Cover not available
Article published In:
Written Language & Literacy
Vol. 22:1 (2019) ► pp.131–159

The development of adverbial clause functions in Hebrew narrative and expository writing across adolescence

| Tel Aviv University
| Tel Aviv University
Interclausal subordination, serving various functions in written discourse, has been studied mostly from a quantitative perspective in later language development. The current study applied a discourse-functional approach to a quantitative and qualitative examination of subordinate Adverbial Clauses (ACs) in Hebrew writing development.
Analysis targeted narrative and expository texts, written by Hebrew speaker-writers in grades 4, 7, 11, and university students. Adverbial clauses were counted, and classified according to function. In narratives, they delineated either plotline events, surrounding descriptions, or subjective interpretations. Expository ACs served to enlarge on the current argument, anchor new arguments in previous discourse, or move on, initiating a new topic.
Narrative ACs had similar prevalence across development, but shifted functionally, favoring interpretive roles in older writers. Expository ACs retained their enlarging-on and anchoring functions, while decreasing in quantity, parallel to an increase in alternative, clause-internal devices. The study underscores the usefulness of a functionally-oriented perspective in revealing developmental changes in the syntax-discourse interface.
Keywords: Hebrew, adverbial clauses, discourse functions, writing development, narrative, expository
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Adverbials
    • 1.2Adverbial Clauses in syntactic subordination
    • 1.3Discourse functions of adverbial subordination
    • 1.4Adverbial clauses in writing development
    • 1.5Aims
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1Participants and materials
    • 2.2Categories of analysis
      • AC prevalence
      • AC functions
    • 2.3Statistical analysis
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1AC prevalence
    • 3.2AC functions
      • Narrative
      • Expository
  • 4.Discussion
    • 4.1Prevalence of adverbial clauses
    • 4.2AC functions across genres in development
      • 4.2.1Narratives
        • 4.2.1.1Eventive ACs
        • 4.2.1.2Descriptive ACs
        • 4.2.1.3Interpretive ACs
      • 4.2.2Expositories
        • 4.2.2.1Moving-on ACs
        • 4.2.2.2Enlarging-on ACs
        • 4.2.2.3Anchoring ACs
    • 4.3Clause-internal alternatives to anchoring ACs: Further analyses
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 20 November 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00022.bra
References (85)
References
Aparici, Melina, Rosado, Elisa & Perera, Joan. (2016). Later development of relative clauses across discourse genres and modalities of production. In Joan Perera, Melina Aparici, Elisa Rosado & Naymé Salas (eds.), Written and spoken language development across the lifespan: Essays in honour of Liliana Tolchinsky, 201–226. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beers, Scott F. & Nagy, William E. (2011). Writing development in four genres from grades three to seven: Syntactic complexity and genre differentiation. Reading and Writing 24(2): 183–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berman, Ruth A. (1997). Narrative theory and narrative development: The Labovian impact. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 71, 235–244.Google Scholar
(ed.) (2004). Language development across childhood and adolescence. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Beyond the sentence: Language development in narrative contexts. In Edith L. Bavin (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of child language, 355–375. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berman, Ruth A. & Katzenberger, Irit. (2004). Form and function in introducing narrative and expository texts: A developmental perspective. Discourse Processes 38(1): 57–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berman, Ruth A. & Neeman, Yonni. (1994). Development of linguistic forms: Hebrew. In Ruth A. Berman & Dan I. Slobin (eds.), Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study, 285–328. New York: Psychology press.Google Scholar
Berman, Ruth A. & Nir-Sagiv, Bracha. (2007). Comparing narrative and expository text construction across adolescence: A developmental paradox. Discourse Processes 43(2): 79–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2009). Clause packaging in narratives: A crosslinguistic developmental study. In Jiansheng Guo, Elena Lieven, Nancy Budwig, Susan Ervin-Tripp, Keiko Nakamura & Şeyda Özçalışkan (eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin, 149–162. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Berman, Ruth A. & Ravid, Dorit. (2009). Becoming a literate language user. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy, 92–111. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berman, Ruth A. & Slobin, Dan I. (1994). Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Berman, Ruth A. & Verhoeven, Ludo. (2002). Developing text production abilities in speech and writing. Written Languages and Literacy 5(1): 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas. (2006). Stance in spoken and written university registers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5(2): 97–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2011). Speech and writing: Linguistic styles enabled by the technology of literacy. In Gisle Andersen & Karin Aijmer (eds.), Pragmatics of society, 137–152. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Gray, Bethany & Poonpon, Kornwipa. (2011). Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly 45(1): 5–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Brandes, Gilad & Ravid, Dorit. (2017). A developmental study of prepositional phrases in Hebrew written text construction. First Language 37(1): 83–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Britton, Bruce K. (1994). Understanding expository texts: Building mental structures to induce insights. In Morton A. Gernsbacher (ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics, 641–674. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. (1984). How people use adverbial clauses. Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 437–449. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace & Danielwicz, J. (1987). Properties of spoken and written language. In Rosalind Horowitz & Jay S. Samuels (eds.), Comprehending oral and written language, 83–113. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Christie, Frances & Derewianka, Beverly. (2008). School discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia. (1998). Deranking and balancing in different subordination relations: A typological study. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 51(1): 3–42.Google Scholar
Davison, Alice. (1979). Some mysteries of subordination. Studies in Linguistic Sciences 9(1): 105–128.Google Scholar
Diessel, Holgar. (2001). The ordering distribution of main and adverbial clauses: A typological study. Language 77(3): 433–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2005). Competing motivations for the ordering of main and adverbial clauses. Linguistics 43(3): 449–470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E. (1993). Grammar in interaction: Adverbial clauses in American English conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox, Barbara A. & Thompson, Sandra A. (1990). A discourse explanation of the grammar of relative clauses in English conversation. Language 66(2): 297–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, Rachel. (1985). A text-based analysis of non-narrative texts. Theoretical Linguistics 12(2–3): 115–135.Google Scholar
. (1988). On the informativeness requirement. Journal of Pragmatics 12(5): 547–565. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy. (1993). English grammar: A function-based introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
. (2001). Syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Glinert, Lewis. (1989). The grammar of modern Hebrew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. (1993). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education 5(2): 93–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Aspects of language and learning. Heidelberg: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. (1999). Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hardin, James W. & Hilbe, Joseph M. (2013). Generalized estimating equations (2nd ed). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.Google Scholar
Hunt, Kellogg W. (1965). Grammatical structures written at three grade levels. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
(1966). Sentence structures used by superior students in grades four and twelve, and by superior adults. Tallahassee, Florida: Florida State University.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken & Tse, Polly. (2005). Hooking the reader: A corpus study of evaluative that in abstracts. English for Specific Purposes 24(2): 123–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kellogg, Ronald T. (2008). Training writing skills: A cognitive developmental perspective. Journal of Writing Research 1(1): 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kerz, Elma & Wiechmann, Daniel. (2015). Register-contingent entrenchment of constructional patterns: Causal and concessive adverbial clauses in academic and newspaper writing. Journal of English Linguistics 43(1): 61–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
König, Ekkehard & van der Auwera, Johan. (1988). Clause integration in German and Dutch conditionals, concessive conditionals, and concessives. In John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse, 101–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. (1972). Language in the inner city: Studies in the black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William & Waletzky, Joshua. (1967). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In June Helm (ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts, 12–44. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. (2014). Subordination in a dynamic account of grammar: Cognitive, typological and discourse perspectives. In Laura Visapää, Jyrki Kalliokoski & Helena Sorva (eds.), Contexts of subordination, 17–72. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. (1988). Towards a typology of clause linkage. In John Haiman & Sandra J. Thompson (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse, 181–225. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Longacre, Robert E. (1996). The grammar of discourse (2nd ed.). London: Plenum Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). Sentences as combinations of clauses. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 372–420. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R. & White, Peter R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmilan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. (2002). Combining clauses into clause complexes: A multi-faceted view. In Joan Bybee & Michael Noonan (eds.), Complex sentences in grammar and discourse: Essays in honor of Sandra A. Thompson, 235–320. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Register in the round: Registerial cartography. Functional Linguistics 2(1): 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. & Thompson, Sandra A. (1988). The structure of discourse and ‘subordination’. In John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse, 275–330. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myhill, Debra. (2008). Towards a linguistic model of sentence development in writing. Language and Education 22(5): 271–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nippold, Marilyn A. (2007). Later language development: School age children, adolescents and young adults (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
Nippold, Marilyn A., Ward-Lonergan, Jeannene M. & Fanning, Jessica L. (2005). Persuasive writing in children, adolescents, and adults: A study of syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic development. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 36(2): 125–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nir, Bracha & Berman, Ruth A. (2010a). Parts of speech as constructions: The case of Hebrew “adverbs”. Constructions and Frames 2(2): 242–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010b). Complex syntax as a window on contrastive rhetoric. Journal of Pragmatics 42(3): 744–765. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olson, David R. (2006). Oral discourse in a world of literacy. Research in the Teaching of English 41(2): 136–143.Google Scholar
Perera, Katharine. (1984). Children’s writing and reading: Analysing classroom language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Prideaux, Gary D. & Hogan, John T. (1993). Markedness as a discourse management device: The role of alternative adverbial clause orders. Word 44(3): 397–411. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Puranik, Cynthia S., Lombardino, Linda J. & Altmann, Lori J. P. (2008). Assessing the microstructure of written language using a retelling paradigm. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 17(2), 107–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ravid, Dorit & Berman, Ruth A. (2006). Information density in the development of spoken and written narratives in English and Hebrew. Discourse Processes 41(2): 117–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). Developing noun phrase complexity at school age: A text-embedded cross-linguistic analysis. First Language 30(1): 3–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ravid, Dorit & Cahana-Amitay, Dalia. (2005). Verbal and nominal expressions in narrating conflict situations in Hebrew. Journal of Pragmatics 37(2): 157–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ravid, Dorit & Chen-Djemal, Yehudit. (2015). Spoken and written narration in Hebrew: A case study. Written Language and Literacy 18(1): 56–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ravid, Dorit & Shlesinger, Yitzhak. (2000). Modern Hebrew adverbials: Between syntactic class and lexical category. In Ellen Contini-Morava & Yishai Tobin (eds.), Between grammar and lexicon, 333–352. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ravid, Dorit & Tolchinsky, Liliana. (2002). Developing linguistic literacy: A comprehensive model. Journal of Child Language 29(2): 417–447. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ravid, Dorit & Vered, Lizzy. (2017). Hebrew verbal passives in later language development: The interface of register and verb morphology. Journal of Child Language 44(6): 1309–1336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. (1984). Principles of gestalt perception in the temporal organization of narrative texts. Linguistics 22(6): 779–809.Google Scholar
Rimmer, Wayne. (2008). Putting grammatical complexity in context. Literacy 42(1): 29–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schachter, Paul & Shopen, Timothy. (2007). Parts of speech systems. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 1–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schleppegrell, Mary J. (2001). Linguistic features of the language of schooling. Linguistics and Education 12(4): 431–459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schleppergrell, Mary J. (1992). Subordination and linguistic complexity. Discourse Processes 15(1): 117–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stede, Manfred. (2008). RST revisited: Disentangling nuclearity. In Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen & Wiebke Ramm (eds.), ‘Subordination’ versus ‘coordination’ in sentence and text: A cross-linguistic perspective, 33–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannenbaum, Michal, Abugov, Neta & Ravid, Dorit. (2006). Hebrew-language narratives of Yiddish-speaking ultra-orthodox girls in Israel. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 27(6): 472–490. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. (1985). Grammar and written discourse: Initial vs. final purpose clauses in English. Text 5(1–2): 55–84.Google Scholar
(1987). ‘Subordination’ and narrative event structure. In Russel S. Tomlin (ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse, 435–454. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., Longacre, Robert E. & Hwang, Shin Ja J. (2007). Adverbial clauses. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 237–300. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomlin, Russel S. (1985). Foreground-background information and the syntax of subordination. Text 5(1–2): 85–122.Google Scholar
Ungerer, Friedrich. (1998). The choice between adverbs and adverbial phrases. In Rainer Schulze (ed.), Making meaningful choices in English: On dimensions, perspectives, methodology and evidence, 259–275. Tübingen, Germany: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, Ludo, Aparici, Melina, Cahana-Amitay, Dalia, van Hell, Janet G., Kriz, Sarah & Viguié-Simon, Anne. (2002). Clause packaging in writing and speech: A cross-linguistic developmental analysis. Written Language and Literacy 5(2): 135–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe. (2002). The functional value of non-integration in clause combining: Interpersonal versus discursive independence. Word, 53(1): 37–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2007). Rethinking the coordinate-subordinate dichotomy: Interpersonal grammar and the analysis of adverbial clauses in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar