Cover not available
Article published In:
Written Language & Literacy
Vol. 18:1 (2015) ► pp.121–152

Implicit and explicit instruction

The case of spelling acquisition

This study examined the influence of implicit and explicit instruction for the acquisition of two types of Dutch spelling rules: a morphological and a phonological rule. A sample of 193 first grade, low- and high skilled spellers was assigned to an implicit-instruction, explicit-instruction, or control-group condition. The results showed that for both rules, students in the explicit condition made more progress than students in the control condition. For the morphological rule, students in the explicit condition had higher posttest scores on pseudo-words than students in the implicit condition. The effects of the three conditions were the same for low- and high-skilled spellers. Both low- and high-skilled spellers in the implicit and explicit condition did not fully generalize their knowledge of both rules to new and pseudo-words.

Keywords: explicit instruction, implicit instruction, spelling instruction, spelling, Dutch, spelling level
Published online: 12 February 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.18.1.06cor
References
Booij, Geert E., Camiel Hamans, Gerard Verhoeven, Frida Balk & Charlotte H. van Minnen
(1979) Spelling [Spelling]. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Bosman, Anna M.T
(2004) Spellingvaardigheid en leren spellen [Spelling skill and learning to spell]. In André Vyt, Marcel A.G. van Aken, J.D. Bosch, Rutger J. van der Gaag & J.J.M. Ruyssenaars (eds.), Jaarboek ontwikkelingspsychologie, orthopedagogiek en kinderpsychiatrie 6, 2004–2005, 155–188. Houten, the Netherlands: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum.Google Scholar
(2007) Zo leer je kinderen lezen en spellen [How to teach children reading and spelling]. Tijdschrift voor Orthopedagogiek 461: 451–465.Google Scholar
Bosman, Anna M.T. & Annette M.B. de Groot
(1992) Differential effectiveness of reading and non-reading tasks in learning to spell. In Fred Satow & Bill Gatherer (eds.), Literacy without frontiers, 279–289. Widnes: United Kingdom Reading Association.Google Scholar
Bosman, Anna M.T., Janet G. van Hell & Ludo Verhoeven
(2006) Learning the spelling of strange words in Dutch benefits from regularized reading. Journal of Educational Psychology 981: 879–890. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bryant, Peter, Héléne Deacon & Terezinha Nunes
(2006) Morphology and spelling: What have morphemes to do with spelling? In R. Malatesha Joshi & P.G. Aaron (eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy, 601–616. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bryant, Peter, Terezinha Nunes & Rowena Snaith
(2000) Children learn an untaught rule of spelling. Nature 4031: 157–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butyniec-Thomas, Jean & Vera E. Woloshyn
(1997) The effects of explicit-strategy and whole-language instruction on students’ spelling ability. The Journal of Experimental Education 651: 293–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cleeremans, Axel
(1993) Mechanisms of implicit learning. Connectionist models of sequence processing. Palatino, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cleeremans, Axel & Arnaud Destrebecqz
(2005) Real rules are conscious. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 281: 19–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Antonie & Albert Kraak
(1972) Spellen is spellen is spellen. Een verkenning van de spellingproblematiek [To spell is to spell is to spell. An investigation of the spelling issue]. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. DOI logo_6Google Scholar
Darch, Craig, Ronald C. Eaves, D. Allan Crowe, Kate Simmons & Alexandra Conniff
(2006) Teaching spelling to students with learning disabilities: A comparison of rule-based strategies versus traditional instruction. Journal of Direct Instruction 61: 1–16.Google Scholar
Graham, Steve
(1999) Handwriting and spelling instruction for students with learning disabilities: A review. Learning Disability Quarterly 221: 78–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000) Should the natural learning approach replace spelling instruction? Journal of Educational Psychology 921: 235–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graham, Steve, Karen R. Harris & Barbara F. Chorzempa
(2002) Contribution of spelling instruction to the spelling, writing, and reading of poor spellers. Journal of Educational Psychology 941: 669–686. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilte, Maartje & Pieter Reitsma
(2011) Effects of explicit rules in learning to spell open- and closed-syllable words. Learning and Instruction 211: 34–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hubbert, Emily R., Kimberly P. Weber & T.F. McLaughlin
(2000) A comparison of copy, cover, and compare and a traditional spelling intervention for an adolescent with a conduct disorder. Child & Family Behavior Therapy 221: 55–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemp, Nenagh & Peter Bryant
(2003) Do beez buzz? Rule-based and frequency-based knowledge in learning to spell plural -s. Child Development 741: 63–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemper, Marion J., Ludo Verhoeven & Anna M.T. Bosman
(2012) Implicit and explicit instruction of spelling rules. Learning and Individual Differences 221: 639–649. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kernaghan, Kelly & Vera E. Woloshyn
(1995) Providing grade one students with multiple spelling strategies: Comparisons between strategy instruction, strategy instruction with metacognitive information, and traditional language arts. Applied Cognitive Psychology 91: 157–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Joseph. F., Carol L. Hern, R.L. Williams & T F. McLaughlin
(1990) The effects of the copy, cover, compare approach in increasing spelling accuracy with learning disabled students. Contemporary Educational Psychology 151: 378–386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neijt, Anneke & Robert Schreuder
(2007) Asymmetrical phoneme-grapheme mapping of coronal plosives in Dutch. Written Language and Literacy 101: 139–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pacton, Sébastien, Pierre Perruchet, Michel Fayol & Axel Cleeremans
(2001) Implicit learning out of the lab: The case of orthographic regularities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1301: 401–426. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reber, Arthur S
(1989) Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1181: 219–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1993) Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. An essay on the cognitive unconscious. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schaerlaekens, A.M., Geldolph A. Kohnstamm & Maryline Lejaegere
(1999) Streeflijst woordenschat voor zesjarigen. Derde herziene versie gebaseerd op nieuw onderzoek in Nederland en België [List of words that the vocabulary of six-year olds intended to contain. Third revised version based on new research in the Netherlands and Belgium]. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger B.V.Google Scholar
Seger, Carol A
(1994) Implicit learning. Psychological Bulletin 1151: 163–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steffler, Dorothy J
(2001) Implicit cognition and spelling development. Developmental Review 211: 168–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004) An investigation of grade 5 children’s knowledge of the doubling rule in spelling. Journal of Research in Reading 271: 248–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
te Winkel, Lammert A
(1863) Ontwerp der Spelling [Spelling design]. Leiden: D. Noothoven van Goor.Google Scholar
(1865). De grondbeginselen der Nederlandsche spelling, regeling der spelling voor het woordenboek der Nederlandsche taal [Basic principles of Dutch spelling, regulation of the spelling for the dictionary of the Dutch language]. Leiden: D. Noothoven van Goor.Google Scholar
Treiman, Rebecca
(1993) Beginning to spell. A study of first-grade children. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
van den Bosch, Linde, Paul Gillijns, Ronald Krom & Fons Moelands
(1991) Schaal Vorderingen in Spellingvaardigheid 1. Handleiding [Scale progression in spelling abilities 1. Manual]. Arnhem: Cito.Google Scholar
van Doorn-van Eijsden, Marise
(1984) Leer je spellen door veel te lezen [Do you learn to spell by reading a lot]? Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing 61: 252–263.Google Scholar
van Hell, Janet G., Anna M.T. Bosman & Monique C.G. Bartelings
(2003) Visual dictation improves the spelling performance of three groups of Dutch students with spelling disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly 261: 239–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Leerdam, Martin, Anna M.T. Bosman & Guy C. Van Orden
(1998) The ecology of spelling instruction: effective training in first grade. In Pieter Reitsma & Ludo Verhoeven (eds.), Problems and interventions in literacy development, 307–320. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhoeven, Ludo
(1995) Drie-Minuten-Toets. Handleiding [Three-Minutes-Test. Manual]. Arnhem: Cito.Google Scholar
Wanzek, Jeanne, Sharon Vaughn, Jade Wexler, Elizabeth A. Swanson, Meghan Edmonds & Ae-Hwa Kim
(2006) A synthesis of spelling and reading interventions and their effects on the spelling outcomes of students with LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities 391: 528–543. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Alsaawi, Ali
2015. Spelling Errors Made by Arab Learners of English. SSRN Electronic Journal DOI logo
Gruhn, Sophie, Eliane Segers & Ludo Verhoeven
2019. The Efficiency of Briefly Presenting Word Forms in a Computerized Repeated Spelling Training. Reading & Writing Quarterly 35:3 ► pp. 225 ff. DOI logo
van den Boer, Madelon & Elise H. de Bree
2023. To Show or Tell: Improving the Spelling of Rule-Based Words with Explicit or Implicit Practice. Scientific Studies of Reading ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Verhoeven, Ludo
2019. Developmental Dyslexia in Dutch. In Developmental Dyslexia across Languages and Writing Systems, ► pp. 73 ff. DOI logo
Zhao, Ningning, Yanhua Li, Ping Li, Kunlin Zhong, Annemie Desoete & Qiuling Zhang
2023. The characteristics of spelling difficulties for Chinese students. Global Chinese 9:1 ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.