Whether spelling is phonemic is only one factor in whether a writing system is suitable for a given language; another consideration
is "lexical distinctiveness" of spelling, in two separate senses, and the importance of lexical distinctiveness grows as a writing
system matures. Seen in this light, the increasing irregularity of English spelling, over the period when English has been a
written language, has been a desirable response to the changing needs of the English-speaking world.
Andoni Duñabeita, Jon and Eduardo Vidal-Abarca. 2008. “Children
like dense neighborhoods: orthographic neighborhood density effects in novel readers”. The
Spanish Journal of
Psychology 111.26–35.
Cahill, Michael. 2014. “Non-linguistic
factors in orthographies”. In Cahill and Rice, eds, 2014: 9–25.
Cahill, Michael and Keren Rice, eds. 2014. Developing
Orthographies for Unwritten Languages. SIL International (Dallas, Texas).
Chomsky, Noam and Morris Halle. 1968. The
Sound Pattern of English. Harper & Row (New York).
Cole, Michael and Jennifer. 2006. Rethinking
the Goody myth. In D. R. Olson and M. Cole, eds, Technology,
Literacy, and the Evolution of Society: implications of the work of Jack Goody, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (Mahwah, N.J.).
DeFrancis, John. 1984. The
Chinese Language: fact and fantasy. University of Hawai’i Press (Honolulu).
DeFrancis, John. 1989. Visible
Speech: the diverse oneness of writing systems. University of Hawai’i Press (Honolulu).
Frantz, Donald G.1978. “Abstractness of phonology and
Blackfoot orthography design”. In William C. McCormack and Stephen A. Wurm, eds, Approaches
to Language: anthropological
issues, pp. 307–26. Mouton (the Hague).
Goody, Jack. 1977. The
Domestication of the Savage Mind. Cambridge University Press.
Goody, Jack and Ian Watt. 1963. The
consequences of literacy. Comparative Studies in Society and
History 51.304–45. Reprinted
in Goody, ed., Literacy in
Traditional Societies, Cambridge University Press, 1968, and in P. P. Giglioli, ed., Language
and Social Context: selected
readings, Penguin (Harmondsworth, Mddx.), 1972.
Halle, Morris. 1959. The
Sound Pattern of Russian. Mouton (the Hague).
Hannas, William. 1997. Asia’s
Orthographic Dilemma. University of Hawai’i Press (Honolulu).
Hannas, William. 2003. The
Writing on the Wall: how Asian orthography curbs creativity. University of Pittsburgh Press (Philadelphia).
Jones, Daniel. 1944. The
Phonetic Aspect of Spelling Reform. Simplified Spelling Society pamphlet no.
8. Sir Isaac Pitman and Sons (London).
Jones, Daniel. 1967. The
Phoneme: its nature and use (3rd edn). Cambridge University Press (Cambridge).
McBride, Catherine, Xiuhong Tong, and Jianhong Mo. 2015. Developmental
dyslexia in Chinese. In W. S. -Y. Wang and Chaofen Sun, eds, The
Oxford Handbook of Chinese Linguistics, Oxford University Press.
Mattingly, Ignatius. 1972. Reading,
the linguistic process, and linguistic awareness. In J. F. Kavanagh and I. G. Mattingly, eds, Language
by Ear and Eye, MIT Press (Cambridge, Mass.).
OECD. 2016. PISA 2015: results in
focus. Online at <[URL]>, accessed 7 Dec 2016.
Peng, Dan-ling and Jiang, Hua. 2006. “Naming
of Chinese phonograms: from cognitive science to cognitive
neuroscience”. In Ping Liet al., eds, 2006: 346–57.
Perea, Manuel and Eva Rosa. 2000. “The
effects of orthographic neighborhood in reading and laboratory word identification tasks: a
review”. Psicológica 211.327–40.
Pike, Kenneth L.1947. Phonemics: a technique for reducing
languages to writing. University of Michigan Press (Ann Arbor).
Ping, Liet al., eds. 2006. The
Handbook of East Asian Psycholinguistics, vol. 1: Chinese. Cambridge University Press (Cambridge).
Powell, Barry. 1991. Homer
and the Origin of the Greek Alphabet. Cambridge University Press (Cambridge).
Ripman, Walter and William Archer. 1948. New
Spelling (6th edn). Sir Isaac Pitman and Sons (London).
Sampson, Geoffrey. 1994. Chinese
script and the diversity of writing
systems. Linguistics 321.117–32.
Sampson, Geoffrey. 2015. Writing
Systems (2nd
edn). Equinox (Sheffield).
Schuessler, Axel. 2007. ABC
Etymological Dictionary of Old Chinese. University of Hawai’i Press (Honolulu).
Shu, Hua and Wu, Ningning. 2006. “Growth
of orthography-phonology knowledge in the Chinese writing
system”. In Ping Liet al., eds, 2006: 103–13. Cambridge University Press (Cambridge).
Snider, Keith. 2014. “Orthography
and phonological depth”. In Cahill and Rice 2014: 27–48.
Taylor, Insup and M. Martin. 1983. The
Psychology of Reading. Academic Press (New York).
Trudgill, Peter. 2011. Sociolinguistic
Typology: social determinants of linguistic complexity. Oxford University Press.
Yeshaya, Joachim J. M. S.2014. “In the name of the God of
Israel: Judeo-Arabic language and literature”. In Johannes den Heijer, Andrea Schmidt, and Tamara Pataridze, eds, Scripts
Beyond Borders: a survey of allographic traditions in the Euro-Mediterranean
world, 527–38. Institut Orientaliste de l’Université Catholique de Louvain (Louvain-la-Neuve).
Zhao, Jing, Li Qing-Lin, and Bi Hong-Yan. 2012. “The
characteristics of Chinese orthographic neighborhood size effect for developing readers”. PLOS
ONE8Oct 2012; .
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
Meletis, Dimitrios
2024. Alphabet. In Reference Module in Social Sciences,
Pae, Hye K.
2024. From the Phonemic Principle to the Morphophonological Principle. In Analyzing the Korean Alphabet, ► pp. 153 ff.
Shalhoub-Awwad, Yasmin & Ravit Cohen-Mimran
2024. On the role of morphology in early spelling in Hebrew and Arabic. Morphology 34:2 ► pp. 151 ff.
Joyce, Terry & Hisashi Masuda
2023. Chaos or system?. Written Language & Literacy 26:1 ► pp. 57 ff.
Share, David L.
2023. Literacy and Illiteracy in Africa: The Tower of Babel Predicament. In Handbook of Literacy in Africa [Literacy Studies, 24], ► pp. 1 ff.
Joyce, Terry & Dimitrios Meletis
2021. Alternative criteria for writing system typology. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 40:3 ► pp. 257 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.