Cover not available
Part of
Earlier North American Englishes
Edited by Merja Kytö and Lucia Siebers
[Varieties of English Around the World G66] 2022
► pp. 1–18

Earlier North American Englishes

Recent advances and future prospects

 | Uppsala University
 | University of Duisburg-Essen
Article outline
  • 1.Introductory remarks
  • 2.Anglo-American Englishes
  • 3.Focus on varieties
  • 4.The corpus linguistic turn and novel analytical frameworks
  • 5.Canadian English
  • 6.Concluding remarks
  • References
Published online: 15 July 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g66.01kyt
References (84)
References
Agha, A. 2003. The social life of cultural value. Language & Communication 23: 231–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. Language and Social Relations [Studies in the Social Life and Cultural Foundations of Language 24]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, H. 1928. The language of the Salem witchcraft trials. American Speech 3: 390–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Algeo, J. (ed.). 2001. The Cambridge History of the English Language. Volume VI: English in North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderwald, L. 2012. Variable past-tense forms in nineteenth-century American English: Linking normative grammars and language change. American Speech 87: 257–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013. Natural language change or prescriptive influence? Throve, dove, pled, drug and snuck in 19th-century American English. English World-Wide 34: 146–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Avis, W. S. 1967. Introduction. In Dictionary of Canadianisms on Historical Principles, Avis et al. (eds), xii–xv. See [URL] (23 January 2022).
Bailey, G., Maynor, N. & Cukor-Avila, P. (eds). 1991. The Emergence of Black English. Text and Commentary. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beal, J. 2009. Enregisterment, commodification and historical context: “Geordie” versus “Sheffieldish”. American Speech 84: 138–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chalkey, L. 1912. Chronicles of the Scotch-Irish Settlement in Virginia: Extracted from the Original Court Records of Augusta County, 1745–1800. Rosslyn, VA: The Commonwealth Printing Company.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. 1994. An introduction to dialect topography. English World-Wide 15: 35–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004. “Canadian dainty”: The rise and decline of Briticisms in Canada. In Legacies of Colonial English. Studies in Transported Dialects, R. Hickey (ed.), 224–241. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, M. 2012a. Expanding horizons in historical linguistics with the 400 million word Corpus of Historical American English. Corpora 7(2): 121–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012b. The 400 million word corpus of Historical American English (1810–2009). In English Historical Linguistics 2010, I. Hegedüs & A. Fodor (eds)217–250. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Devitt, A. 1989. Genre as textual variable: Some historical evidence from Scots and American English. American Speech 64: 291–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dollinger, S. 2006. Oh Canada! Towards the Corpus of Early Ontario English. In The Changing Face of Corpus Linguistics [Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics 55], A. Renouf & A. Kehoe (eds), 7–25. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
2012. Varieties of English: Canadian English in real-time perspective. In English Historical Linguistics: An International Handbook, L. Brinton & A. Bergs (eds), 1858–1879. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
2015. Emerging standards in the colonies: Variation and the Canadian letter writer. In Letter Writing and Language Change, A. Auer, D. Schreier & R. J. Watts (eds), 101–113. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.-in-chief). 2017. DCHP-2: The Dictionary of Canadianisms on Historical Principles Online. With the assistance of Margery Fee and Laurel Brinton. Second Edition. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia. [URL]. (23 January 2022).
(ed.-in-chief), Brinton, L. J. & Fee, M. (eds). 2013. DCHP-1 Online: A Dictionary of Canadianisms on Historical Principles Online. Based on W. S. Avis et al. (1967). (Online dictionary). Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia. [URL].
Eliason, N. 1956. Tarheel Talk. An Historical Study of the English Language in North Carolina to 1860. Chapel Hill: North Carolina University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, M. 2016. Mapping southern American English 1861–1865. Journal of Linguistic Geography 4: 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, M. & Montgomery, M. 2011. About ALL: Studies in nineteenth-century American English. American Speech 86(3): 340–354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012. LAMSAS, CACWL, and the South-South Midland dialect boundary in nineteenth-century North Carolina. American Speech 87(4): 470–490. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fitzmaurice, S. M. & Taavitsainen, I. (eds). 2007. Methods in Historical Pragmatics [Topics in English Linguistics 52]. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Galinsky, H. 1979. Das Amerikanische Englisch: Seine innere Entwicklung und internationale Ausstrahlung [Erträge der Forschung 125]. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Grund, P. 2007. From tongue to text: The transmission of the Salem witchcraft examination records. American Speech 82 (2): 119–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grund, P., Hiltunen, R., Kahlas-Tarkka, L., Kytö, M., Peikola, M. & Rissanen, M. 2009. Linguistic introduction. In Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt, B. Rosenthal, G. A. Adams, M. Burns, P. Grund, R. Hiltunen, L. Kahlas-Tarkka, M. Kytö, M. Peikola, B. C. Ray, M. Rissanen, M. K. Roach & R. Trask (eds), 64–90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grund, P., Kytö, M. & Rissanen, M. 2004. Editing the Salem witchcraft records: An exploration of a linguistic treasury. American Speech 79: 146–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiltunen, R. & Peikola, M. 2007. Trial discourse and manuscript context: Scribal profiles in the Salem witchcraft records. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8: 43–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, B. 2011. Dialect enregisterment in performance. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15(5): 657–679. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, A. H. (ed.). 1995. Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 35]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, A. H. & Taavitsainen, I. (eds). 2010. Historical Pragmatics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kautzsch, A. 2002. The Historical Evolution of Earlier African American English. An Empirical Comparison of Early Sources. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012. Earlier African American Vernacular English. In The Mouton World Atlas of Variation in English, B. Kortmann & K. Lunkenheimer (eds), 126–140. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kortmann, B. & Lunkenheimer, K. (eds). 2012. The Mouton World Atlas of Variation in English. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krapp, G. P. 1960 [1925]. The English Language in America (I-II). New York: Frederick Ungar Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Kretzschmar, W. A., Jr. 2014. Complex systems in the history of English. In Developments in English: Expanding Electronic Evidence, I. Taavitsainen, M. Kytö, C. Claridge & J. Smith (eds), 251–264. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015. Language and Complex Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kurath, H. et al. 1939. The Linguistic Atlas of New England. New York: AMS Press.Google Scholar
Kytö, M. 1991. Variation and Diachrony, with Early American English in Focus: Studies on can/may and shall/will. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2004. The emergence of American English: Evidence from 17th-century records in New England. In The Legacy of Colonial English: Studies in Transported Dialects, R. Hickey (ed.), 121–157. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2020. English in North America. In The Cambridge Handbook of World Englishes, D. Schreier, M. Hundt & E. W. Schneider (eds), 160–184. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lederer, R. M., Jr. 1985. Colonial American English. Essex, Connecticut: A Verbatim Book.Google Scholar
Marckwardt, A. H. 1958. American English. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mencken, H. L. 1963 [1919]. The American Language. An Inquiry into the Development of English in the United States. The fourth edition and the two supplements, abridged, with annotations and new material, by Raven I. McDavid, Jr. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Montgomery, M. 1989. Exploring the roots of Appalachian English. English World-Wide 10(2): 227–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994. The evolution of verb concord in Scots. In Studies in Scots and Gaelic: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on the Languages of Scotland, A. Fenton & D. A. MacDonald (eds), 81–95. Edinburgh: Cannongate Academic.Google Scholar
1996. Was colonial American English a koine? In Speech Past and Present: Studies in English Dialectology in Memory of Ossi Ihalainen [University of Bamberg Studies in English Linguistics 38], J. Klemola, M. Kytö & M. Rissanen (eds), 213–235. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
1997. The Scotch-Irish element in Appalachian English: How broad? How deep? In Ulster and North America: Transatlantic Perspectives on the Scotch-lrish, C. Wood & T. Blethen (eds), 189–212. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Montgomery, M., Ellis, M. & Cooper, B. 2014. When did Southern American English really begin? In The Evolution of Englishes. The Dynamic Model and beyond, S. Buschfeld, T. Hoffmann, M. Huber & A. Kautzsch (eds), 331–348. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, M., Fuller, J. M. & DeMarse, S. 1993. “The black men has wives and sweet harts [and third person plural ‑s] jest like the white men”: Evidence for verbal ‑s from written documents on 19th-century African American Speech. Language Variation and Change 5: 335–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, S. S. 1996. The development of American Englishes: Some questions from a creole genesis perspective. In Focus on USA, E. W. Schneider (ed.), 231–264. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Orbeck, A. 1927. Early New England Pronunciation as Reflected in Some Seventeenth Century Town Records of Eastern Massachusetts. Ann Arbor, Michigan: G. Wahr.Google Scholar
Pederson, L. 1977. Studies of American pronunciation since 1945. American Speech 52: 262–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poplack, S. & Tagliamonte, S. 2001. African American English in the Diaspora. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Poplack, S., Walker, J. A. & Malcolmson, R. 2006. An English “like no other”?: Language contact and change in Quebec. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 51 (2–3): 185–213.Google Scholar
Read, A. W. 1938. The assimilation of the speech of British immigrants in colonial America. The Journal of English and Germanic Philology 37: 70–79.Google Scholar
Rissanen, M. 1984. The choice of relative pronouns in seventeenth-century American English. In Historical Syntax, J. Fisiak (ed.), 417–435. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1985. Periphrastic ‘do’ in affirmative statements in early American English. Journal of English Linguistics 18: 163–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997. ‘Candy no witch, Barbados’: Salem witchcraft trials as evidence of early American English. In Language in Time and Space. Studies in Honour of Wolfgang Viereck on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday, H. Ramisch & K. Wynne (eds), 183–193. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, B., Adams, G. A., Burns, M., Grund, P., Hiltunen, R., Kahlas-Tarkka, L., Peikola, M., Ray, B. C., Rissanen, M., Roach, M. K. & Trask, R. (eds). 2009. Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rudanko, J. 2011. Changes in Complementation in British and American English: Corpus-Based Studies on Non-Finite Complements in Recent English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, E. W. 1989. American Earlier Black English. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
2004. The English dialect heritage of the southern United States. In Legacies of Colonial English. Studies in Transported Dialects, R. Hickey (ed.), 262–309. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2007. Postcolonial English. Varieties around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012. Tracking the evolution of vernaculars: Corpus linguistics and earlier U.S. Englishes. In Corpus Linguistics and Variation in English, J. Mukherjee & M. Huber (eds), 185–212. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Schneider, E. W. & Montgomery, M. 2001. On the trail of early nonstandard grammar: An electronic corpus of Southern U.S. Antebellum overseers’ letters. American Speech 76(4): 388–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siebers, L. 2015. Assessing heterogeneity. In Letter Writing and Language Change, A. Auer, D. Schreier & R. Watts (eds), 240–263. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019. “This is all answer soon”: African American vernacular letters from the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. In Keeping in Touch. Emigrant Letters across the English-Speaking World, R. Hickey (ed.), 213–237. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stein, D. 1990. Functional differentiation in the emerging English standard language: The evolution of a morphological discourse and style marker. In Historical Linguistics 1987 [Current Issues in Linguistic Thoery 66], H. Andersen & K. Koerner (eds), 489–498. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, E. 1956. Linguistic resources of the Southern Historical Collection. American Speech 31: 271–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, S. 2008. So different and pretty cool: Recycling intensifiers in Toronto. English Language and Linguistics 12(2): 361–394. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, S. A. & D. Denis. 2014. Expanding the transmission/diffusion dichotomy: Evidence from Canada. Language 90: 90–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, R. 1994. Mobility & Migration. East Anglian Founders of New England, 1629–1640. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. 1986. Dialects in Contact [Language and Society 10]. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Van Herk, G. & Poplack, S. 2003. Rewriting the past: Bare verbs in the Ottawa Repository of Early African American Correspondence. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 18 (2): 231–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Viereck, W. 1982. Das amerikanische Englisch in Forschung und Lehre. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 49: 351–365.Google Scholar
1985. On the origins and developments of American English. In Papers from the 6th International Conference on Historical Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 34], J. Fisiak (ed.), 561–569. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Webster, N. 1828. An American Dictionary of the English Language. New York: S. Converse.Google Scholar