Article published in:
Written Language & Literacy
Vol. 24:1 (2021) ► pp. 137
References

References

Androutsopoulos, J.
(2011) Language change and digital media: a review of conceptions and evidence. In T. Kristiansen & N. Coupland (Eds.), Standard languages and language standards in a changing Europe (pp. 145–161). Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H.
(2014) Multivariate Statistics. In R. Podesva, & D. Sharma (Eds.), Research Methods in Linguistics (pp. 337–372). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R. & Gulikers, L.
(1995) The CELEX Lexical Database (Release 2) [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
(2015) Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67: 1–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bosman, A. M. T.
(2005) Development of rule-based verb spelling in Dutch students. Written Language & Literacy 8: 1–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chamalaun, R., Bosman, A., & Ernestus, M.
(2021) The Role of Grammar in Spelling Homophonous Regular Verbs. Written Language & Literacy. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coates, J.
(1993) Woman, men and language. A sociolinguistic account of sex differences in language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Cumming, G.
(2012) Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. Routledge / Taylor & Francis Group. differences in language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ernestus, M., & Mak, W. M.
(2005) Analogical effects in reading Dutch verb forms. Memory & Cognition 33: 1160–1173. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Falkauskas, K., & Kuperman, V.
(2015) When experience meets language statistics: Individual variability in processing English compound words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 41: 1607.Google Scholar
[ p. 35 ]
Fox, J., & Monette, G.
(1992) Generalized collinearity diagnostics. JASA, 87: 178–183. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frisson, S., & Sandra, D.
(2002) Homophonic Forms of Regularly Inflected Verbs Have Their Own Orthographic Representations: A Developmental Perspective on Spelling Errors. Brain and Language 81: 545–554. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gahl, S., & Plag, I.
(2019) Spelling errors in English derivational suffixes reflect morphological boundary strength: A case study. The Mental Lexicon 14: 1–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L.
(2010) Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th ed. New York: Pearson.Google Scholar
Hastie, T. J., Tibshirani, R., & Tibshirani, R. J.
(2017) Extended Comparisons of Best Subset Selection, Forward Stepwise Selection, and the Lasso.Google Scholar
Hilte, L.
(2019) The social in social media writing: The impact of age, gender and social class indicators on adolescents’ informal online writing practices. Antwerp: University of Antwerp (doctoral thesis).Google Scholar
Hilte, L., Daelemans, W., & Vandekerckhove, R.
(2020a) Lexical patterns in adolescents’ online writing: The impact of age, gender, and education. Written Communication 37: 365–400. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hilte, L., Vandekerckhove, R., & Daelemans, W.
(2018) Adolescents’ social background and non-standard writing in online communication. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 7: 2–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hilte, L., Vandekerckhove, R. & Daelemans, W.
(2020b) Modeling adolescents’ online practices: The sociolectometry of non-standard writing on social media. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 87: 173–201. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J.
(1992) An introduction to sociolinguistics. London / New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Keuleers, E., Brysbaert, M., & New, B.
(2010) SUBTLEX-NL: A new frequency measure for Dutch words based on film subtitles. Behavior Research Methods 42: 643–650. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuperman, V., et al.
(2021) Prevalence of spelling errors affect reading behavior across languages. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 1–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W.
(2001) Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol. 2: Social Factors. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Ouellette, G., Martin-Chang, S., & Rossi, M.
(2017) Learning from our mistakes: Improvements in spelling lead to gains in reading speed. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21: 350–357. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A.
(2007) Reading Ability: Lexical Quality to Comprehension. Scientific studies of reading 11: 357–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L.
(2002) The lexical quality hypothesis. Precursors of functional literacy 11: 67–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
(2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Rahmanian, S., & Kuperman, V.
(2019) Spelling errors impede recognition of correctly spelled word forms. Scientific Studies of Reading 23: 24–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, M., Martin-Chang, S., & Ouellette, G.
(2019) Exploring the space between good and poor spelling: Orthographic quality and reading speed. Scientific Studies of Reading 23: 192–201. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 36 ]
Sandra, D.
(2010) Homophone Dominance at the Whole-word and Sub-word Levels: Spelling Errors Suggest Full-form Storage of Regularly Inflected Verb Forms. Language and Speech 53: 405–444. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sandra, D., & Van Abbenyen, L.
(2009) Frequency and analogical effects in the spelling of full-form and sublexical homophonous patterns by 12 year-old children. The Mental Lexicon 4: 239–275. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sandra, D., Frisson, S., & Daems, F.
(1999) Why simple verb forms can be so difficult to spell: the influence of homophone frequency and distance in Dutch. Brain and Language 68: 277–283. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmitz, T., Chamalaun, R., & Ernestus, M.
(2018) The Dutch verb-spelling paradox in social media. A corpus study. Linguistics in the Netherlands, 111–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H.
(1997) How Complex Simplex Words can be. Journal of Memory and Language 37: 118–139. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Surkyn, H., Vandekerckhove, R., & Sandra, D.
(2019) Errors Outside the Lab: The Interaction of a Psycholinguistic and a Sociolinguistic Variable in the Production of Verb Spelling Errors in Informal Computer-Mediated Communication. In J. Longhi & C. Marinica (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Conference on CMC and Social Media Corpora for the Humanities (CMC-Corpora2019) (pp. 59–62). Paris.Google Scholar
(2020) From experiment to real-life data: social factors determine the rate of spelling errors on rule-governed verb homophones but not the size of the homophone dominance effect. The Mental Lexicon 15: 422–463. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, S.
(2011) Variationist Sociolinguistics: Change, observation, interpretation. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2016) Teen talk: The language of adolescents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van den Bergh, H. & van Es, A., & Spijker, S.
(2011) Spelling op verschillendeniveaus: werkwoordspelling aan het einde van de basisschool en het einde van het voorgezet onderwijs. [Spelling at different levels: verb spelling at the end of primary school and at the end of secondary education]. Levende Talen Tijdschrift 12: 3–14.Google Scholar
Van der Horst, M., van den Bergh, H., & Evers-Vermeul, J.
(2012) Kunnen leerlingen wat ze moeten kunnen? Onderzoek naar de doorlopende leerlijn op het gebied van werkwoordspelling. [Can students do what they need to be able to do? Research into the continuous learning line in the field of verb spelling]. Levende Talen Tijdschrift 2: 33–42.Google Scholar
Vandekerckhove, R., & Nobels, J.
(2010) Code eclecticism: linguistic variation and code alternation in the chat language of Flemish teenagers. Journal of sociolinguistics 14: 657–677. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verhaert, N., & Sandra, D.
(2016) Homofoondominantie veroorzaakt dt-fouten tijdens het spellen en maakt er ons blind voor tijdens het lezen. [Homophone dominance causes dt-errors during spelling and makes us blind to them while reading]. Levende Talen Tijdschrift 17: 37–46.Google Scholar
Verhaert, N., Danckaert, E., & Sandra, D.
(2016) The dual role of homophone dominance. Why homophone intrusions on regular verb forms so often go unnoticed. The Mental Lexicon 11: 1–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 37 ]
VVKSO
(2006) Leerplan Nederlands secundair onderwijs bso. [Curriculum Dutch secondary education bso]. Brussel: Vlaams Verbond van het Katholiek Secundair Onderwijs. Retrieved from: http://​ond​.vvkso​-ict​.com​/leerplannen​/doc​/Nederlands​-2006​-020​.pdf
(2014) Leerplan Nederlands secundair onderwijs aso-kso-tso. [Curriculum Dutch secondary education aso-kso-tso]. Brussel: Vlaams Verbond van het Katholiek Secundair Onderwijs. Retrieved from: http://​ond​.vvkso​-ict​.com​/leerplannen​/doc​/Nederlands​-2014​-001​.pdf
Zipf, G. K.
(1949) Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort. An Introduction to Human Ecology. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley Press.Google Scholar