Cover not available
Article published In:
Written Language & Literacy
Vol. 22:1 (2019) ► pp.95–130

Effects of non-native word shapes in the recognition and recall of medicine names

 | CBIOS – Universidade Lusófona’s Research Center for Biosciences and Health Technologies
 | Universidade NOVA de Lisboa
 | University of Lisbon
 | University of Lisbon
 | University of Lisbon
Mistakes involving medicine brand names may lead to serious medication errors and even patients’ death. We tested the effect of medicine brand names shape – native vs. non-native spelling – in two groups of Portuguese speaking subjects: (i) pharmacy clients (older and less educated); (ii) graduate students (younger and more educated). We run a recognition task and an immediate recall task, testing three groups of names with: (1) non-native graphemes, (2) non-native grapho-/phonotactics, (3) native patterns. Results showed that names with non-native properties, especially non-native graphemes, were recalled significantly worse. Non-native patterns had a null effect in the recognition task, possibly due to a facilitating effect of the odd, non-native feature, compensating for the extra demand imposed by non-native patterns on processing. Less educated, older participants consistently performed significantly worse than more educated, younger subjects across experiments. The results suggest the pertinence of adapting medicine names to the language of target users.
Keywords: non-native spelling, age and education, word recognition, word recall, medicine names, drug names
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1Effects of the shape of words in word recall and word recognition
    • 2.2Effects of education and age in memorizing words
    • 2.3Research on the adequacy of medicine brand names
    • 2.4Portuguese writing conventions
    • 2.5Research questions and hypotheses
  • 3.Experiment 1 – Recognition task
    • 3.1Method
      • 3.1.1Participants
      • 3.1.2Previous knowledge of the names by participants
      • 3.1.3Materials
      • 3.1.4Procedure
      • 3.1.5Data coding and analysis
    • 3.2Results
  • 4.Experiment 2 – Immediate recall using orthographic transcription
    • 4.1Method
      • 4.1.1Participants
      • 4.1.2Materials
      • 4.1.3Procedure
      • 4.1.4Data coding and analysis
    • 4.2Results
  • 5.General discussion
  • References
Published online: 20 November 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00021.pir
References (42)
References
Arndt, J., Lee, K. & Flora, D. (2008). Recognition without identification for words, pseudowords and nonwords. Journal of Memory and Language, 59/31, 346–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A. D., Thomson, N. & Buchanan, M. (1975). Word length and the structure of short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 141, 575–589. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ballentine, N. H. (2008). Polypharmacy in the elderly: Maximizing benefit, minimizing harm. Critical Care Nursing Quarterly, 311, 40–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhatarah, P., Ward, G., Smith, J. & Hayes, L. (2009). Examining the relationship between free recall and immediate serial recall: Similar patterns of rehearsal and similar effects of word length, presentation rate, and articulatory suppression. Memory & Cognition, 371, 689–713. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidson, L. (2006). Phonotactics and articulatory coordination interact in phonology: Evidence from nonnative production. Cognitive Science, 301, 837–862. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duarte, I. (2000). Língua Portuguesa. Instrumentos de Análise. [Portuguese Language. Instruments of Analysis]. Lisboa: Universidade Aberta.Google Scholar
Duncan, L. G., Castro, S. L., Defior, S., Seymour, P. H., Baillie, S., Leybaert, J. & Serrano, F. (2013). Phonological development in relation to native language and literacy: Variations on a theme in six alphabetic orthographies. Cognition, 1271, 398–419. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dupoux, E., Peperkamp, S. & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2001). A robust method to study stress “deafness”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1101, 1606–1618. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Federman, A. D., Sano, M., Wolf, M. S., Siu, A. L. & Halm, E. A. (2009). Health literacy and cognitive performance in older adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 571, 1475–1480. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filik, R., Purdy, K., Gale, A. & Garrett, D. (2004). Drug name confusion: Evaluating the effectiveness of capital (‘Tall Man’) letters using eye movement data. Social Science & Medicine, 591, 2597–2601. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Food and Drug Administration. (2010). Guidance for Industry contents of a Complete Submission for the Evaluation of Proprietary Names. Retrieved July 2017 from [URL]
Freitas, T., Ramilo, M. & Soalheiro, E. (2003). ‘O processo de integração dos estrangeirismos no português europeu’ [Integration process of loan words in European Portuguese], in Actas do XVIII Encontro da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística. Lisboa, APL, 371–385.Google Scholar
Georgiou, I. (2010). Seven and the sausage machine: Searching for conclusion in Miller’s 1956 magical paper. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 271, 611–621. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Handler, S. M., Nace, D. A., Studenski, S. A. & Fridsma, D. B. (2004). Medication error reporting in long-term care. The American Journal of Geriatric Pharmacotherapy, 21, 190–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haist, F., Shimamura, A. P. & Squire, L. R. (1992). On the relationship between recall and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 181, 691–702. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Infarmed, I. P. (2011). Prontuário Nacional Terapêutico – 10. [National Prescribing Guide – 10]. Lisboa: Autoridade Nacional do Medicamento e Produtos de Saúde, IP.Google Scholar
(2012). Deliberação 144/CD/2012: Norma orientadora para aceitação de nome de medicamentos. [Deliberation 144/CD/2012: Guideline for the acceptance of medicine names]. Retrieved April 2019 from [URL]
Institute of Medicine. (2007). Preventing Medication Errors. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambert, B. L., Bhaumik, R., Zhao, W. & Bhaumik, D. K. (2015). Detection and prediction limits for identifying highly confusable drug names from experimental data. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 261, no pagination specified. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambert, B. L., Chang, K. Y. & Gupta, P. (2003a). Effects of frequency and similarity neighborhoods in pharmacists’ visual perception of drug names. Social Science & Medicine, 571, 1939–1955. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambert, B. L., Chang, K. Y. & Lin, S. J. (2003b). Immediate free recall of drug names: effects of similarity and availability. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 60(2), 156–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001a). Descriptive analysis of the drug name lexicon. Drug Information Journal, 351, 163–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001b). Effect of orthographic and phonological similarity on false recognition of drug names. Social Science & Medicine, 521, 1843–1857. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003b). Immediate free recall of drug names: Effects of similarity and availability. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy 60/21, 156–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambert, B. L., Lin, S. J. & Tan, H. (2005). Designing safe drug names. Drug Safety, 281, 495–512. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martins, F., Vigário, M. & Frota, S. (2016). FreP – Frequency in Portuguese. Version V2016. Software in CD-ROM.Google Scholar
Mateus, M. H. & Andrade, E. (2000). The phonology of the Portuguese. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McHugh, M. L. (2013). The Chi-square test of independence. Biochemia medica, 231, 143–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
National Institute of Statistics. (2015). Census 2011: População residente, segundo o grupo etário, por nivel de escolaridade completo e sexo. [Resident Population according to age group, level of education and sex]. Retrieved July 2017 from [URL]
New, B., Ferrand, L., Pallier, C., & Brysbaert, M. (2006). Reexamining the word length effect in visual word recognition: New evidence from the English Lexicon Project. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 13(1), 45–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
OECD. (2016). Education at a Glance 2016: OECD indicators. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paasche-Orlow, M. K., Parker, R. M., Gazmararian, J. A., Nielsen-Bohlman, L. T. & Rudd, R. R. (2005). The prevalence of limited health literacy. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 201, 175–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pires, P., Correia, S., Costa, M., Cavaco, A. & Vigário, M. (2018). Effects of non-native spelling in the production accuracy of Portuguese medicine brand names. Book of industry papers, poster papers and abstracts of the CENTERIS 2018 – Conference on Enterprise Information Systems / ProjMAN 2018 – International Conference on Project MANagement / HCist 2018 – International Conference on Health and Social Care Information Systems and Technologies. ISBN: 978-989-97433-9-7 (conference paper).Google Scholar
Pires, C., Vigário, M. & Cavaco, A. (2015). Brand names of Portuguese medication: understanding the importance of their linguistic structure and regulatory issues. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva 20(8), 2569–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Factors influencing subjects’ comprehension of a set of medicine package inserts. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 38(4), 888–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schell, K. (2009). Using enhanced text to facilitate recognition of drug names: Evidence from two experimental studies. Applied Ergonomics, 401, 82–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. C., Monaghan, P. & Huettig, F. (2014). Literacy effects on language and vision: Emergent effects from an amodal shared resource (ASR) computational model. Cognitive Psychology, 751, 28–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soares, M. A. (2003). Avaliação da Terapêutica Potencialmente Inapropriada no Doente Geriátrico. [Evaluation of the potentially inappropriate therapy of geriatric patients]. Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved July 2017 from [URL]
Tanida, Y., Ueno, T., Lambon, R. M. A. & Saito, S. (2015). The roles of long-term phonotactic and lexical prosodic knowledge in phonological short-term memory. Memory & Cognition, 431, 500–519. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Veloso, J. (2007). ‘Rimes /VGNS/ en position finale de mot en portugais: Une contrainte «sensible au mot»’ [Rimes / VGNS / in final word position in Portuguese: A constraint «sensitive to the word»] in M. Iliescu, P. Danler and H. D. Siller-Runggaldier (Eds.), Actes du XXVe Congrès International de Linguistique et de Philologie Romanes, 231–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vigário, M., Frota, S. & Martins, F. (2010). A frequência que conta na aquisição da fonologia: types ou tokens . In Ana Maria Brito, Fátima Silva, João Veloso & Alexandra Fiéis (eds.). XXV Encontro Nacional da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística. Textos seleccionados. Porto: Associação Portuguesa de Linguística, 749–767.Google Scholar
Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research. Journal of Memory and Language, 461, 441–517. DOI logoGoogle Scholar