change within a lexicalist framework. Language 71: 533–557. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wolfram, Walt
1996 Delineation and description in dialectology: The case of Perfective I’m in Lumbee English. American Speech 71(1): 5–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar