Article published in:

Understanding Writing Systems
Edited by Merijn Beeksma and Martin Neef
[Written Language & Literacy 21:1] 2018
► pp. 52–88

What is natural in writing?

Prolegomena to a Natural Grapholinguistics

Dimitrios Meletis | University of Graz

Naturalness Theory (NT) is founded on the notion of naturalness and claims that when a linguistic phenomenon can be processed by humans with little effort, both sensomotorically and cognitively, it is deemed more natural compared to other, more complex phenomena. Drawing on evidence such as language change, language acquisition, and language disorders, various parameters of naturalness (e.g., biuniqueness, constructional iconicity) have been postulated, which focus on the phonological and morphological subsystems of language. This paper offers an outline of how naturalness can be adapted to grapholinguistic phenomena. Comparative graphematics (cf. Weingarten 2011), extended to comparative grapholinguistics, is assessed as a method that can be used to reveal naturalness parameters which apply to both material (graphetic) and linguistic (graphematic) aspects of writing. The reduction of extrinsic symmetry across various scripts will be discussed as an example. By integrating these preliminary theoretical ideas into the framework of NT, it is demonstrated that so-called Natural Grapholinguistics could offer promising new insights as well as a tertium comparationis method for future comparative analyses of scripts and writing systems.

Keywords: cross-linguistic studies, grapholinguistics, script, writing system, naturalness theory, comparative grapholinguistics, naturalness, natural grapholinguistics

Published online: 02 November 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00010.mel

References

Anbar, Ada

(1986) Reading acquisition of preschool children without systematic instruction. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 1: 69–83.

Bailey, Charles-James N.

(1974) Naturalness in historical reconstruction and changes that are not natural. In Anthony Bruck (ed.), Papers from the parasession on Natural Phonology, April 18, 1974, 13–20. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

(1984) The concept of balance and linguistic naturalness. Language Sciences 6.2: 229–238.

Balestra, Miriam, Annalen Appelt & Martin Neef

(2014) Systematische Beschränkungen für Schreibungen im grammatischen Wortschatz des Deutschen: der Konsonant [f]. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 33.2: 129–163.

Baroni, Antonio

(2011) Alphabetic vs. non-alphabetic writing: linguistic fit and natural tendencies. Rivista di Linguistica 23.2: 127–159.

Berg, Kristian

(2016) Graphematische Variation. In Birgit Mesch & Christina Noack (eds.), System, Norm und Gebrauch – drei Seiten derselben Medaille? Orthographische Kompetenz und Performanz zwischen System, Norm und Empirie, 9–23. Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Hohengehren.

Bertacca, Antonio

(2002) Description and explanation of language change. In Katarzyna Dziubalska-Kołaczyk & Jarosław Weckwerth (eds.), Future challenges for Natural Linguistics, 1–23. München: LINCOM.

Bigozzi, Luca, Christian Tarchi & Giuliana Pinto

(2016) Spelling across tasks and levels of language in a transparent orthography. PLoS ONE 11.9: e0163033.

Birnbacher, Dieter

(2014) Naturalness: is the ‘natural’ preferable to the ‘artificial’? Transl. by David Carus. Lanham: University Press of America.

Bittner, Andreas

(1988) Is anything ‘more natural’? Considerations on establishing a hierarchy of naturalness principles (NP). Linguistische Studien A 188: 23–35.

Brosh, Hezi

(2015) Arabic spelling: errors, perceptions, and strategies. Foreign Language Annals 48.4: 584–603.

Cahill, Michael

(2014) Non-linguistic factors in orthographies. In Michael Cahill & Keren Rice (eds.), Developing orthographies for unwritten languages, 9–25. Dallas: SIL International.

Changizi, Mark A. & Shinsuke Shimojo

(2005) Character complexity and redundancy in writing systems over human history. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 272: 267–275.

Changizi, Mark A., Qiong Zhang, Hao Ye & Shinsuke Shimojo

(2006) The structures of letters and symbols throughout human history are selected to match those found in objects in natural scenes. The American Naturalist 167.5: E117–E139.

Chao, Yuen Ren

(1968) Language and symbolic systems. Cambridge: CUP.

Chen, Ping

(2004) Modern Chinese: history and sociolinguistics. Cambridge: CUP.

Cook, Vivian & Benedetta Bassetti

(2005) An introduction to researching second language writing systems. In Vivian Cook & Benedetta Bassetti (eds.), Second language writing systems, 1–67. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Coulmas, Florian

(1996) The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Blackwell.

(2009) Evaluating merit – the evolution of writing reconsidered. Writing Systems Research 1.1: 5–17.

Crocco Galèas, Grazia

(1998) The parameters of Natural Morphology. Padova: Unipress.

Daniels, Peter T.

(1990) Fundamentals of grammatology. Journal of the American Oriental Society 110.4: 727–731.

(2006) On beyond alphabets. Written Language and Literacy 9.1: 7–24.

(2009a) Grammatology. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy, 25–45. Cambridge: CUP.

(2009b) Two notes on terminology. Written Language and Literacy 12.2: 277–281.

(2017) Writing systems. In Mark Aronoff & Janie Rees-Miller (eds.), The handbook of linguistics, 2nd edition, 75–94. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.

(2018) An exploration of writing. Bristol: Equinox.

Derrida, Jacques

(1967) De la grammatologie. Paris: Ed. de Minuit.

Donegan, Patricia & David Stampe

(1979) The study of Natural Phonology. In Daniel A. Dinnsen & Stephen R. Anderson (eds.), Current approaches to phonological theory, 126–173. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

(2009) Hypotheses of Natural Phonology. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 45.1: 1–31.

Dressler, Wolfgang U.

(1980) Naturalness as a principle in genetic and typological linguistics: introduction. In Torben Thrane, Vibeke Winge, Lachlan Mackenzie, Una Canger & Niels Ege (eds.), Typology and genetics of language, 75–91. Copenhagen: Linguistic Circle of Copenhagen.

(1988) Zur Bedeutung der Sprachtypologie in der Natürlichen Morphologie. In Jens Lüdtke (ed.), Energeia und Ergon, Vol. 3, 199–208. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.

(1989) Semiotische Parameter einer textlinguistischen Natürlichkeitstheorie. Wien: Verlag d. Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.

(1999a) What is natural in Natural Morphology (NM)? Prague Linguistic Circle Papers 3: 135–144.

(1999b) On a semiotic theory of preferences in language. Peirce Seminar Papers 4: 389–415.

(2000) Naturalness. In Geert Booij, Christian Lehmann, Joachim Mugdan, Wolfgang Kesselheim & Stavros Skopeteas (eds.), Morphology: an international handbook of inflection and word-formation, Vol. 1, 288–296. Berlin & Boston: de Gruyter.

(2006) Natural Morphology. In E. K. Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, 539–540. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Dressler, Wolfgang U., Willi Mayerthaler, Oswald Panagl & Wolfgang U. Wurzel

(1987) Leitmotifs in Natural Morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Dressler, Wolfgang U., Gary Libben & Katharina Korecky-Kröll

(2014) Conflicting vs. convergent vs. interdependent motivations in morphology. In Brian MacWhinney, Andrej Malchukov & Edith Moravcsik (eds.), Competing motivations in grammar and usage, 181–196. Oxford: OUP.

Dürscheid, Christa

(2016) Einführung in die Schriftlinguistik. 5th edition. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, Katarzyna

(2002) Challenges for Natural Linguistics in the 21st century: a personal view. In Katarzyna Dziubalska-Kołaczyk & Jarosław Weckwerth (eds.), Future challenges for Natural Linguistics, 103–128. München: LINCOM.

Ehlich, Konrad

(2007) Sprache und sprachliches Handeln. Berlin & Boston: de Gruyter.

Fedorova, Liudmila L.

(2013) The development of graphic representation in abugida writing: the akshara’s grammar. Lingua Posnaniensis 55.2: 49–66.

Fishman, Joshua

(1977) Advances in the creation and revision of writing systems. The Hague: Mouton.

Fuhrhop, Nanna & Franziska Buchmann

(2009) Die Längenhierarchie: Zum Bau der graphematischen Silbe. Linguistische Berichte 218: 127–155.

Gelb, Ignace Jay

(1969) A Study of Writing. 2nd edition (3rd impression). Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.

Giannouli, Vaitsa

(2013) Visual symmetry perception. Encephalos 50: 31–42.

Gnanadesikan, Amalia E.

(2017) Towards a typology of phonemic scripts. Writing Systems Research 9.1: 14–35.

Gregg, Noël

(1995) Written expression disorders. Dordrecht: Springer.

Günther, Hartmut

(1988) Schriftliche Sprache: Strukturen geschriebener Wörter und ihre Verarbeitung beim Lesen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

Halliday, M. A. K.

[1977] (2010) Ideas about language. In Jonathan J. Webster & M. A. K. Halliday (eds.), On language and linguistics, 92–112. London & New York: Continuum.

Haspelmath, Martin

(2006) Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics 42.1: 25–70.

Hockett, Charles F.

(1951) Review of Nationalism and Language Reform in China, by J. DeFrancis. Language 27.3: 439–445.

Hurch, Bernhard

(1988) Über Aspiration: Ein Kapitel aus der natürlichen Phonologie. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.

(1998) Optimalität und Natürlichkeit. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 13: 115–139.

(2006) Natural Phonology. In E. K. Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, 541–543. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Hurch, Bernhard & Geoffrey Nathan

(1996) Naturalness in phonology. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 49.3: 231–245.

Jakobson, Roman

(1941) Kindersprache, Aphasie und allgemeine Lautgesetze. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.

Kao, Henry S. R., Gerard P. Van Galen & Rumjahn Hoosain

(eds.) (1986) Graphonomics: contemporary research in handwriting. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

Katz, Leonard & Ram Frost

(1992) The reading process is different for different orthographies: the orthographic depth hypothesis. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning, 67–84. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

Keller, Rudi

(2014) Sprachwandel: von der unsichtbaren Hand in der Sprache. 4th edition. Tübingen: Francke.

Kohrt, Manfred

(1987) Theoretische Aspekte der deutschen Orthographie. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

Kurzon, Dennis

(2008) A brief note on diacritics. Written Language and Literacy 11.1: 90–94.

Lachmann, Thomas & Thomas Geyer

(2003) Letter reversals in dyslexia: is the case really closed? A critical review and conclusions. Psychology Science 45: 50–72.

Law, Nancy, W. W. Ki, A. L. S. Chung, P. Y. Ko & H. C. Lam

(1998) Children’s stroke sequence errors in writing Chinese characters. Reading and writing 10: 267–292.

Lewis, Geoffrey

(2000) Turkish Grammar. 2nd edition. Oxford: OUP.

Luschützky, Hans C.

(2006) Ältere Entwicklungen in der natürlichen Morphologie. In Sylvain Auroux, E. F. K. Koerner, Hans-Josef Niederehe & Kees Versteegh (eds.), History of the language sciences, Vol. 3, 2340–2351. Berlin & Boston: de Gruyter.

Mattingly, Ignatius G.

(1985) Did orthographies evolve? Remedial and Special Education 6.6: 18–23.

Mayerthaler, Willi

(1981) Morphologische Natürlichkeit. Wiesbaden: Athenaion.

(1987) System-independent morphological naturalness. In Dressler, Wolfgang U., Willi Mayerthaler, Oswald Panagl & Wolfgang U. Wurzel (1987), 25–58.

Mayerthaler, Willi, Günther Fliedl & Christian Winkler

(1998) Lexikon der Natürlichkeitstheoretischen Syntax und Morphosyntax. Tübingen: Stauffenberg.

McCardle, Peggy, Brett Miller, Jun Ren Lee & Ovid J. L. Tzeng

(2011) Dyslexia across languages: orthography and the brain-gene-behavior link. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

Meletis, Dimitrios

(2015) Graphetik: Form und Materialität von Schrift. Glückstadt: Verlag Werner Hülsbusch.

Miyamoto, Tadao

(2007) The evolution of writing systems: against the Gelbian hypothesis. In Akito Sakurai, Kôiti Hasida & Katsumi Nitta (eds.), New frontiers in artificial intelligence, 345–356. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

Munske, Horst H.

(1994) Ist eine „natürliche“ Graphematik möglich? In Otmar Werner (ed.), Probleme der Graphie, 9–24. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.

Neef, Martin

(2005) Die Graphematik des Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

(2015) Writing systems as modular objects: proposals for theory design in grapholinguistics. Open Linguistics 1: 708–721.

Neef, Martin, Said Sahel & Rüdiger Weingarten

(eds.) (2012ff.) Schriftlinguistik/Grapholinguistics. Berlin & Boston: de Gruyter.

Nerius, Dieter

(ed.) (2007) Deutsche Orthographie. 4th edition. Hildesheim: Olms.

Nerius, Dieter & Gerhard Augst

(eds.) (1988) Probleme der geschriebenen Sprache. Beiträge zur Schriftlinguistik auf dem XIV. internationalen Linguistenkongreß 1987 in Berlin. Berlin: Akademie der Wissenschaften der DDR.

Olson, David R.

(1996) The world on paper: the conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. Cambridge: CUP.

Orešnik, Janez

(2004) Naturalness in (morpho)syntax: English examples. Ljubljana: Slovenska akademija znanosti in umetnosti.

Pegado, Filipe, Kimihiro Nakamura, Laurent Cohen & Stanislas Dehaene

(2011) Breaking the symmetry: mirror discrimination for single letters but not for pictures in the Visual Word Form Area. NeuroImage 55: 742–749.

Reitz, Jela

(1994) Erworbene Schriftsprachstörungen: eine neurolinguistische Aufgaben sammlung zur Erfassung schriftsprachlicher Leistungen. Opladen, Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.

Rezec, Oliver

(2009) Zur Struktur des deutschen Schriftsystems. PhD Dissertation Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München.

(2013) Ein differenzierteres Strukturmodell des deutschen Schriftsystems. Linguistische Berichte 234: 227–254.

Rogers, Henry

(1995) Optimal orthographies. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson, (eds.), Scripts and literacy: reading and learning to read alphabets, syllabaries and characters, 31–43. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

(2005) Writing systems: a linguistic approach. Malden: Blackwell.

Salomon, Richard

(2012) Some principles and patterns of script change. In Stephen D. Houston (ed.), The shape of script: how and why writing systems change, 119–133. Santa Fe: School for Advanced Research Press.

Sampson, Geoffrey

[1985] (2015) Writing systems: a linguistic introduction. 2nd edition. Bristol: Equinox.

Saniei, Andisheh

(2011) Who is an ideal native speaker?! International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research 26: 74–78.

Schmid, Stephan

(1997) The Naturalness Differential Hypothesis: cross-linguistic influence and universal preferences in interlanguage phonology and morphology. Folia Linguistica 31.3–4: 331–348.

Schreiber, Gordian

(submitted). Visual politeness: remarks on cursivization as found in pre-modern Japanese handbooks on letter writing. In The idea of writing, vol. 4. Leiden: Brill.

Sebba, Mark

(2009) Sociolinguistic approaches to writing systems research. Writing Systems Research 1.1: 35–49.

Share, David L.

(2008) On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: the perils of over-reliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychologial Bulletin 134.4: 584–616.

(2014) Alphabetism in reading science. Frontiers in psychology 5.752.

Share, David L. & Peter T. Daniels

(2016) Aksharas, alphasyllabaries, abugidas, alphabets and orthographic depth: Reflections on Rimzhim, Katz and Fowler (2014). Writing Systems Research 8.1: 17–31.

Smalley, William A.

(ed.) (1963) Orthography studies: articles on new writing systems. London: United Bible Societies.

Smith, Janet S.

(Shibamoto) (1996) Japanese Writing. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.), The world’s writing systems, 209–217. New York, Oxford: OUP.

Stampe, David

(1973) A dissertation on Natural Phonology. Bloomington: IULC.

Unseth, Peter

(2005) Sociolinguistic parallels between choosing scripts and languages. Written Language and Literacy 8.1: 19–42.

Venezky, Richard L.

(1977) Principles for the design of practical writing systems. In Joshua Fishman (ed.) (1977), 37–54.

(2004) In search of the perfect orthography. Written Language and Literacy 7.2: 139–163.

Watt, W. C.

(2015) What is the proper characterization of the alphabet? VII: Sleight of hand. Semiotica 207: 65–88.

Weingarten, Rüdiger

(2011) Comparative graphematics. Written Language and Literacy 14.1: 12–38.

Wiebelt, Alexandra

(2003) Die Entwicklung der Symmetrie in der Schrift: Wie Objektkonstanz die Genese von Buchstabenformen beeinflusst. Linguistische Berichte 195: 295–323.

(2004) Do symmetrical letter pairs affect readability? Written Language and Literacy 7.2: 275–304.

Wurzel, Wolfgang U.

(1984) Flexionsmorphologie und Natürlichkeit: Ein Beitrag zur morphologischen Theoriebildung. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.

(1987) System-dependent morphological naturalness in inflection. In Dressler, Wolfgang U., Willi Mayerthaler, Oswald Panagl & Wolfgang U. Wurzel (1987), 59–96.

(1994) Natural Morphology. In R. E. Asher (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2590–2598. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

(1997) Natürlicher Grammatischer Wandel, ‚unsichtbare Hand‘ und Sprachökonomie – Wollen wir wirklich so Grundverschiedenes? In Thomas Birkmann, Heinz Klingenberg, Damaris Nübling & Elke Ronneberger-Sibold (eds.), Vergleichende Germanische Philologie und Skandinavistik: Festschrift für Otmar Werner, 295–308. Berlin & Boston: de Gruyter.

Yan, Zhenjiang

(2002) Der geheime Phono- und Eurozentrismus des Redens von Schrift. In Erika Greber, Konrad Ehlich & Jan-Dirk Müller (eds.), Materialität und Medialität von Schrift, 151–164. Bielefeld: Aisthesis.

Zhao, Shouhui & Richard B. Baldauf Jr.

(2008) Planning Chinese characters: reaction, evolution or revolution? Dordrecht: Springer.

Cited by

Cited by other publications

Meletis, Dimitrios

2019. The grapheme as a universal basic unit of writing. Writing Systems Research 11:1 ► pp. 26 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 july 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.