Chapter 9
A variational pragmatic approach to responses to thanks in
Namibian English
From quantitative to qualitative analysis
Variational pragmatics has only recently been
combined with non-native World Englishes research, by examining the
pragmatics of Namibian English (NamE). However, this research has
concentrated on the comparison of pragmatic phenomena in NamE to
those in some L1-varieties, exclusively based on the same mixed-task
questionnaire. Although this has led to the discovery of
specifically Namibian usages, limitations to the validity of this
type of data collection have been pointed out. This chapter
triangulates the results of a quantitative questionnaire study with
qualitative analysis of role-plays and meta-pragmatic focus group
discussions, reassessing earlier findings on responses to thanks in
NamE. This contributes to the understanding of sociolinguistic
complexity and the negotiation of pragmatic strategies in the
multilingual ecology of Namibia.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Responses to thanks: An overview
- 3.Responses to thanks in NamE from a quantitative
perspective
- 4.Responses to thanks in NamE from a qualitative
perspective
- 4.1Data collection
- 4.2Data analysis
- 4.3Discussion
- 5.Conclusions and outlook
-
Notes
-
References
References
Aijmer, Karin
1996 Conversational
Routines in English: Convention and
Creativity. London: Longman.
Anchimbe, Eric A. & Janney, Richard W.
2017 Postcolonial
pragmatics. In
The
Routledge Handbook of
Pragmatics,
Anne Barron,
Yueguo Gu &
Gerard Steen (eds), 105–120. London: Routledge.
Barron, Anne
2017 Variational
pragmatics. In
The
Routledge Handbook of
Pragmatics,
Anne Barron,
Yueguo Gu &
Gerard Steen (eds), 91–104. London: Routledge.
Barron, Anne & Schneider, Klaus P.
(eds) 2005 The
Pragmatics of Irish
English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bieswanger, Markus
2015 Variational
pragmatics and responding to thanks –
Revisited.
Multilingua 34(4): 527–546.
Buschfeld, Sarah & Kautzsch, Alexander
2017 Towards
an integrated approach to postcolonial and non-postcolonial
Englishes.
World
Englishes 36(1): 104–126.
Coulmas, Florian
1978 Routineformeln
und pragmatische
Interferenzen. In
Kongreßberichte
der 8. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Angewandte
Linguistik GAL e.V. Mainz
1977, Band II,
Wolfgang Kühlwein &
Albert Raasch (eds), 31–39. Stuttgart: Hochschulverlag.
Culpeper, Jonathan & Haugh, Michael
2014 Pragmatics
and the English
Language. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dinkin, Aaron J.
2018 It’s
no problem to be polite: Apparent-time change in responses
to thanks.
Journal of
Sociolinguistics 22(2): 190–215.
Félix-Brasdefer, J. César
2008 Perceptions
of refusals to invitation: Exploring the minds of foreign
language learners.
Language
Awareness 17(3): 195–211.
Félix-Brasdefer, J. César & Hasler-Barker, Maria
2017 Elicited
data. In
The
Routledge Handbook of
Pragmatics,
Anne Barron,
Yueguo Gu &
Gerard Steen (eds), 27–40. London: Routledge.
Goffman, Erving
1971 Relations
in Public: Microstudies of Public
Order. New York NY: Harper & Row.
Kachru, Braj B.
1985 Standards,
codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English
language in the outer
circle. In
English
in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and
Literatures,
Randolph Quirk &
Henry G. Widdowson (eds), 11–30. Cambridge: CUP.
Kautzsch, Alexander & Schröder, Anne
2016 English
in multilingual and multiethnic Namibia: Some evidence on
language attitudes and the pronunciation of
vowels. In
Anglistentag
2015 Paderborn: Proceedings,
Christoph Ehland,
Ilka Mindt &
Merle Tönnies (eds), 277–288. Trier: WVT.
Kern, Friederike, Schröder, Anne & Schneider, Klaus P.
2018 Variational
pragmatics meets contrastive pragmatics: English and German
responses to thanks in
Namibia. Paper presented at
the 4th International Conference
of the American Pragmatics Association
(AMPRA), 1 –3 November
2018, Albany
NY.
Kortmann, Bernd & Schneider, Edgar W.
(eds) 2008 Varieties
of
English, 4 Vols. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Melchers, Gunnel & Shaw, Philip
2011 World
Englishes, 2nd
edn. Abingdon: Hodder.
Mesthrie, Rajend & Bhatt, Rakesh M.
2008 World
Englishes: The Study of New Linguistic
Varieties. Cambridge: CUP.
Mulo Farenkia, Bernard
2012 Face-saving
strategies in responding to gratitude expressions: Evidence
from Canadian
English.
International
Journal of English
Linguistics 2(4): 1–11.
Mulo Farenkia, Bernard
2018 Thanks
response strategies in Cameroon
French.
International Journal
of
Linguistics 10(5): 61–83.
Ogiermann, Eva
2018 Discourse
completion
tasks. In
Methods
in Pragmatics,
Andreas H. Jucker,
Klaus P. Schneider &
Wolfram Bublitz (eds), 229–256. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Preston, Dennis R. & Niedzielski, Nancy
2017 Folk
pragmatics. In
The
Routledge Handbook of
Pragmatics,
Anne Barron,
Yueguo Gu &
Gerard Steen (eds), 197–211. London: Routledge.
Rüegg, Larssyn
2014 Thanks
responses in three socio-economic settings: A variational
pragmatics approach.
Journal
of
Pragmatics 71: 17–30.
Schlieben-Lange, Brigitte & Weydt, Harald
1978 Für
eine Pragmatisierung der
Dialektologie.
Zeitschrift
für Germanistische
Linguistik 6(3): 257–282.
Schneider, Klaus P.
2005 ‘No
problem’, ‘you’re welcome’, ‘anytime’: Responding to thanks
in Ireland, England, and the
USA. In
The
Pragmatics of Irish English,
Anne Barron &
Klaus P. Schneider (eds), 101–139. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Schneider, Klaus P.
2007 Genre
matters: Textual and contextual constraints on contemporary
English speech
behaviour.
Anglia 125(1): 59–83.
Schneider, Klaus P.
2008 Small
talk in England, Ireland, and the
USA. In
Variational
Pragmatics: A Focus on Regional Varieties in Pluricentric
Languages [
Pragmatics & Beyond
New Series 178],
Klaus P. Schneider &
Anne Barron (eds), 99–139. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Schneider, Klaus P.
2010 Variational
pragmatics. In
Variation
and Change: Pragmatic
Perspectives,
Mirjam Fried,
Jan-Ola Östman &
Jef Verschueren (eds), 239–267. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Schneider, Klaus P.
2012a Appropriate
behaviour across varieties of
English.
Journal of
Pragmatics 44(9): 1022–1037.
Schneider, Klaus P.
2012b Pragmatics. In
Areal
Features of the Anglophone
World,
Raymond Hickey (ed.), 463–486. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Schneider, Klaus P.
2017 Pragmatic
competence and pragmatic
variation. In
Doing
Pragmatics Interculturally: Cognitive, Philosophical, and
Sociopragmatic Perspectives,
Rachel Giora &
Michael Haugh (eds), 315–333. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Schneider, Klaus P. & Barron, Anne
Schneider, Klaus P. & Placencia, Maria Elena
2017 (Im)politeness
and regional
variation. In
The
Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic
(Im)politeness,
Jonathan Culpeper,
Michael Haugh, &
Dániel Kádár (eds), 539–570. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Schneider, Klaus P. & Schröder, Anne
2016 The
pragmatics of Namibian English: A focus on
requests. Paper presented at
the 3rd International Conference
of the American Pragmatics Association
(AMPRA), 4.
–6.11.2016, Bloomington,
IN.
Schneider, Klaus P. & Schröder, Anne
Forthcoming.
Small
talk in Namibia: Creating common ground in
English. In
Communicative
Action and Interaction in
Africa,
Susanne Mohr,
Klaus P. Schneider, &
Jemima A. Anderson (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Schröder, Anne & Schneider, Klaus P.
Schröder, Anne & Zähres, Frederic
2020 English
in Namibia: Multilingualism and ethnic variation in the
Extra- and Intra-Territorial Forces
model. In
Modelling
World Englishes: A Joint Approach to Postcolonial and
Non-Postcolonial Varieties,
Sarah Buschfeld &
Alexander Kautzsch (eds), 38–62. Edinburgh: EUP.
Talla Sando Ouafeu, Yves
2009 Thanking
responders in Cameroon
English.
World
Englishes 28(4): 544–551.
Wunderlich, Dieter
1980 Methodological
remarks on speech act
theory. In
Speech
Act Theory and Pragmatics,
John R. Searle,
Ferenc Kiefer, &
Manfred Bierwisch (eds), 291–312. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Barron, Anne
2022.
Responses to Thanks in Ireland, England and Canada: A Variational Pragmatic Perspective.
Corpus Pragmatics 6:2
► pp. 127 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.