Article published In:
Typology of writing systemsEdited by S. Borgwaldt and Terry Joyce
[Written Language & Literacy 14:1] 2011
► pp. 39–57
Edited by S. Borgwaldt and Terry Joyce
[Written Language & Literacy 14:1] 2011
► pp. 39–57
Similarities among the shapes of writing and their effects on learning
Writing systems are usually studied in terms of the level of language that they represent, with little attention to the shapes that are used to do so. Those shapes are not random or accidental, however. They tend to be similar to one another within a script. Many of the Latin letters have a roughly vertical stem or hasta with an appendage or coda to the right. This arrangement is more common than one with the coda on the left of the hasta. We present data to show that young children are generally better at copying and writing from memory shapes such as <b> and <F>, which have the typical arrangement with the coda on the right, than those such as <d> and <J>, which do not. The results suggest that children start to learn about the statistics of the letter shapes before they know how or that these shapes represent language. Keywords: letter shapes; letters; statistical learning; Latin alphabet; reversal; left-right orientation; directionality; hasta-coda-structure
Cited by
Cited by 41 other publications
Aram, Dorit, Hadar Hazan & Michal Zohar
2023. Characteristics of preschoolers' early spelling in Hebrew. Reading and Writing 36:3 ► pp. 491 ff. 
Chang, Li-Yun, Yen-Chi Chen & Charles A. Perfetti
2018. GraphCom: A multidimensional measure of graphic complexity applied to 131 written languages. Behavior Research Methods 50:1 ► pp. 427 ff.
Chang, Li-Yun, David C. Plaut & Charles A. Perfetti
2016. Visual complexity in orthographic learning: Modeling learning across writing system variations. Scientific Studies of Reading 20:1 ► pp. 64 ff.
Elimelech, Adi & Dorit Aram
2022. Evaluating preschoolers’ references to characteristics of the Hebrew orthography via a computerized early spelling
game. Written Language & Literacy 25:2 ► pp. 159 ff.
Erlikhman, Gennady, Lars Strother, Iskra Barzakov & Gideon Caplovitz
2017. On the Legibility of Mirror-Reflected and Rotated Text. Symmetry 9:3 ► pp. 28 ff.
Fears, Nicholas E. & Jeffrey J. Lockman
2020. Case- and form-sensitive letter frequencies in children’s picture books. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 53 ► pp. 370 ff.
Fernandes, Tânia, Isabel Leite & Régine Kolinsky
2016. Into the Looking Glass: Literacy Acquisition and Mirror Invariance in Preschool and First‐Grade Children. Child Development 87:6 ► pp. 2008 ff.
Fischer, Jean-Paul
2013. Digit reversal in children’s writing: A simple theory and its empirical validation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 115:2 ► pp. 356 ff.
Fischer, Jean-Paul
2017. Character reversal in children: the prominent role of writing direction. Reading and Writing 30:3 ► pp. 523 ff.
Fischer, Jean-Paul
2018. Studies on the written characters orientation and its influence on digit reversal by children. Educational Psychology 38:5 ► pp. 556 ff.
Fischer, Jean-Paul
2023. L’écriture en miroir des enfants : 150 ans de recherches. Bulletin de psychologie N° 582:4 ► pp. 331 ff.
Fischer, Jean-Paul
2030. L’écriture en miroir des enfants : 150 ans de recherches. Bulletin de psychologie Pub. anticipées:PR1 ► pp. 1f ff.
Fischer, Jean-Paul & Anne-Marie Koch
2016. Mirror writing in typically developing children: A first longitudinal study. Cognitive Development 38 ► pp. 114 ff.
Fischer, Jean-Paul & Anne-Marie Koch
2016. Mirror writing in 5- to 6-year-old children: The preferred hand is not the explanation. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition 21:1 ► pp. 34 ff.
Fischer, Jean-Paul & Christophe Luxembourger
2018. A Synoptic and Theoretical Account of Character (Digits and Capital Letters) Reversal in Writings by Typically Developing Children. Education Sciences 8:3 ► pp. 137 ff.
Fischer, Jean-Paul & Christophe Luxembourger
2020. The Battle between the Correct and Mirror Writings of a Digit in Children’s Recognition Memory. Education Sciences 10:7 ► pp. 183 ff.
Fischer, Jean-Paul & Christophe Luxembourger
2021. A Test of Three Models of Character Reversal in Typically Developing Children’s Writing. Frontiers in Communication 6
Fischer, Jean-Paul & Christophe Luxembourger
2022. Typical 6-year-old children’s confusion between “b” and “d” in reading cannot be assimilated to reversal. Reading and Writing 35:10 ► pp. 2433 ff.
Fischer, Jean-Paul & Xavier Thierry
2021. Miswriting (Especially Mirror Writing) of the Digits: An Ecological Assessment Using ELFE Data. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology 20:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Hemelstrand, Shawn, Brian W. L. Wong, Catherine McBride, Urs Maurer & Tomohiro Inoue
2024. The Impact of Character Complexity on Chinese Literacy: A Generalized Additive Modeling Approach. Scientific Studies of Reading 28:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
HUANG, FRANCIS L. & MARCIA A. INVERNIZZI
2014. Factors associated with lowercase alphabet naming in kindergarteners. Applied Psycholinguistics 35:6 ► pp. 943 ff.
Jee, Hana, Monica Tamariz & Richard Shillcock
2022. Systematicity in language and the fast and slow creation of writing systems: Understanding two types of non-arbitrary relations between orthographic characters and their canonical pronunciation. Cognition 226 ► pp. 105197 ff.
Kozbelt, Aaron
2020. Evolutionary Constraints on Creativity in the Visual and Plastic Arts. In Evolutionary Perspectives on Imaginative Culture, ► pp. 213 ff.
Kozbelt, Aaron
2022. The Future of the Fine Arts. In Creative Provocations: Speculations on the Future of Creativity, Technology & Learning [Creativity Theory and Action in Education, 7], ► pp. 97 ff.
Larsen, Linda, Stefan Kilian Schauber, Saskia Kohnen, Lyndsey Nickels & Genevieve McArthur
2020. Children’s knowledge of single- and multiple-letter grapheme-phoneme correspondences: An exploratory study. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 51 ► pp. 379 ff.
McIntosh, Robert D., Eilidh L. Anderson & Rowena M. Henderson
2018. Experimental confirmation of a character-facing bias in literacy development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 170 ► pp. 207 ff.
McIntosh, Robert D., Keira Hillary, Ailbhe Brennan & Magdalena Lechowicz
2018. Developmental mirror-writing is paralleled by orientation recognition errors. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition 23:6 ► pp. 664 ff.
Miton, Helena & Olivier Morin
2021. Graphic complexity in writing systems. Cognition 214 ► pp. 104771 ff.
Nag, Sonali, Margaret Snowling, Philip Quinlan & Charles Hulme
2014. Child and Symbol Factors in Learning to Read a Visually Complex Writing System. Scientific Studies of Reading 18:5 ► pp. 309 ff.
Portex, Marine, Carolane Hélin, Corinne Ponce & Jean-Noël Foulin
2018. Dynamics of mirror writing compared to conventional writing in typical preliterate children. Reading and Writing 31:6 ► pp. 1435 ff.
Puranik, Cynthia S., Yaacov Petscher & Christopher J. Lonigan
2014. Learning to write letters: Examination of student and letter factors. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 128 ► pp. 152 ff.
Pérez-Rodríguez, José Henrique
2016. El lexicón como origen del carácter dinámico de los sistemas de escritura. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 68 ► pp. 192 ff.
Soares, Ana Paula, Alexandrina Lages, Helena Oliveira & Juan Hernández
2019. The mirror reflects more for d than for b: Right asymmetry bias on the visual recognition of words containing reversal letters. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 182 ► pp. 18 ff.
Soares, Ana Paula, Alexandrina Lages, Mariana Velho, Helena M. Oliveira & Juan Hernández-Cabrera
2021. The mirror reflects more for genial than for casual: right-asymmetry bias on the visual word recognition of words containing non-reversal letters. Reading and Writing 34:6 ► pp. 1467 ff.
Taha, Haitham
2023. Differences in Detecting Statistical Visual Regularities between Typical and Poor Readers. Reading Psychology 44:6 ► pp. 604 ff.
Taha, Haitham & Hala Khateeb
2018. Statistical learning and orthographic preferences among native Arab kindergarten and first graders. Writing Systems Research 10:1 ► pp. 15 ff.
Taha, Haitham & Hanada Taha
2019. Morpho-orthographic preferences among typical and poor native Arab readers. Writing Systems Research 11:2 ► pp. 212 ff.
Treiman, Rebecca, Jessica Gordon, Richard Boada, Robin L. Peterson & Bruce F. Pennington
2014. Statistical Learning, Letter Reversals, and Reading. Scientific Studies of Reading 18:6 ► pp. 383 ff.
Treiman, Rebecca, Brett Kessler & Tatiana Cury Pollo
2022. Prephonological spelling and its connections with later word reading and spelling performance. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 218 ► pp. 105359 ff.
Yin, Li & Catherine McBride
2023. A longitudinal study on sensitivity to symmetry in writing and associations with early literacy abilities. Frontiers in Education 8
Yin, Li & Rebecca Treiman
2013. Name writing in Mandarin-speaking children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 116:2 ► pp. 199 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.