Article published in:
Written Language & Literacy
Vol. 19:2 (2016) ► pp. 189211
References
Augst, Gerhard
(1980) Die graphematische Dehnungsbezeichnung und die Möglichkeiten einer Reform. Deutsche Sprache, 41: 306–326.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald, Richard Piepenbrock & Leon Gulikers
(1995) The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Berg, Kristian
(2012) Identifying graphematic units. Vowel and consonant letters. Written Language & Literacy 15(1): 26–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berg, Kristian, Beatrice Primus & Lutz Wagner
(2016) Buchstabenmerkmal, Buchstabe, Graphem. In: Beatrice Primus & Ulrike Domahs (eds.), Laut – Gebärde – Buchstabe, 337–355. Berlin/ New York: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carney, Edward
(1994) A Survey of English Spelling. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cook, Vivian
(2004) The English Writing System. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Davis, Stuart
(1988) Syllable onsets as a factor in stress rules. Phonology 51: 1–10. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Domahs, Frank, Ria de Bleser & Peter Eisenberg
(2001) Silbische Aspekte segmentalen Schreibens – neurolinguistische Evidenz. Linguistische Berichte 1851: 13–30.Google Scholar
Domahs, Ulirke, Ingo Plag & Rebecca Carroll
(2014) Word stress assignment in German, English and Dutch: Quantity-sensitivity and extrametricality revisited. Journal of comparative Germanic linguistics 171: 59–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, Peter
(2006) Grundriß der deutschen Grammatik. Bd. 1: Das Wort. 3 edn. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler.Google Scholar
Everett, Daniel L. & Keren Everett
(1984) On the relevance of syllable onsets to stress placement. Linguistic Inquiry 15(4): 705–711.Google Scholar
Evertz, Martin
(2014) Visual Prosody – The graphematic foot in English and German. Ph.D. thesis. University of Cologne: Germany.Google Scholar
(2016) Graphematischer Fuß und graphematisches Wort. In Beatrice Primus & Ulrike Domahs (eds.), Laut – Gebärde – Buchstabe, 377–398. Berlin/ New York: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evertz, Martin & Beatrice Primus
(2013) The graphematic foot in English and German. Writing Systems Research 5(1): 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ewen, Colin J. & Harry van der Hulst
(2001) The phonological Structure of Words. An introduction. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Fronek, Josef
(1982)  Thing as a function word. Linguistics 201: 633–654. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fuhrhop, Nana
(2008) Das graphematische Wort (im Deutschen): Eine erste Annäherung. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 271: 189–228. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fuhrhop, Nana, Franziska Buchmann & Kristian Berg
(2011) The length hierarchy and the graphematic syllable: Evidence from German and English. Written Language & Literacy 14.2: 275–292. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giegerich, Heinz J.
(1992) English phonology: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hall, T. Alan
(1999) Phonotactics and the Prosodic Structure of German Function Words. In Alan T. Hall & Ursula Kleinhenz, (eds.), Studies on the Phonological Word, 99–131. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kabak, Bariş & René Schiering
(2006) The Phonology and Morphology of Function Word Contractions in German. Journal of comparative Germanic linguistics 91: 53–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kandel, Sonia, Lucie Hérault, Géraldine Grosjacques, Eric Lambert & Michel Fayol
(2009) Orthographic vs. phonologic syllables in handwriting production. Cognition 1101: 440–444. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Michael H.
(2004) Word onset patterns and lexical stress in English. Journal of memory and language 501: 231–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maas, Utz
(1999) Einführung in die funktionale Phonetik des Deutschen. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. & Alan Prince
(1995) Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In Jill Beckman, Suzanne Urbanczyk & Laura Walsh Dickey (eds.), University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18: Papers in Optimality Theory, 249–384. Amherst: GLSA.Google Scholar
Neef, Martin
(2010) Die Schreibung nicht-nativer Einheiten in einer Schriftsystemtheorie mit einem mehrschichtigen Wortschatzmodell. In Carmen Scherer & Anke Holler (eds.), Strategien der Integration und Isolation nicht-nativer Einheiten und Strukturen, 11–29. Berlin/ New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Primus, Beatrice
(2000) Suprasegmentale Graphematik und Phonologie: Die Dehnungszeichen im Deutschen. Linguistische Berichte 1811: 5–30.Google Scholar
(2003) Zum Silbenbegriff in der Schrift-, Laut- und Gebärdensprache – Versuch einer mediumübergreifenden Fundierung. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 221: 3–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) A featural analysis of the modern Roman alphabet. Written Language & Literacy 7.2: 235–274.Google Scholar
(2010) Strukturelle Grundlagen des deutschen Schriftsystems. In Ursula Bredel, Astrid Müller & Gabriele Hinney (eds.), Schriftsystem und Schrifterwerb: linguistisch – didaktisch – empirisch, 9–45. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky
(1993) Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Ms., Rutgers University (= Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science Technical Report 2).Google Scholar
Ramers, Karl Heinz
(1998) Minimale Wörter: Prosodische Beschränkungen graphischer Wortstrukturen. In Bernd J. Kröger, Christine Riek & Georg Sachse (eds.), Festschrift für Georg Heike, 25–39. Frankfurt am Main: Forum Phoneticum 66.Google Scholar
Roemheld, Friedrich
(1955) Die Längenbezeichnung in der deutschen Rechtschreibung. Der Deutschunterricht 71, 71–82.Google Scholar
Rollings, Aandrew G.
(2004) The spelling patterns of English. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Roubah, Aïcha & Marcus Taft
(2001) The functional role of syllabic structure in French visual word recognition. Memory & Cognition 291: 373–381. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Röttger, Timo B, Ulrike Domahs, Marion Grande & Frank Domahs
(2012) Structural factors affecting the assignment of word stress in German. Journal of Germanic linguistics 24(1): 53–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. O.
(1984) Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1996) The prosodic structure of function words. In James L. Morgan & Katherine Demuth (eds.), Signal to Syntax, 187–213. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar