Cover not available
Article published In:
On the Systematic Nature of Writing Systems
Edited by David F. Mora-Marín and Lynne Cahill
[Written Language & Literacy 26:1] 2023
► pp. 5–29

A proposal for a formalized, expandable approach to the taxonomy of writing systems

| Ruhr University Bochum
| Ruhr University Bochum

In this paper we propose a formalized and expandable approach to the taxonomy of writing systems. Taking the mixed nature of writing systems fully into account, our approach focuses on the classification of functionally homogenous subsystems, which together and in interaction with each other constitute an overall writing system. Such subsystems make use of a script or a subset of a script, which is understood here as an inventory of graphs that is (conventionally considered to be) graphically homogeneous. A basic distinction is made into phonographic and morphographic systems, but complemented by an in principle open number of subtypes, building and expanding on Gnanadesikan (2017) and Poser (1992, 2004) for segmental and syllabic systems respectively. Types are designated by a notation that employs a set of symbols, relating to both form (boundedness of graphs and their organization into segmental spaces) and function (mapping type), but by separate means.

Keywords: taxonomy of writing systems, phonography, segmentary, syllabary, morphography
Article outline
  • 1.Issues in current taxonomies
  • 2.A new proposal
  • 3.Phonographic systems
    • 3.1Segmental systems
    • 3.2Syllabic systems
    • 3.3Mixed systems with so-called ‘inherent’ vowels/consonants
  • 4.Morphographic systems
  • 5.Subsystems and their combinatorics
  • 6.Outlook
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 25 April 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00071.ost
References (39)
Bennett, Emmett L.
(1996) Aegean Scripts. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.), The World’s Writing Systems, 125–133. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bright, William
(1999) A Matter of Typology: Alphasyllabaries and Abugidas. Written Language & Literacy 2.1: 45–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buckley, Eugene
(2018) Core syllables vs. moraic writing. Written Language & Literacy 21.1: 26–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coblin, W. South
(2007) A Handbook of ’Phags-pa Chinese. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
Coulmas, Florian
(1996) The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Writing Systems. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2003) Writing Systems. An Introduction to their Linguistic Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Daniels, Peter T.
(1990) Fundamentals of Grammatology. Journal of the American Oriental Society 110.4: 727–731. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1992) The syllabic origin of writing and the segmental origin of the alphabet. In Pamela A. Downing, Susan D. Lima & Michael Noonan (eds.), The Linguistics of Literacy, 83–110. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996) The Study of Writing Systems. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.), The World’s Writing Systems, 3–17. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2009) Two notes on terminology. Written Language & Literacy 12.2: 277–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daniels, Peter T. & William Bright
(eds.) (1996) The World’s Writing Systems. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
DeFrancis, John
(1989) Visible Speech. The Diverse Oneness of Writing Systems. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faber, Alice
(1992) Phonemic segmentation as epiphenomenon. Evidence from the history of alphabetic writing. In Pamela A. Downing, Susan D. Lima & Michael Noonan (eds.), The Linguistics of Literacy, 111–134. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gelb, I. J.
(1963) A Study of Writing. Revised Edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gnanadesikan, Amalia E.
(2017) Towards a Typology of Phonemic Scripts. Writing Systems Research 9.1: 14–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021) Brahmi’s children: Variation and stability in a script family. Written Language & Literacy 24.2: 303–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gronemeyer, Sven
(2014) The Orthographic Conventions of Maya Hieroglyphic Writing: Being a Contribution to the Phonemic Reconstruction of Classic Mayan. PhD Dissertation, La Trobe University.
Joyce, Terry
(2016) Writing systems and scripts. In Andrea Rocci & Louis de Saussure (eds.), Verbal communication, 287–308. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Justeson, John S. & Laurence D. Stephens
(1994) The evolution of syllabaries from alphabets: Transmission, language contrast, and script typology. Die Sprache 35.1: 2–46.Google Scholar
Kuipers, Joel C. & Ray McDermott
(1996) Insular Southeast Asian Scripts. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.), The World’s Writing Systems, 474–484. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lu Zhuangzhang
(1892) Yimu liaoran chujie. (Reprint, Beijing: Wenzi gaige chubanshe 1956.)Google Scholar
Meletis, Dimitrios
(2019) The grapheme as a universal basic unit of writing. Writing Systems Research 11.1: 26–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020) The Nature of Writing: A Theory of Grapholinguistics. Brest: Fluxus Editions. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nam, Pung-hyun
(2012) Old Korean. In Nicolas Tranter (ed.), The Languages of Japan and Korea, 41–72. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Osterkamp, Sven & Gordian Schreiber
(2021a) Challenging the Dichotomy Between Phonography and Morphography: Transitions and Gray Areas. In Yannis Haralambous (ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st Century […] 2020, Proceedings, Part I, 47–82. Brest: Fluxus Editions. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021b) 〈Th〉e Ubi〈qu〉ity of Polygra〈ph〉y and its Significan〈ce〉 for 〈th〉e Typology of 〈Wr〉iti〈ng〉 Systems. Written Language & Literacy 24.2: 171–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Payne, Annick
(2010) Hieroglyphic Luwian. An Introduction with Original Texts. 2nd Revised Edition. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Poser, William J.
(1992) The Structural Typology of Phonological Writing. Handout (Linguistic Society of America, Philadelphia, 12 Jan 1992).Google Scholar
(2004) Phonological Writing and Phonological Representation. Handout (Harvard University, 10 Dec 2004).Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, Robert R.
(2001) What do “phonemic” writing systems represent? Arabic huruuf, Japanese kana, and the Moraic Principle. Written Language & Literacy 4.1: 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Henry
(1995) Optimal Orthographies. In Insup Taylor & David R. Olson (eds.), Scripts and Literacy. Reading and Learning to Read Alphabets, Syllabaries and Characters, 31–43. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) Writing Systems. A Linguistic Approach. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey
(1985) Writing Systems. A Linguistic Introduction. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Schreiber, Gordian
(2022) Japanese Morphography. Deconstructing hentai kanbun. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Share, David L. & Peter T. Daniels
(2015) Aksharas, alphasyllabaries, abugidas, alphabets and orthographic depth: Reflections on Rimzhim, Katz and Fowler (2014). Writing Systems Research 8.1: 17–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sproat, Richard
(2000) A Computational Theory of Writing Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Swank, Heidi
(2008) It all hinges on the vowels. Reconsidering the Alphasyllabary Classification. Written Language & Literacy 11.1: 73–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Kuijp, Leonard W. J.
(1996) The Tibetan Script and Derivatives. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.), The World’s Writing Systems, 431–441. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whittaker, Gordon
(2011) Writing Systems. In Patrick Colm Hogan (ed.), The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the Language Sciences, 935–939. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar