Article published in:
Written Language & Literacy
Vol. 24:1 (2021) ► pp. 3880
References

[ p. 71 ]References

Assink, E. M. H.
(1985) Assessing spelling strategies for the orthography of Dutch verbs. British Journal of Psychology, 76(3), 353–363. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L.
(1995) The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
Bosman, A. M. T.
(2005) Development of rule-based verb spelling in Dutch students. Written Language & Literacy, 8(1), 1–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Browne Rego, L. L. & Bryant, P. E.
(1993) The Connection Between Phonological, Syntactic and Semantic Skills and Children’s Reading and Spelling. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 8(3), 235–246. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Casteren, M. & Davis, M. H.
(2006) Mix, a program for pseudorandomization. Behavior Research Methods, 38(4), 584–589. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ernestus, M. & Baayen, R. H.
(2004) Analogical effects in regular past tense production in Dutch. Linguistics, 42(5), 873–903. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ernestus, M. & Mak, W. M.
(2005) Analogical effects in reading Dutch verb forms. Memory & Cognition, 33(7), 1160–1173. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frisson, S. & Sandra, D.
(2002) Homophonic forms of regularly inflected verbs have their own orthographic representations: A developmental perspective on spelling errors. Brain and Language, 81(1–3), 545–554. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Heuven, V.
(1978) Spelling en lezen. Hoe tragisch zijn de werkwoordsvormen? [Spelling and reading: How tragic are the verbs?]. Assen, the Netherlands: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Juul, H. & Elbro, C.
(2004) The links between grammar and spelling: A cognitive hurdle in deep orthographies? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(9), 915–942. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Juul, H.
(2005) Grammatical awareness and the spelling of inflectional morphemes in Danish. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 87–112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keuleers, E., Brysbaert, M., & New, B.
(2010) SUBTLEX-NL: A new frequency measure for Dutch words based on film subtitles. Behavior Research Methods, 42(3), 643–650. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
(2018) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from https://​www​.R​-project​.org/
Read, D.
(1986) Children’s Creative Spelling. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Sandra, D.
(2003) Homophonous regular verb forms with a morphographic spelling: Spelling errors as a window on the mental lexicon and working memory. In D. Sandra & E. M. H. Assink (Eds.), Reading complex words (pp. 315–329). New York: Springer Science. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Homophone dominance at the whole-word and sub-word levels: spelling errors suggest full-form storage of regularly inflected verb forms. Language and Speech, 53(3), 405–444. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sandra, D. & Fayol, M.
(2003) Spelling errors with a view on the mental lexicon: Frequency and proximity effects in misspelling homophonous regular verb forms in Dutch and French. In R. H. Baayen & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Morphological structure in language processing (pp. 485–514). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 72 ]
Sandra, D. & van Abbenyen, L.
(2009) Frequency and analogical effects in the spelling of full-form and sublexical homophonous patterns by 12 year-old children. The Mental Lexicon, 4(2), 239–275. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sandra, D., Frisson, S., & Daems, F.
(1999) Why simple verb forms can be so difficult to spell: The influence of homophone frequency and distance in Dutch. Brain and Language, 68(1–2), 277–283. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Still errors after all those years… Limited attentional resources and homophone frequency account for spelling errors on silent verb suffixes in Dutch. Written Language and Literacy, 7(1), 61–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmitz, T. P. A., Chamalaun, R. J. P. M., & Ernestus, M. T. C.
(2018) The Dutch verb-spelling paradox in social media: A corpus study. Linguistics in the Netherlands, 35(1), 111–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Surkyn, H., Vandekerckhove, R., & Sandra, D.
2020). The homophone dominance effect in real life data. The Mental Lexicon, 15(3). Crossref
van der Velde, I.
(1956) De tragedie der werkwoordsvormen. Een taalhistorische en taaldidactische studie. [The tragedy of verbs. A linguistic-historical and linguistic-didactic study]. Groningen, the Netherlands: Wolters-Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Verhaert, N., Danckaert, E., & Sandra, D.
(2016) The dual role of homophone dominance: Why homophone intrusions on regular verb forms so often go unnoticed. The Mental Lexicon, 11(1), 1–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar