Cover not available
Part of
Earlier North American Englishes
Edited by Merja Kytö and Lucia Siebers
[Varieties of English Around the World G66] 2022
► pp. 37–64

Coordination in the courtroom

The uses of and in the records of the Salem witchcraft trials

| Uppsala University
Previous research has shown that clausal and phrasal uses of and pattern in ways characteristic of different text types in both Present-day and early English. Speech-based text types such as witness depositions and trial records are likely to show higher rates of clausal uses than written-based texts such as science and history writing. The present study turns to the uses of and in a unique resource, the records from the Salem witchcraft trials in New England (1692–1693), comprising a range of speech-related and written-based text categories. To enable comparisons between early American English and British English usage, comparative material is drawn from the Helsinki Corpus and the Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760.
Keywords: conjunction and , Salem witchcraft trials, A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760 , past spoken interaction, genre
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Material and method
    • 2.1The records of the Salem witchcraft trials
    • 2.2The Salem texts included in the present study
    • 2.3Points of comparison: CED and Helsinki Corpus texts
    • 2.4Coordinating and : Principles of classification and research questions
    • 2.5Frequency analyses
  • 3.Clausal and phrasal uses of and
    • 3.1Proportional use of clausal and phrasal and
    • 3.2Rates of occurrence for clausal and phrasal and
  • 4. and in interactive contexts: Exchange coordination
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 15 July 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g66.03kyt
References (34)
References
Alexander, H. 1927–1928. The language of the Salem witchcraft trials. American Speech 3: 390–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., with J. Egbert, B. Gray, R. Oppliger & B. Szmrecsanyi. 2016. Variationist versus text-linguistic approaches to grammatical change in English: Nominal modifiers of head nouns. In The Cambridge Handbook of English Historical Linguistics, M. Kytö & P. Pahta (eds), 351–375. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E. 1999. The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Boyer, P. & Nissenbaum, S. (eds). 1977. The Salem Witchcraft Papers. 3 vols. New York: Da Capo Press.Google Scholar
Buckingham Mouheb, R. 2012. Yale Under God. Maitland, FL: Xulon Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. 1982. Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. In Spoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy, D. Tannen (ed.), 35–53. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. & Danielewicz, J. 1987. Properties of spoken and written language. In Comprehending Oral and Written Language, R. Horowitz & S. J. Samuels (eds), 83–113. San Diego, New York, etc.: Academic Press.Google Scholar
CHEAL = The Cambridge History of English and American Literature in 18 Volumes (1907–1921). VOLUME XVII. Later National Literature, Part II - XXIII. Education. - § 10. Ezekiel Cheever. [URL] (23 January 2022).
Cremin, L. A. 1970. American Education: The Colonial Experience 1607–1783. New York etc.: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. & Kytö, M. 2010. Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grund, P. 2007a. From tongue to text: The transmission of the Salem witchcraft examination records. American Speech 82 (2): 119–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007b. The anatomy of correction: Additions, cancellations, and changes in the documents of the Salem witchcraft trials. Studia Neophilologica 79 (1): 3–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grund, P. J., Burns, M. & Peikola, M. 2014. The vagaries of manuscripts from the Salem witch trials: An edition of four (re-)discovered documents from the case against Margaret Scott of Rowley. Studia Neophilologica, 86(1), 37–50.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
Google Scholar
Grund, P., Hiltunen, R., Kahlas-Tarkka, L., Kytö, M., Peikola, M. & Rissanen, M. 2009. Linguistic introduction. In Rosenthal et al . (eds), 64–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grund, P., Kytö, M. & Rissanen, M. 2004. Editing the Salem witchcraft records: An exploration of a linguistic treasury. American Speech 79 (2), 146–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grund, P. J. & Walker, T. 2011. Genre characteristics. In Testifying to Language and Life in Early Modern England, M. Kytö, P. J. Grund and T. Walker, 15–56. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiltunen, R. 1996. ‘Tell me, be you a witch?’ Questions in the Salem witchcraft trials of 1692. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 9 (25): 17–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiltunen, R. & Peikola, M. 2007. Trial discourse and manuscript context: Scribal profiles in the Salem witchcraft records. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8 (1): 43–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kytö, M. 1991. Variation and Diachrony, with Early American English in Focus: Studies on can/may and shall/will [University of Bamberg Studies in English Linguistics 28]. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
2004. The emergence of American English: Evidence from seventeenth-century records in New England. In Legacies of Colonial English: Studies in Transported Dialects, R. Hickey (ed.), 121–157. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kytö, M. & Walker, T. 2003. The linguistic study of Early Modern English speech-related texts: How “bad” can “bad” data be? Journal of English Linguistics 31 (3): 221–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mappen, M. 1996. Witches & Histories: Interpretations of Salem. 2nd ed. Malabar, FL: Krieger.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Johansson, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rissanen, M. 1997. “Candy no witch, Barbardos”: Salem witchcraft trials as evidence of early American English. In Language in Time and Space. Studies in Honour of Wolfgang Viereck on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday, H. Ramisch & K. Wynne (eds), 183–193. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, B. 1993. Salem Story: Reading the Witch Trials of 1692. Cambridge etc.: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009. General introduction. In Rosenthal et al . (eds), 15–20.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, B., Adams, G. A., Burns, M., Grund, P., Hiltunen, R., Kahlas-Tarkka, L., Peikola, M., Ray, B. C., Rissanen, M., Roach, M. K. & Trask, R. (eds). 2009. Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smitterberg, E. 2014. Syntactic stability and change in nineteenth-century newspaper language. In Late Modern English Syntax, M. Hundt (ed.), 311–329. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, E. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. C. 1986. On the origins of ‘and’ and ‘but’ connectives in English. Studies in Language 10 (1): 137–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Woodward, W. E. (ed.). 1864–1865. Records of Salem Witchcraft Copied from the Original Documents. 2 vols. Roxbury, MA: W. E. Woodward.Google Scholar
Cited by (21)

Cited by 21 other publications

Aijmer, Karin
2020. Chapter 15. Sort of and kind of from an English-Swedish perspective. In Voices Past and Present - Studies of Involved, Speech-related and Spoken Texts [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 97], ► pp. 248 ff. DOI logo
Anderwald, Lieselotte
2020. Chapter 12. American English gotten. In Voices Past and Present - Studies of Involved, Speech-related and Spoken Texts [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 97], ► pp. 188 ff. DOI logo
Archer, Dawn & Alison Findlay
2020. Chapter 3. Keywords that characterise Shakespeare’s (anti)heroes and villains. In Voices Past and Present - Studies of Involved, Speech-related and Spoken Texts [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 97], ► pp. 32 ff. DOI logo
Berglund Prytz, Ylva
2020. Chapter 14. Return to the future. In Voices Past and Present - Studies of Involved, Speech-related and Spoken Texts [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 97], ► pp. 228 ff. DOI logo
Biber, Douglas & Jesse Egbert
2020. Chapter 19. Orality on the searchable web. In Voices Past and Present - Studies of Involved, Speech-related and Spoken Texts [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 97], ► pp. 318 ff. DOI logo
Claridge, Claudia
2020. Chapter 9. Epistemic adverbs in the Old Bailey Corpus. In Voices Past and Present - Studies of Involved, Speech-related and Spoken Texts [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 97], ► pp. 134 ff. DOI logo
Culpeper, Jonathan
2020. Foreword. In Voices Past and Present - Studies of Involved, Speech-related and Spoken Texts [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 97], ► pp. xii ff. DOI logo
Culpeper, Jonathan & Samuel J. Oliver
2020. Chapter 2. Pragmatic noise in Shakespeare’s plays. In Voices Past and Present - Studies of Involved, Speech-related and Spoken Texts [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 97], ► pp. 12 ff. DOI logo
Denison, David
2020. Chapter 13. Explaining explanatory so. In Voices Past and Present - Studies of Involved, Speech-related and Spoken Texts [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 97], ► pp. 208 ff. DOI logo
Hickey, Raymond
2020. Chapter 11. Sure in Irish English. In Voices Past and Present - Studies of Involved, Speech-related and Spoken Texts [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 97], ► pp. 174 ff. DOI logo
Jonsson, Ewa & Tove Larsson
2020. Chapter 1. Voices of English. In Voices Past and Present - Studies of Involved, Speech-related and Spoken Texts [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 97], ► pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Oksefjell Ebeling, Signe & Hilde Hasselgård
2020. Chapter 18. Intensification in dialogue vs. narrative in a corpus of present-day English fiction. In Voices Past and Present - Studies of Involved, Speech-related and Spoken Texts [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 97], ► pp. 302 ff. DOI logo
Peikola, Matti
2020. Chapter 8. Patterns of reader involvement on sixteenth-century English title pages, with special reference to second-person pronouns. In Voices Past and Present - Studies of Involved, Speech-related and Spoken Texts [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 97], ► pp. 114 ff. DOI logo
Ronan, Patricia
2020. Chapter 10. Question strategies in the Old Bailey Corpus. In Voices Past and Present - Studies of Involved, Speech-related and Spoken Texts [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 97], ► pp. 154 ff. DOI logo
Rudanko, Juhani
2020. Chapter 4. Revealing speech. In Voices Past and Present - Studies of Involved, Speech-related and Spoken Texts [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 97], ► pp. 48 ff. DOI logo
Schwarz, Sarah & Erik Smitterberg
2020. Chapter 17. “If anyone would have told me, I would have not believed it”. In Voices Past and Present - Studies of Involved, Speech-related and Spoken Texts [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 97], ► pp. 284 ff. DOI logo
Smith, Jeremy J.
2020. Chapter 7. Godly vocabulary in Early Modern English religious debate. In Voices Past and Present - Studies of Involved, Speech-related and Spoken Texts [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 97], ► pp. 96 ff. DOI logo
Stenström, Anna-Brita
2020. Chapter 16. From yes to innit. In Voices Past and Present - Studies of Involved, Speech-related and Spoken Texts [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 97], ► pp. 266 ff. DOI logo
Taavitsainen, Irma
2020. Chapter 6. Interjections in early popular literature. In Voices Past and Present - Studies of Involved, Speech-related and Spoken Texts [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 97], ► pp. 80 ff. DOI logo
Walker, Terry & Peter J. Grund
2020. Chapter 5. Saying, crying, replying, and continuing. In Voices Past and Present - Studies of Involved, Speech-related and Spoken Texts [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 97], ► pp. 64 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. Voices Past and Present - Studies of Involved, Speech-related and Spoken Texts [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 97], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.