References

References

Behaghel, O.
1909Beziehungen zwischen Umfang und Reihenfolge von Satzgliedern. Indogermanische Forschungen 25(1): 110–142.Google Scholar
Bernaisch, T.
2015The Lexis and Lexicogrammar of Sri Lankan English [Varieties of English Around the World G54]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bernaisch, T., Gries, S. Th. & Mukherjee, J.
2014The dative alternation in South Asian Englishes: Modelling predictors and predicting prototypes. English World-Wide 35(1): 7–21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biewer, C.
2015South Pacific Englishes: A Sociolinguistic and Morphosyntactic Profile of Fiji English, Samoan English and Cook Islands English [Varieties of English Around the World G52]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collins, P.
2012Singular agreement in there-existentials: An intervarietal corpus-based study. English World-Wide 33(1): 53–68.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 2015Grammatical Change in English World-Wide [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 67]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deshors, S.
2017Structuring subjectivity in Asian Englishes: Multivariate approaches to mental predicates across genres and functional uses. English Text Construction 10(1): 132–163.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deshors, S. & Gries, S. Th.
2016Profiling verb complementation constructions across New Englishes: A two-step random forests analysis to ing vs. to complements. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 21(2): 192–218.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A.
2016English in the Netherlands: Functions, Forms and Attitudes [Varieties of English Around the World G56]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fong, V.
2004The verbal cluster. In Singapore English: A Grammatical Description [Varieties of English Around the World G33], L. Lim (ed.), 75–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grafmiller, J.
2014Variation in English genitives across modality and genres. English Language and Linguistics 18(3): 471–496.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greenbaum, S.
1991ICE: The International Corpus of English. English Today 7: 3–7.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1996Comparing English Worldwide: The International Corpus of English. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Gries, S. Th. & Adelman, A.
2014Subject realization in Japanese conversation by native and non-native speakers: Exemplifying a new paradigm for learner corpus research. In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2014: New Empirical and Theoretical Paradigms, J. Romero-Trillo (ed.), 35–54. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Gries, S. Th. & Bernaisch, T.
2016Exploring epicenters empirically: Focus on South Asian Englishes. English World-Wide 37(1): 1–25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. Th. & Deshors, S.
2014Using regressions to explore deviations between corpus data and a standard/target: Two suggestions. Corpora 9(1): 109–136.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. Th. & Deshors, S.
2015EFL and/vs. ESL? A multi-level regression modeling perspective on bridging the paradigm gap. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 1(1): 130–159.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hall, R.. Jr
1962The life cycle of pidgin languages. Lingua 11(1): 151–156.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heller, B., Bernaisch, T. & Gries, S. Th.
2017Empirical perspectives on two potential epicenters: The genitive alternation in Asian Englishes. ICAME Journal 41: 111–144.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heller, B., Szmrecsanyi, B. & Grafmiller, J.
2017Stability and fluidity in syntactic variation world-wide: The genitive alternation across varieties of English. Journal of English Linguistics 45 (1): 3–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hinrichs, L. & Szmrecsanyi, B.
2007Recent changes in the function and frequency of Standard English genitive constructions: A multivariate analysis of tagged corpora. English Language and Linguistics 11(3): 437–474.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, S.
2013The Corpus of Historical Singapore English – Practical and methodological issues. UCREL Corpus Research Seminar. http://​ucrel​.lancs​.ac​.uk​/crs​/attachments​/UCRELCRS​-2013​-03​-26​-Hoffmann​-Slides​.pdf (26 June 2017).
Hoffmann, S., Hundt, M. & Mukherjee, J.
2011Indian English – An emerging epicentre? A pilot study on light verbs in web-derived corpora of South Asian Englishes. Anglia 129(3–4): 258–280.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, S., Sand, A. & Tan, P.
2012The Corpus of Historical Singapore English – A first pilot study on data from the 1950s and 1960s. Paper presented at ICAME 33 , University of Leuven, Belgium.
Huber, M.
2012Syntactic and variational complexity in British and Ghanaian English. Relative clause formation in the written parts of the International Corpus of English. In Linguistic Complexity. Second Language Acquisition, Indigenization, Contact, B. Kortmann & B. Szmrecsanyi (eds), 218–242. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kachru, B.
1985Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In English in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and Literatures, R. Quirk & H. G. Widdowson (eds), 11–20. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Mair, C.
1995Changing patterns of complementation and concomitant grammaticalisation of the verb Help in present-day British English. In The Verb in Contemporary English, B. Aarts & C. Meyer (eds), 258–272. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2002Three changing patterns of verb complementation in Late Modern English: A real-time study based on matching text corpora. English Language and Linguistics 6(1): 105–131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013The World System of Englishes: Accounting for the transnational importance of mobile and mediated vernaculars. English World-Wide 34(3): 253–278.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McArthur, T.
1987The English languages? English Today 3(3): 9–13.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moag, R.
1982The life cycle of non-native Englishes: A case study. In The Other Tongue, B. B. Kachru (ed.), 270–288. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
1992The life cycle of non-native Englishes: A case study. In The Other Tongue, 2nd edn, B. B. Kachru (ed.), 233–252. Urbana IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, J.
2008Sri Lankan English: Evolutionary status and epicentral influence from Indian English. In Anglistentag 2007 Münster: Proceedings , K. Stierstorfer (ed.), 359–368. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, J. & Gries, S. Th.
2009Collostructional nativisation in New Englishes: Verb-construction associations in the International Corpus of English. English World-Wide 30(1): 27–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Noël, D., van Rooy, B. & van der Auwera, J.
(eds) 2014Diachronic approaches to modality in World Englishes. Journal of English Linguistics 42: 3–88.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Osselton, N.
1988Thematic genitives. In An Historic Tongue: Studies in English Linguistics in Memory of Barbara Strang, G. Nixon & J. Honey (eds),138–144. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rosenbach, A.
2005Animacy versus weight as determinants of grammatical variation in English. Language 81(3): 613–644.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014English genitive variation – The state of the art. English Language and Linguistics 18(2): 215–262.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, E. W.
2003The dynamics of New Englishes: From identity construction to dialect birth. Language 79(2): 233–281.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004How to trace structural nativization: Particle verbs in world Englishes. World Englishes 23(2): 227–249.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, E. W.
2007Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014New reflections on the evolutionary dynamics of World Englishes. World Englishes 33(1): 9–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Strevens, P.
1980Teaching English as an International Language: From Practice to Principle. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, B.
2006Morphosyntactic Persistence in Spoken English. A Corpus Study at the Intersection of Variationist Sociolinguistics, Psycholinguistics, and Discourse Analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, B., Grafmiller, J., Heller, B. & Röthlisberger, M.
2016Around the world in three alternations: Modeling syntactic variation in varieties of English. English World-Wide 37(2): 109–137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wulff, S. & Gries, S. Th.
2015Prenominal adjective order preferences in Chinese and German L2 English: A multifactorial corpus study. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 5(1): 122–150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wulff, S., Gries, S. Th. & Lester, N.
Forthcoming. Optional that in complementation by German and Spanish learners: Where and how German and Spanish learners differ from native speakers. In What does Applied Cognitive Linguistics Look Like? Answers from the L2 Classroom and SLA Studies, A. Tyler & C. Moder (eds) Berlin De Gruyter Mouton
Zwicky, A.
1987Suppressing the Zs. Journal of Linguistics 23(1): 133–148.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 8 other publications

No author info given
2021.  In Corpora, Constructions, New Englishes [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 100], Crossref logo
Botha, Werner & Tobias Bernaisch
2020.  In The Handbook of Asian Englishes,  pp. 169 ff. Crossref logo
Collins, Peter Craig
2020. Comment markers in world Englishes. World Englishes Crossref logo
Gonzales, Wilkinson Daniel Wong, Mie Hiramoto, Jakob R. E. Leimgruber & Jun Jie Lim
2021. The Corpus of Singapore English Messages (CoSEM). World Englishes Crossref logo
Hundt, Marianne
2019.  In The Cambridge Handbook of World Englishes,  pp. 506 ff. Crossref logo
Hundt, Marianne
2021. On models and modelling. World Englishes 40:3  pp. 298 ff. Crossref logo
Kruger, Haidee & Gert De Sutter
2018. Alternations in contact and non-contact varieties. Translation, Cognition & Behavior 1:2  pp. 251 ff. Crossref logo
Mukherjee, Joybrato & Tobias Bernaisch
2020.  In The Handbook of Asian Englishes,  pp. 741 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.