Cover not available
Part of
New Englishes, New Methods
Edited by Guyanne Wilson and Michael Westphal
[Varieties of English Around the World G68] 2023
► pp. 132–155

Analysing the speech rhythm of New Englishes

A guide to researchers and a case study on Pakistani, Philippine, Nigerian, and British English

ORCID logo | University of Hamburg

Most New Englishes are classified as syllable-timed and many L1 varieties of English as stress-timed. However, much empirical work on varieties of English and other languages has shown that a categorical distinction between discrete rhythm classes is not commensurate with the empirical evidence. Moreover, the comparability of published research is hampered by a lack of methodological standardization. This chapter provides a step-by-step guide for researchers and charts new avenues for future enquiries, illustrated with a case study comparing Pakistani, Nigerian, Philippine, and British English. Results indicate that the first three can be described as more syllable-timed than British English, but also that a binary classification of syllable- vs. stress-timed does not fully do justice to the results.

Keywords: Speech rhythm, prosody, phonetics, Pakistani English, Philippine English, Nigerian English, British English
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Measuring Speech Rhythm in New Englishes
  • 3.Research questions
  • 4.Methodology: A step-by-step guide
    • 4.1Elicitation of speech data
      • Compare like with like
      • Speech styles
      • Empirical depth
      • Comparability across studies
    • 4.2Annotation and segmentation
    • 4.3Calculation of rhythm metrics
    • 4.4Statistical analysis
  • 5.Reporting results
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 14 April 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g68.07fuc
References
Abercrombie, David
1967 Elements of General Phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Arvaniti, Amalia
2009 “Rhythm, Timing and the Timing of Rhythm.” Phonetica 66 (1–2): 46–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Martin Maechler, Ben Bolker, & Steve Walker
2015 “Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using Ime4.” Journal of Statistical Software 67 (1): 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braun, Bettina, & Sabine Geiselmann
2011 “Italian in the No-Man’s Land between Stress-Timing and Syllable-Timing?: Speakers are More Stress-Timed Than Listeners.” Interspeech: 2697–2700. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooke, Martin, Maria L. Garcia Lecumberri, & Jon Barker
2008 “The Foreign Language Cocktail Party Problem: Energetic and Informational Masking Effects in Non-Native Speech Perception.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 123 (1): 414–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dauer, Rebecca M.
1983 “Stress-Timing and Syllable-Timing Reanalyzed.” Journal of Phonetics 11 (1): 51–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deterding, David
2001 “The Measurement of Rhythm: A Comparison of Singapore and British English.” Journal of Phonetics 29 (2): 217–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 “The North Wind Versus a Wolf: Short Texts for the Description and Measurement of English Pronunciation.” Journal of the International Phonetic Association 36 (2): 187–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dita, Shirley N., & Kristine D. De Leon
2017 “The Intelligibility and Comprehensibility of Philippine English to EFL Speakers.” Philippine ESL Journal 19 (2): 100–118.Google Scholar
Fox, John, & Milan Bouchet-Valat
2020 Rcmdr: R Commander. R Package Version 2.7–1. [URL] (13 July 2022).
Fuchs, Robert
2014a “You Got the Beat: Rhythm and Timing.” In Readings in English Phonetics and Phonology, eds. by Rafael Monroy-Casas, & Inmaculada de J. Arboleda Guirao, 165–188. Valencia: IULMA-UV.Google Scholar
2014b “Integrating Variability in Loudness and Duration in a Multidimensional Model of Speech Rhythm: Evidence from Indian English and British English.” In Speech Prosody 7, eds. by Nick Campbell, Dafydd Gibbon, & Daniel Hirst, 290–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 Speech Rhythm in Varieties of English: Evidence from Educated Indian English and British English. Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gasparini, Loreta, Alan Langus, Sho Tsuji, & Natalie Boll-Avetisyan
2021 “Quantifying the Role of Rhythm in Infants’ Language Discrimination Abilities: A Meta-Analysis.” Cognition 213: 104757. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbon, Dafydd
fc. “The Rhythms of Rhythm.” Journal of the International Phonetic Association. DOI logo
Gut, Ulrike
2004 “Nigerian English: Phonology.” In A Handbook of Varieties of English Volume 1: Phonology, eds. by Bernd Kortmann, & Edgar Schneider, 813–830. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2005 “Nigerian English Prosody.” English World-Wide 26 (2): 153–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hothorn, Torsten, Frank Bretz, & Peter Westfall
2008 “Simultaneous Inference in General Parametric Models.” Biometrical Journal 50 (3): 346–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
IBM Corp
2020 IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 27.0 [Computer software]. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.Google Scholar
Kachru, Braj B.
1985 “Standards, Codification and Sociolinguistic Realism: The English Language in the Outer Circle.” In English in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and Literatures, eds. by Randolph Quirk, & Henry Widdowson, 11–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kisler, Thomas, Uwe D. Reichel, & Florian Schiel
2017 “Multilingual Processing of Speech via Web Services.” Computer Speech & Language 45: 326–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kohler, Klaus J.
2009 “Rhythm in Speech and Language.” Phonetica, 66 (1–2): 29–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd, & Edgar Schneider
(eds) 2004 A Handbook of Varieties of English Volume 1: Phonology. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Low, Ling, Esther Grabe, & Francis Nolan
2000 “Quantitative Characterizations of Speech Rhythm: Syllable-Timing in Singapore English.” Language and Speech 43 (4): 377–401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Machač, Pavel, & Radek Skarnitzl
2009 Principles of Phonetic Segmentation. Prague: Epocha.Google Scholar
Nolan, Francis, & Hae-Sung Jeon
2014 “Speech Rhythm: A Metaphor?.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 369 (1658): 20130396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Payne, Elinor, & Olga Maxwell
2018 “Durational Variability as a Marker of Prosodic Structure in Indian English(es).” Speech Prosody 9, 749–753. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pike, Kenneth L.
1945 The Intonation of American English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Rahman, Tariq
1991 “Pakistani English: Some Phonological and Phonetic Features.” World Englishes 10 (1): 83–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
2021 R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Computer software]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL] (13 July 2022).
Reddy, Sravana, & James Stanford
2015 “A Web Application for Automated Dialect Analysis.” Proceedings of NAACL-HLT, Denver, Colorado. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
RStudio Team
2021 RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, PBC [Computer software]. Boston, MA. [URL] (14 July 2022).
Tremblay, Antoine, & Johannes Ransijn
2020 LMERConvenienceFunctions: Model Selection and Post-Hoc Analysis for (G)LMER Models. R package Version 3.0. [URL] (13 July 2022).
White, Laurence, & Sven L. Mattys
2007 “Calibrating Rhythm: First Language and Second Language Studies.” Journal of Phonetics 35 (4): 501–522. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, Laurence, Sven L. Mattys, & Lukas Wiget
2012 “Language Categorization by Adults is Based on Sensitivity to Durational Cues, not Rhythm Class.” Journal of Memory and Language 66 (4): 665–679. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiget, Lukas, Laurence White, Barbara Schuppler, Izabelle Grenon, Olesya Rauch, & Sven L. Mattys
2010 “How Stable are Acoustic Metrics of Contrastive Speech Rhythm?” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 127 (3): 1559–1569. DOI logoGoogle Scholar