Cover not available
Part of
Contested Languages: The hidden multilingualism of Europe
Edited by Marco Tamburelli and Mauro Tosco
[Studies in World Language Problems 8] 2021
► pp. 87–104

Chapter 5
The cost of ignoring degrees of Abstand in defining a regional language

Evidence from South Tyrol

| Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
| Bangor University
It is generally accepted that the concepts ‘language’ and ‘dialect’ are not entirely linguistic notions, but also involve social, cultural and political factors. Nonetheless, it is still nowadays difficult to agree upon a set of satisfying criteria by which ‘languages’ can be differentiated from ‘dialects’. In this chapter, we analyse the linguistic context present in South Tyrol in order to highlight the consequences of these unsatisfying definitions. Using the intelligibility criterion, we demonstrate that there is a certain degree of Abstand between Standard German and the Bavarian variety spoken in South Tyrol. We then show how this degree of Abstand affects the early stages of acquisition and the linguistic performance of South Tyrolean children.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Sociolinguistic bilingualism: The South Tyrolean case
  • 3.Bilingualism: Who is bilingual and when?
  • 4.Measuring bilingualism: An empirical approach
  • 5.First empirical study: Measuring intelligibility between Standard German and Bavarian
    • 5.1Design and procedure
    • 5.2Materials and stimuli
    • 5.3Participants
    • 5.4Results
    • 5.5Discussion and summary
  • 6.Second empirical study: South Tyroleans’ receptive language comprehension in German
    • 6.1Design and Procedure
    • 6.2Materials and stimuli
    • 6.3Participants
    • 6.4Results
    • 6.5Discussion and Summary
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 21 January 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/wlp.8.05leo
References (56)
References
Abfalterer, Heidemaria. 2007. Der Südtiroler Sonderwortschatz aus plurizentrischer Sicht. Lexikalisch-semantische Besonderheiten im Standarddeutsch Südtirols. Innsbruck: Innsbruck University Press.Google Scholar
Aliprandini, Marco. 2000. Strumenti… in funzione: esercizi di grammatica italiana con confronti fra italiano, tedesco e dialetto sudtirolese. Bozen: Edizioni Praxis 3.Google Scholar
Ammon, Ulrich. 1986. Explikation der Begriffe ‘Standardvarietät’ und ‘Standardsprache’ auf normtheoretischer Grundlage. In Sprachlicher Substandard, ed. by Günter Holtus, and Edgar Radtke, 1–63. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1989. Towards a descriptive framework for the status/function (social position) of a language within a country. In Status and function of languages and language varieties, ed. by Ulrich Ammon, 21–106. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ASTAT – Provincial Statistics Institute. 2014. South Tyrol in figures 2014. Bozen: Autonomous Province of South Tyrol. [URL] (accessed 10th July 2018).
ASTAT – Provincial Statistics Institute. 2019. South Tyrol in figures 2019. Bozen: Autonomous Province of South Tyrol. [URL]
Baetens Beardsmore, Hugo. 1982. Bilingualism: basic principles. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Beijering, Karin, Charlotte Gooskens, and Wilbert Heeringa. 2008. Predicting intelligibility and perceived linguistic distances by means of the Levenshtein algorithm. Linguistics in the Netherlands 25 (1): 13–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chambers, Jack K., and Peter Trudgill. 1998. Dialectology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colleselli, Toni, Franz Lanthaler, and Aldo Mazza. 2009. Schian isch’s gwesn. Nuove lezioni per comprendere il tedesco di tutti i giorni in Alto Adige Südtirol. Meran: Alpha&Beta Verlag.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. 1997. The rise and fall of languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egger, Kurt. 1982. Übungen zum Vermeiden dialektbedingter Fehler im Bereich der Präpositionen. In Dialekt und Hochsprache in der Schule. Beiträge zum Deutschunterricht in Südtirol, ed. by Kurt Egger, 111–127. Bozen: Südtiroler Kulturinstitut und Arbeitskreis Südtiroler Mittelschullehrer.Google Scholar
. 1985. Zweisprachige Familien in Südtirol: Sprachgebrauch und Spracherziehung. Innsbruck: Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar
. 1994. Die Sprachen unserer Kinder. Spracherwerb in einem mehrsprachigen Gebiet. Meran: Alpha&Beta Verlag.Google Scholar
Eichinger, Ludwig. 2002. South Tyrol: German and Italian in a changing world. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 23 (1–2): 137–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fasold, Ralph W. 2005. Making languages. In ISB4: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Bilingualism, ed. by James Cohen, Kara T. McAlister, Kellie Rolstad and Jeff MacSwan, 697–702. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles. 1959. Diglossia. Word 15: 325–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991. Epilogue: Diglossia revisited. Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 10 (1): 214–234.Google Scholar
Fishman, Joshua A. 2008. Rethinking the Ausbau-Abstand dichotomy into a continuous and multivariate system. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 191: 17–26.Google Scholar
Fox, Annette. 2013. TROG-D. Test zur Überprüfung des Grammatikverständnisses. 6th Edition. Schulz-Kirchner Verlag.Google Scholar
Gathercole, Virginia C. and Enlli M. Thomas. 2009. Bilingual first-language development: dominant language takeover, threatened minority language take-up. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12 (2): 213–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glück, Alexander, Mara M. V. Leonardi, and Claudia M. Riehl. 2019. Südtirol. In Handbuch des Deutschen in West- und Mitteleuropa: Sprachminderheiten und Mehrsprachigkeitskonstellationen. ed. by Rahel Beyer and Albrecht Plewnia, 245–280. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto.Google Scholar
Gooskens, Charlotte. 2007. The contribution of linguistic factors to the intelligibility of closely related languages. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 28 (6): 445–467. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Methods for measuring intelligibility of closely related language varieties. In Handbook of Sociolinguistics, ed. by Robert Bayley, Richard Cameron and Ceil Lucas, 195–213. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gurschler, Michael, and Evi R. Tscholl. 2015. DaZUgeHÖREN. Südtiroler Dialekt von Jugendlichen für Jugendliche. Arbeitsmaterialien zum Südtiroler Dialekt. Bozen: Deutsches Bildungsressort. [URL] (accessed 22nd Sept 2020)
Hammarström, Harald. 2008. Counting languages in dialect continua using the criterion of mutual intelligibility. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 15 (1): 34–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hofer, Silvia. 2013. Deutsch ist nicht gleich Deutsch – Paese che vai, tedesco che trovi. Materialien für den Deutschunterricht in Südtirol. Bozen/Bolzano: Europäische Akademie Bozen.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Charlotte. 2014. An introduction to bilingualism. London, New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 2008. An introduction to sociolinguistics. 3rd Edition. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hudson, Alan. 2002. Outline of a theory of diglossia. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 157: 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kalikow, Daniel N., Kenneth N. Stevens, and Lois L. Elliott. 1977. Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 61 (5): 1337–1351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kloss, Heinz. 1967. Abstand languages and Ausbau languages. Anthropological Linguistics 9 (7): 29–41.Google Scholar
Knapp, Alfred, Justine Gruber, and Toni Colleselli. 1996. Hoi Hanni. Hörverständnisübungen zum Südtiroler Deutsch. Con un saggio di Franz Lanthaler. Meran: Alpha&Beta Verlag.Google Scholar
Langer, Nils, and Winifred Davies. 2005. An introduction to linguistic purism. In Linguistic Purism in the Germanic Languages, ed. by Nils Langer and Winifred Davies, 1–17. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lanthaler, Franz. 2012. Dialekt in der Klasse oder: den Kindern ihre Sprache. In Franz Lanthaler. Texte zu Sprache und Schule in Südtirol, ed. by Hans Drumbl and Horst Sitta, 1974–2012. Meran: Alpha&Beta Verlag, pp. 425–436.Google Scholar
Leonardi, Mara M. V. 2016. Bilingualism or trilingualism? Social versus linguistic views: evidence from the Germanic-speaking language group in South Tyrol (Italy). Doctoral Dissertation. Bangor University.Google Scholar
2020a. Famiglie plurilingui in Alto Adige. Pratiche linguistiche e appartenenza linguistica. In Lingue minoritarie tra localismi e globalizzazione, ed. by Antonietta Marra and Silvia Dal Negro. Milano: Studi AItLA 11, pp. 167–181. [URL]
2020b. “I hardly ever practice the real Standard German.” Self-reported language use and language proficiency in South Tyrol (Italy). In Linguistik Online 102 (2/20): 83–98. [URL]
Mackey, William F. 2000. The description of bilingualism. In The bilingualism reader, ed. by Li Wei, 22–52. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Montrul, Silvina A. 2008. Incomplete acquisition in bilingualism: re-examining the age factor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munro, Murray J., Tracey M. Derwing, and Susan L. Morton. 2006. The mutual intelligibility of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28 (1): 111–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oller, D. Kimbrough, and Rebecca E. Eilers. 2002. Language and literacy in bilingual children. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salminen, Tapani. 2007. Europe and North Asia. In Encyclopedia of the world’s endangered languages, ed. by Christopher Moseley, 211–282. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Saxalber-Tetter, Annemarie. 1994. Dialekt-Hochsprache als Unterrichtsthema: Anregungen für die Deutschlehrer/innen der Mittel- und Oberschule. 2nd Edition. Bozen: Südtiroler Kulturinstitut.Google Scholar
Schepens, Job, Ton Dijkstra, and Franc Grootjen. 2012. Distributions of cognates in Europe as based on Levenshtein distance. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 15 (1): 157–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tamburelli, Marco. 2014. Uncovering the ‘hidden’ multilingualism of Europe: an Italian case study. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 35 (3): 252–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tang, Chaoju, and Vincent J. van Heuven. 2009. Mutual intelligibility of Chinese dialects experimentally tested. Lingua 119 (5): 709–732. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Predicting mutual intelligibility of Chinese dialects from multiple objective linguistic distance measures. Linguistics 53 (2): 285–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tosco, Mauro. 2008. Introduction: Ausbau is everywhere! International Journal of the Sociology of Language 191: 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1992. Ausbau sociolinguistics and the perception of language status in contemporary Europe. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 2 (2): 167–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. Sociolinguistic variation and change. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Van Bezooijen, Renee, and Charlotte Gooskens. 2005. How easy is it for speakers of Dutch to understand spoken and written Frisian and Afrikaans, and why? In Linguistics in the Netherlands 22 (1), ed. by Jenny Doetjes and Jeroen van de Weijer, 13–24.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vettori, Chiara, Katrin Wisniewski, and Andrea Abel. 2012. Becoming bilingual in a multilingual context: A snapshot view of L2 competences in South Tyrol. In Multilingual Individuals and Multilingual Societies, ed. by Kurt Braunmüller and Christoph Gabriel, 437–456. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wardhaugh, Ronald. 2006. An introduction to sociolinguistics. 5th Edition. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wei, Li. 2000. Dimensions of bilingualism. In The bilingualism reader, ed. by Li Wei, 2–21. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel. 1953. Languages in contact: findings and problems. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Tamburelli, Marco
2024. Attitudes from Above: How Ausbau-centric Approaches Hinder the Maintenance of Linguistic diversity and why we must rediscover the role of structural relations . In Language Attitudes and Bi(dia)lectal Competence , DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.