Article published in:
World Englishes: New theoretical and methodological considerations
Edited by Elena Seoane and Cristina Suárez-Gómez
[Varieties of English Around the World G57] 2016

On the globalization of English

Observations of subjective progressives in present-day Englishes

| University of Eastern Finland
| Linnaeus University
This article discusses the globalization of English and suggests that the changing role and nature of English in the expanding circle requires new methodological approaches and new empirical materials which better represent non-native global English(es), that is, when English is used as an additional linguistic resource alongside L1s. Our case study investigates how ongoing grammatical changes are adapted in global use, and focuses on a specific use of the progressive: the subjective sense with an intervening adverbial. Our findings corroborate those of Hundt & Vogel (2011) on the progressive in general, but also show that stretched, special uses of progressives are fully established in non-native global usage. We conclude that as the globalization of English continues to blur the neat division of the English varieties, better data is needed to take into account the diversity of texts emerging in the expanding circle and to represent a variety of text types from natural, non-instructional settings.
Keywords: American English, English in the Expanding Circle, globalization of English, subjective progressive
Published online: 25 May 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g57.10lai
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Laitinen, Mikko
2016.  In New Approaches to English Linguistics [Studies in Language Companion Series, 177], ► pp. 175 ff. Crossref logo
Laitinen, Mikko
2018.  In Modeling World Englishes [Varieties of English Around the World, G61], ► pp. 109 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

Sources

FIN-CE
In compilation. The Corpus of English in Finland. A multi-genre corpus resource of advanced non-native English texts. Director: Mikko Laitinen. Linnaeus University.
F-LOB
The Freiburg-LOB Corpus (‘F-LOB’) (original version) compiled by Christian Mair, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg.
ICLE v1. International Corpus of Learner English 2002
. Project director Sylviane Granger. Centre for English Corpus Linguistics. Université Catholique de Louvain.
LSAC. The Longman Spoken American Corpus
Owned by Pearson Education, gathered by Professor Jack Du Bois and his team at the University of California at Santa Barbara (UCSB). Available on CD-ROM.
SWE-CE. In compilation
The Corpus of English in Sweden. A multi-genre corpus resource of advanced non-native English texts. Director: Mikko Laitinen. Linnaeus University.
TIME
Time Magazine Corpus 1926–2006. Created by Mark Davies. http://​corpus​.byu​.edu​/time/ (15 March 2015).
VOICE
2013 The Vienna-Oxford International Corpus of English (version 2.0 Online). Director: Barbara Seidlhofer; Researchers: Angelika Breiteneder, Theresa Klimpfinger, Stefan Majewski, Ruth Osimk-Teasdale, Marie-Luise Pitzl, Michael Radeka. http://​voice​.univie​.ac​.at (15 March 2015).Google Scholar

References

Aijmer, Karin
2002 Modality in advanced Swedish learners’ written interlanguage. In Computer Learner Corpora, Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching [Language Learning and Language Teaching 6], Sylviane Granger, Joseph Hung & Stephanie Petch-Tyson (eds), 55–76. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, Kingsley & Meierkord, Christiane
2013 English in contemporary Sweden: Perceptions, policies, and narrated practices. Journal of Sociolinguistics 17(1): 93–117. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Peter
2009 The progressive. In Comparative Studies in Australian and New Zealand English. Grammar and Beyond [Varieties of English around the World G39], Pam Peters, Peter Collins & Adam Smith (eds), 115–123. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coto-Villalibre, Eduardo
2014 A Semantic and Syntactic Approach to Get Constructions in World Englishes. PhD dissertation, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle & Granger, Sylviane
2011 From EFL to ESL: evidence from the International Corpus of Learner English . In Mukherjee & Hundt (eds), Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap, 55–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Granger, Sylviane
2008 Learner corpora. In Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook, Anke Lüdeling & Merja Kytö (eds), 259–275. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey
2002 The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne
2004 Animacy, agency and the spread of the progressive in eighteenth- and nineteenth-century English. English Language and Linguistics 8: 47–69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne & Mair, Christian
1999 ‘Agile’ and ‘uptight’ genres: The corpus-based approach to language change in progress. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 4(2): 221–242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne & Vogel, Katrin
2011 Overuse of the progressive in ESL and learner Englishes – fact or fiction? In Mukherjee & Hundt (eds), Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap, 145–165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, Jennifer, Cogo, Alessia & Dewey, Martin
2011 Review of developments in research into English as a lingua franca. Language Teaching 44(3): 281–315. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1909–1949 A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles I–VII. Copenhagen: Ejnar Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Kachru, Braj B.
1985 Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English Language in the Outer Circle. In English in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and Literatures, Randolph Quirk & Henry Widdowson (eds), 11–30. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Killie, Kristin
2004 Subjectivity and the English progressive. English Language and Linguistics. 8(1): 25–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kranich, Svenja
2007 Subjectification and the English progressive. The history of ALWAYS + progressive constructions. York Papers in Linguistics (Series 2) 8: 120–137.Google Scholar
2010a The Progressive in Modern English. A Corpus-Based Study of Grammaticalization and Related Changes. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
2010b Grammaticalization, subjectification and objectification. In Grammaticalization: Current Views and Issues [Studies in Language Companion Series 119], Ekaterini Stathi, Elke Gehweiler & Ekkehard König (eds), 101–121. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 Functional layering and the English progressive. Linguistics 51(1): 1–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laitinen, Mikko
2011 Contacts and variability in international Englishes: Compiling and using the Corpus of English in Finland. In Methodological and Historical Dimensions of Corpus Linguistics [Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 6] Paul Rayson, Sebastian Hoffmann & Geoffrey Leech (eds). http://​www​.helsinki​.fi​/varieng​/journal​/volumes​/06 (27 February 2014).Google Scholar
2014 Ongoing changes in English modals: On the developments in advanced L2 use of English. Paper presented at the 3 ISLE Conference . University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Forthcoming a. Ongoing changes in English modals: On the developments in ELF. In Olga Timofeeva, Sarah Chevalier, Anne-Christine Gardner & Alpo Honkapohja (eds.) New Approaches in English Linguistics: Building Bridges Studies in Language Companion Series Amsterdam John Benjamins
Forthcoming b. Ongoing changes and advanced L2 use of English: Evidence from new corpus resources. In María José López-Couso, Belén Méndez-Naya, Paloma Núñez-Pertejo & Ignacio M. Palacios-Martínez (eds.) Corpus Linguistics on the Move: Exploring and Understanding English through Corpora Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics Amsterdam & New York Brill/Rodopi
Leech, Geoffrey
1987[1971] Meaning and the English Verb, 2nd edn. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2013 Where have all the modals gone? An essay on the declining frequency of core modal auxiliaries in recent standard English. In English Modality: Core, Periphery and Evidentiality, Juana. I. Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús Hita, & Johan van der Auwera (eds), 95–115. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian
& Smith, Nicholas 2009 Change in Contemporary English. A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leppänen, Sirpa, Pitkänen-Huhta, Anne, Nikula, Tarja, Kytölä, Samu, Törmäkangas, Timo, Nissinen, Kari, Kääntä, Leila, Räisänen, Tiina, Laitinen, Mikko, Koskela, Heidi, Lähdesmäki, Salla & Jousmäki, Henna
2011 National Survey on the English Language in Finland: Uses, Meanings and Attitudes. http://​www​.helsinki​.fi​/varieng​/journal​/volumes​/05 (27 February 2014).Google Scholar
Levin, Magnus
2013 The progressive verb in modern American English. In The Verb Phrase in English: Investigating Recent Language Change with Corpora, Bas Aarts, Joanne Close, Geoffrey Leech & Sean Wallis (eds), 187–216. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming. He’s always telling some kind of lie: Subjective progressives in the history of American English. Paper presented at the 35 ICAME Conference , Nottingham, UK.
Ljung, Magnus
1980 Reflections on the English Progressive. Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
Mair, Christian
2013 The World System of Englishes. Accounting for the transnational importance of mobile and mediated vernaculars. English World-Wide 34(3): 253–278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mauranen, Anna
2012 Exploring ELF: Academic English Shaped by Non-Native Speakers. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Millar, Neil
2009 Modal verbs in TIME. Frequency changes 1923–2006. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14(2): 191–220. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato & Hundt, Marianne
(eds) 2011 Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 44]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
① ② ③
Nesselhauf, Nadja
2007 The spread of the progressive and its ‘future’ use. English Language and Linguistics 11(1): 191–207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Noël, Dirk, van Rooy, Bertus & van der Auwera, Johan
2014 Diachronic Approaches to Modality in World Englishes: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of English Linguistics 42(1): 3–6. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Núñez-Pertejo, Paloma
2004 The Progressive in the History of English: with Special Reference to the Early Modern English Period: A Corpus-based Study. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ranta, Elina
2006 The ‘attractive’ progressive – why use the -ing form in English as a Lingua Franca? Nordic Journal of English Studies 5(2): 95–116.Google Scholar
Rautionaho, Paula
2014 Variation in the Progressive: A Corpus-based Study into World Englishes. Tampere: University of Tampere. http://​urn​.fi​/URN:ISBN:978​-951​-44​-9636​-3 (15 March 2015).Google Scholar
Rissanen, Matti
2008 Corpus linguistics and historical linguistics. In Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook, Anke Lüdeling & Merja Kytö (eds), 53–68. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Römer, Ute
2005 Progressives, Patterns, Pedagogy: A Corpus-Driven Approach to English Progressive Forms, Functions, Contexts and Didactics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 18]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sand, Andrea
2013 Singapore weblogs: Between speech and writing. In Corpus Linguistics and Variation in English: Focus on Non-Native Englishes [Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 13], Magnus Huber & Joybrato Mukherjee (eds). http://​www​.helsinki​.fi​/varieng​/series​/volumes​/13/ (27 February 2014).Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W.
2014 New reflections on the evolutionary dynamics of world Englishes. World Englishes 33(1): 9–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seidlhofer, Barbara
2011 Understanding English as a Lingua Franca. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Smitterberg, Erik
2005 The Progressive in Nineteenth-Century English. A Process of Integration. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt & Kortmann, Bernd
2011 Typological profiling: Learner Englishes versus indigenized L2 varieties of English. In Mukherjee & Hundt (eds), Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap, 167–187. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Karen
2005 The Longman Spoken American Corpus: providing an in-depth analysis of everyday English. www​.pearsonlongman​.com​/dictionaries​/pdfs​/spoken​-american​.pdf (23 September 2014).
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Dasher, Richard
2002 Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Visser, F. Theodorus
1963 An Historical Syntax of the English Language. Part I. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Westergren Axelsson, Margareta & Hahn, Angela
2001 The use of the progressive in Swedish and German advanced learner English – a corpus-based study. ICAME Journal 25: 5–30.Google Scholar
Wright, Susan
1994 The mystery of the modal progressive. In Studies in Early Modern English, Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), 467–485. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar