Article published In:
Orthographic Databases and Lexicons
Edited by Lynne Cahill and Terry Joyce
[Written Language & Literacy 20:1] 2017
► pp. 5279
Assink, Egbert M. H., Caroline Vooijs & Paul P. N. A. Knuijt
(2000) Prefixes as access units in visual word recognition: A comparison of Italian and Dutch data. Reading and Writing 121, 149–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beeksma, Merijn, Anneke Neijt & Johan Zuidema
Booij, Geert E. (1987) The reflection of linguistic structure in Dutch spelling. In P. A. Luelsdorff (ed.), Orthography and Phonology, 215–224. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borgwaldt, Susanne R. & Annette M. B. de Groot
(2002) Beyond the rime – Measuring the consistency of monosyllabic and polysyllabic words. In Martin Neef, Anneke Neijt & Richard Sproat (eds.), The relation of writing to spoken language, 49–69. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borgwaldt, Susanne R., Frauke M. Hellwig & Annette M. B. de Groot
(2005) Onset entropy matters: Letter-to-phoneme mappings in seven languages. Reading and Writing 181: 211–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bosman, Anna M. T., Janet G. van Hell & Ludo Verhoeven
(2006) Learning the spelling of strange words in Dutch benefits from regularized reading. Journal of Educational Psychology 981, 879–890. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bosman, Anna M. T., & Guy Van Orden
(1997) Why spelling is more difficult than reading. In C. A. Perfetti, L. Riebel, & M. Fayol (eds.), Learning to spell: Research, theory, and practice across languages, 173–194. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Brouwer, Dick H. M.
(1993) Op weg naar effectief spellingonderwijs. [Towards effective spelling education]. Hoevelaken: CPS Primair Onderwijsreeks.Google Scholar
Carney, Edward
(1994) A Survey of English Spelling. London & New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cranshoff, Betty & Johan Zuidema
(2004–2008) Zin in Spelling [Fancy Spelling]. Tilburg: Zwijsen.Google Scholar
(2005, 2010) Van Dale Basisspellinggids. Utrecht & Antwerpen: Van Dale, Tilburg: Zwijsen (first and second edition).Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk
(2002) Groot woordenboek van de Nederlandse taal ( cd-rom, version 1.0 Plus).Google Scholar
Hanssen, Esther, Robert Schreuder & Anneke Neijt
(2015) From t-bias to d-bias. Evidence from children’s spelling and pronunciation. Written Language and Literacy 181, 104–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heuven, Vincent van, Anneke Neijt & Maarten Hijzelendoorn
(1994) Automatische indeling van Nederlandse woorden op basis van etymologische filters. Spektator 231, 279–291.Google Scholar
Keuning, Jos & Ludo Verhoeven
(2008) Spelling development throughout the elementary grades: The Dutch case. Learning and Individual Differences 181, 459–470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kraak, Albert
(2006) Homo loquens en homo scribens. Over natuur en cultuur bij de taal. [Homo loquens and homo scribens. Nature and culture in language.] Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neef, Martin
(2005) Die Graphematik des Deutschen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neijt, Anneke
(2002) The interfaces of writing and grammar. In Martin Neef, Anneke Neijt & Richard Sproat (eds.), The relation of writing to spoken language. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 11–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neijt, Anneke, Mijntje Peters & Johan Zuidema
(2012) The 12321 model of Dutch spelling acquisition. In Marion Elenbaas & Suzanne Aalberse (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 2012, 111–122. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Nooteboom, Sieb
(2007) Alphabetics. From phonemes to letters or from letters to phonemes? Written Language and Literacy 101, 129–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Notenboom, Annelise & Pieter Reitsma
(2007) Spelling Dutch Doublets: Children’s Learning of a Phonological and Morphological Spelling Rule’, Scientific Studies of Reading 111, 133–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nunn, Anneke Marijke
(1998) Dutch orthography. A Systematic Investigation of the Spelling of Dutch Words. PhD Dissertation. LOT dissertation series 6. Den Haag: Holland Academic Graphics. [URL]
Peters, Mijntje
in preparation). PhD-thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen.
Spelling Bank (1999) Lists of words and activities for the KS2 spelling objectives. Department for education and employment, London. [URL]
Sproat, Richard
(2000) A computational theory of writing systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2002) ‘The consistency of the orthographically relevant level in Dutch’. In Martin Neef, Anneke Neijt & Richard Sproat (eds.). The relation of writing to spoken language. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 35–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Venezky, Richard L. S.
(1999) The American way of spelling. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Verhaert, Nina, Ellen Danckaert & Dominiek Sandra
(2015) Woordenlijst van de Nederlandse Taal. De Taalunie, ’s Gravenhage. [URL].
Zonneveld, Wim
(1980) Autonome spelling. De nieuwe taalgids 731, 518–536.Google Scholar
Zuidema, Johan & Anneke Neijt
(2012) Verkennend onderzoek naar de wenselijkheid en de haalbaarheid van een verrijking van de Woordenlijst Nederlandse Taal ten behoeve van spellingonderwijs. [Exploratory study of the desirability and feasibility of enrichment of the spelling dictionary for the benefit of spelling instruction]. By assignment of the Nederlandse Taalunie. [URL]