Modeling World Englishes from a cross-linguistic perspective
The increasing diversification of English qua World Englishes contributes to cross-linguistic variation. Still, we tend to consider and model varieties of English from a language-internal perspective. Taking Mair’s (2013) World System of Englishes as a starting point, I here explore how to model World Englishes from a cross-linguistic typological perspective, commenting on the tension between normative pressure and cross-linguistic tendencies and generalizations. Variation studies and language typology investigate micro and macro variation, respectively, though the empirical domains in focus and the methodologies employed show considerable overlap. Moreover, the traditional distinction between language and variety becomes increasingly difficult to draw in today’s multilingual and highly interconnected world. I examine the commonalities and differences of the two approaches to language variation that have largely been working independently of one another focusing on language universals and the ways that grammatical phenomena from World Englishes match up against them. Varieties of English attest a good deal of typological variation, though they also offer curious features rarely found in other languages.
Article outline
- 1.World Englishes and cross-linguistic diversity
- 2.Variation studies and language typology
- 3.Typological universals and World Englishes
- 4.Vernacular universals and angloversals
- 5.Explanations and motivations
- 5.1Historical migration
- 5.2Globalization and social media use
- 5.3Language contact and second language acquisition
- 5.4Grammaticalization
- 6.Summary and conclusion
-
Acknowledgement
-
Notes
-
References
References (86)
References
Alsagoff, L. & Lick, Ho Chee. 1998. The relative clause in colloquial Singapore English. World Englishes 17(2): 127–138.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anderwald, L. 2002. Negation in Non-Standard British English: Gaps, Regularizations and Asymmetries. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bao, Z. 2005. The aspectual system of Singapore English and the systemic substratist explanation. Journal of Linguistics 41(2): 237–267.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burridge, K. & Kortmann, K. (eds). 2009. Varieties of English, Vol. 3: The Pacific and Australasia. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chambers, J. K. 2004. Dynamic typology and vernacular universals. In Dialectology Meets Typology. Dialect Grammar from a Cross-Linguistic Perspective, B. Kortmann (ed.), 127–145. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Christian, D. 1991. The personal dative in Appalachian speech. In Dialects of English: Studies in Grammatical Variation, P. Trudgill & J. K. Chambers (eds), 11–17. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clarke, S. 2004. Newfoundland English: Morphology and syntax. In Kortmann, Burridge, Mesthrie, Schneider, & Upton (eds), 303–318. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Comrie, B. & Kuteva T. 2013. Relativization on subjects. In Dryer & Haspelmath (eds), Chapter 122. <[URL]>
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Corbett, G. 2000. Number. Cambridge: CUP.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Corbett, G. 2006. Agreement. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, W. 2004. Typology and Universals. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Davydova, J., Hilbert, M., Pietsch L. & Siemund, P. 2011. Comparing varieties of English: Problems and perspectives. In Linguistic Universals and Language Variation, P. Siemund (ed.), 291–323. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Deutscher Sprachatlas. 1927–1956. Based on Georg Wenker’s Sprachatlas des deutschen Reichs, started by Ferdinand Wrede and continued by Walther Mitzka and Bernhard Martin. Marburg: Elwert.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dryer M. & Haspelmath, M. (eds). 2013. The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. <[URL]>
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Edwards, V. 1993. The grammar of southern British English. In Real English: The Grammar of English Dialects in the British Isles, J. Milroy & L. Milroy (eds), 214–242. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Evans, N. & Levinson, S. 2009. The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32(5): 429–492.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Faltz, L. M. 1985. Reflexivization: A Study in Universal Syntax. New York NY: Garland.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Faraclas, N. 1996. Nigerian Pidgin. London: Routledge.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Filppula, M. 1999. A Grammar of Irish English: Language in Hibernian Style. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Filppula, M. 2004. Irish English: Morphology and syntax. In Kortmann, Burridge, Mesthrie, Schneider & Upton (eds), 73–101.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Filppula, M., Klemola, J. & Paulasto, H. (eds). 2009. Vernacular Universals and Language Contacts: Evidence from Varieties of English and Beyond. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gilliéron, J. & Edmont, E. 1902–1914. Atlas linguistique de la France, 10 Vols. Paris: Ed. du Cths.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Godfrey, E. & Tagliamonte, S. 1999. Another piece of the verbal -s story: Evidence from Devon in Southwest England. Language Variation and Change 11(1): 87–121.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, M. 2013. Negative indefinite pronouns and predicate negation. In Dryer & Haspelmath (eds), Chapter 115. <[URL]>
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heine, B. & Kuteva, T. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heller, B., Bernaisch, T. & Gries, S. T. 2017a. Empirical perspectives on two potential epicenters: The genitive alternation in Asian Englishes. ICAME Journal 41(1): 33–66.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heller, B., Szmrecsanyi, B. & Grafmiller, J. 2017b. Stability and fluidity in syntactic variation World-Wide: The genitive alternation across varieties of English. Journal of English Linguistics 45(1): 3–27.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Herrmann, T. 2003. Relative Clauses in Dialects of English: A Typological Approach. PhD dissertation, University of Freiburg.
Hopp, H., Kieseier, T., Vogelbacher, M. & Thoma, D. 2018. L1 effects in the early L3 acquisition of vocabulary and grammar. In Foreign Language Education in Multilingual Classrooms [Hamburg Studies on Linguistic Diversity 7], A. Bonnet & P. Siemund (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
von Humboldt, W. 1836. Über die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaus und ihren Einfluss auf die geistige Entwicklung des Menschengeschlechts. Berlin: Königliche Akademie der Wissenschaften.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kachru, B. 1985. Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In English in the World. Teaching and Learning the Language and Literatures, R. Quirk & H. Widdowson (eds), 11–30. Cambridge: CUP and the British Council.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Keenan, E. & Comrie, B. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 63–99.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kemmer, S. 1993. The Middle Voice [Typological Studies in Language 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kortmann, B. 2004. Synopsis: Morphological and syntactic variation in the British Isles. In Kortmann, Burridge, Mesthrie, Schneider, & Upton (eds), 1089–1103. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kortmann, B., Burridge, K., Mesthrie, R., Schneider, E., Upton, C. (eds). 2004. A Handbook of Varieties of English, Vol. 2: Morphology and Syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kortmann, B. & Lunkenheimer, K. (eds). 2013. The Electronic World Atlas of Varieties of English. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]>
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leimgruber, J., Siemund, P. & Terassa, L. 2018. Singaporean students’ language repertoires and attitudes revisited. World Englishes.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lorenz, E. 2018. “One day a father and his son going fishing on the Lake.” – A study on the use of the progressive aspect of monolingual and bilingual learners of English. In Foreign Language Education in Multilingual Classrooms [Hamburg Studies on Linguistic Diversity 7], A. Bonnet & P. Siemund (eds), Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Malcolm, I. G. 2008. Australian Creoles and Aboriginal English: Morphology and syntax. In Burridge & Kortmann (eds), 415–443.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mathiot, M. (assisted by M. Roberts). 1979. Sex roles as revealed through referential gender in American English. In Ethnolinguistics: Boas, Sapir and Whorf Revisited, M. Mathiot (ed.), 1–47. The Hague: Mouton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McCormick, K. 2004. Cape Flats English: Morphology and syntax. In Kortmann, Burridge, Mesthrie, Schneider, & Upton (eds), 993–1005. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McCormick, K. 2008. Cape Flats English: Morphology and Syntax. In Varieties of English, Vol. 4: Africa, South and Southeast Asia, R. Mesthrie (ed.), 521–534. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Melchers, G. 2004. English spoken in Orkney and Shetland: Morphology, syntax and lexicon. In Kortmann, Burridge, Mesthrie, Schneider, & Upton (eds), 34–46. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mesthrie, R. & Dunne, T. T. 1990. Syntactic variation in language shift: The relative clause in South African Indian English. Language Variation and Change 2(1): 31–56.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Miestamo, M. 2000. Towards a typology of standard negation. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 23(1): 65–88.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Miestamo, M. 2007. Negation – an overview of typological research. Language and Linguistics Compass 1(5): 552–570.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Miller, J. 2004. Scottish English: Morphology and syntax. In Kortmann, Burridge, Mesthrie, Schneider, & Upton (eds), 47–72. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Montgomery, M. 2004. Appalachian English: Morphology and syntax. In Kortmann, Burridge, Mesthrie, Schneider, & Upton (eds), 245–280. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mufwene, S. 2001. The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge: CUP.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mufwene, S. 2008. Gullah: Morphology and syntax. In Varieties of English, Vol. 2: The Americas and the Caribbean, E. W. Schneider (ed.), 551–571. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Onysko, A. 2016. Modeling world Englishes from the perspective of language contact. World Englishes 35(2): 196–220.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Orton, H. & Dieth, E. (eds). 1962–1971. Survey of English Dialects, 13 Vols. Leeds: E.J. Arnold & Son.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pawley, A. 2004. Australian vernacular English: Some grammatical characteristics. In Kortmann, Burridge, Mesthrie, Schneider, & Upton (eds), 611–642. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Peters, P. 2009. Australian English as a regional epicenter. In World Englishes – Problems, Properties and Prospects [Varieties of English Around the World G40], T. Hoffmann & L. Siebers (eds), 107–124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pietsch, L. 2005. Variable Grammars: Verbal Agreement in Northern Dialects of English. Tübingen: Niemeyer.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Poplack, S. & Tagliamonte, S. 2001. African American English in the Diaspora. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sasse, H-J. 1993. Syntactic categories and subcategories. In Syntax. Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung / An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft / Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication 9], J. Jacobs, A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld, & T. Vennemann (eds), 646–686. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
von Schlegel, A. W. 1818. Observations sur la langue et la littérature provençales. Paris: Librairie grecque-latine-allemande.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schneider, E. W. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: CUP.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Siemund, P. 2004. English. In Variationstypologie, T. Roelcke (ed.), 1–29. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Siemund, P. 2008. Pronominal Gender in English: A Study of English Varieties from a Cross-Linguistic Perspective. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Siemund, P. 2009. Linguistic universals and vernacular data. In Vernacular Universals and Language Contacts: Evidence from Varieties of English and Beyond, M. Filppula, J. Klemola, & H. Paulasto (eds), 321–346. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Siemund, P. 2010. Grammaticalization, lexicalization and intensification. English itself as a marker of middle situation types. Linguistics 48(4): 797–836.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Siemund, P. 2013. Varieties of English. A Typological Approach. Cambridge: CUP.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Siemund, P. 2014. The emergence of English reflexive verbs: An analysis based on the Oxford English Dictionary. English Language and Linguistics 18(1): 49–73.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Siemund, P., Schulz, M. E. & Schweinberger, M. 2014. Studying the linguistic ecology of Singapore: A comparison of college and university students. World Englishes 33(3): 340–362.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Siemund, P., Schröter, S. & Rahbari, S. 2018. Learning English demonstrative pronouns on bilingual substrate: Evidence from German heritage speakers of Russian, Turkish, and Vietnamese. In Foreign Language Education in Multilingual Classrooms [Hamburg Studies on Linguistic Diversity 7], A. Bonnet & P. Siemund (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Silverstein, M. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages [Linguistic Series 22], R. M. W. Dixon (ed.), 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Smith, G. 2008. Tok Pisin: Morphology and Syntax. In Burridge & Kortmann (eds), 488–513.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stassen, L. 2013. Zero copula for predicate nominals. In Dryer & Haspelmath (eds), Chapter 120. <[URL]>
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Strevens, P. 1980. Teaching English as an International Language. Oxford: Pergamon Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Swaan, A. 2001. The World Language System. A Political Sociology and Political Economy of Language. Cambridge: Polity.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Szmrecsanyi, B. & Kortmann, B. 2009. Vernacular universals and angloversals in a typological perspective. In Vernacular Universals and Language Contacts: Evidence from Varieties of English and Beyond, M. Filppula, J. Klemola, & H. Paulasto (eds), 33–53. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tagliamonte, S., Jennifer S. & Lawrence, H. 2005. No taming the vernacular! Insights from the relatives in northern Britain. Language Variation and Change 17(1): 75–112.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Trudgill, P. 1999. The Dialects of England. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Trudgill, P. 2011. Sociolinguistic Typology. Social Determinants of Linguistic Complexity. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vertovec, S. 2007. Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies 30: 1024–54.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wagner, S. 2004. English dialects in the Southwest: Morphology and syntax. In Kortmann, Burridge, Mesthrie, Schneider, & Upton (eds), 154–174. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wright, J. 1898–1905. The English Dialect Dictionary, 6 Vols. Oxford: Henry Frowde.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zupitza, J. (ed.). 1966. Aelfrics Grammatik und Glossar. Berlin: Weidmannsche Verlagsbuchhandlung.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Friedrich, Patricia
2020.
When Englishes go digital.
World Englishes 39:1
► pp. 67 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.