Cover not available
Part of
Advances in Interdisciplinary Language Policy
Edited by François Grin, László Marácz and Nike K. Pokorn
[Studies in World Language Problems 9] 2022
► pp. 23–42

Chapter 2
Principles of integrated language policy

| University of Geneva
This chapter proposes a novel perspective on language policy as a form of public policy, highlighting some of the epistemological implications of this approach and discussing its linkages with more standard approaches originating in applied linguistics. After introducing the relevance of interdisciplinarity and complexity as defining features of this enterprise, it focuses on the connections between principles of public policy on the one hand, and the specificities of language policy on the other hand. To this end, this chapter develops an entirely novel typology of the main dimensions of language policy (type, domain, sphere, tier, welfare, target, causation and instrument), with which the latter may be extensively described and characterised. These dimensions bring to the fore the importance of jointly considering the micro, meso and macro levels at which language policies necessarily unfold. Given the extreme complexity of practically any language policy, and the associated difficulty of establishing the full range of effects (including both advantages and drawbacks) of alternative policy choices, analysts often need to fall back on pragmatic solutions in the selection and design process. Accordingly, this chapter emphasizes the role of plausibility as a valid criterion for evaluating such effects.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Integrated language policy in MIME
  • 3.Key concepts and tools
    • Interdisciplinarity
    • Complexity
    • Policy relevance
  • 4.From theoretical principles to application
  • 5.Discussion: Adding plausibility
  • 6.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 21 January 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/wlp.9.02gri
References (44)
References
Bar-Yam, Yaneer. (2005). Making Things Work: Solving Complex Problems in a Complex World. Cambridge: Knowledge Press (NECSI).Google Scholar
Becker, Gary. (1976). The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Berthoud, Anne-Claude, Grin, François & Lüdi, Georges. (2013). Exploring the Dynamics of Multilingualism. The DYLAN Project. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Cardinal, Linda & Sonntag, Selma (Eds.) (2015). State Traditions and Language Regimes. Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Civico, Marco. (2018). ‘Why are computer-based simulations useful in the selection and design of complex language policies?’, in F. Grin et al. (Eds.), The MIME Vademecum (pp. 52–53). Retrieved from: [URL]
. (2019). The Dynamics of Language Minorities: Evidence from an Agent-Based Model of Language Contact, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation (JASSS) 22(4), 3. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Coenen-Huther, Jacques. (1989). ‘Sociologie et interdisciplinarité : modalités, problèmes, perspectives’, Revue suisse de sociologie 15 (1), 1–13.Google Scholar
Cooper, Robert. (1989). Language planning and social change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dell’Aquila, Vittorio & Iannàccaro, Gabriele. (2002). Modelli europei di pianificazione linguistica. Vigo di Fassa: Istitut Cultural Ladin.Google Scholar
Dunn, William N. (1994). Public Policy Analysis (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Edwards, John. (1994). Multilingualism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fishman, Joshua. (1991). Reversing language shift: theoretical and empirical foundations of assistance to threatened languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Gazzola, Michele. (2013). The Evaluation of Language Regimes: Theory and Application to Multilingual Patent Organisations. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Gazzola, Michele, Grin, François & Vaillancourt, François. (2020). ‘The Economic Evaluation of Language Policy and Planning: An Introduction to Existing Work’, in S. Mufwene and C. Vigouroux (Eds.), Bridging Linguistics and Economics (pp. 109–139). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Georgeault, Pierre & Pagé, Michel (Eds.) (2006). Le français, langue de la diversité québécoise. Une réflexion pluridisciplinaire. Montreal: Québec-Amérique.Google Scholar
Grin, François. (2003a). ‘Diversity as paradigm, analytical device, and policy goal’, in W. Kymlicka, & A. Patten (Eds.), Language Rights and Political Theory (pp. 169–188). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. (2003b). Economics and language planning, Current Issues in Language Planning, 4(1), 1–66. DOI logo.Google Scholar
. (2003c). Language Policy Evaluation and the European Charter for Regional and Minority Languages. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logo.Google Scholar
. (2018). ‘The MIME Vademecum: an Introduction’, in F. Grin et al. (Eds.), The MIME Vademecum (pp. 14–25). Retrieved from: [URL]
. (2020). ‘Operationalizing “diversity” for language policy: meeting sociolinguistic and ethical challenges’, in Y. Peled and D. Weinstock (Eds.), Language Ethics (pp. 117–145). Kingston: McGill-Queens University. DOI logo.Google Scholar
. (2021a). ‘Internationalisation et anglicisation des universités: diagnostic et éléments de stratégie’, in C. Tremblay (Ed.), Gouvernance linguistique des universités et établissements d’enseignement supérieur. Paris: Presses de l’École Polytechnique, in press.Google Scholar
. (2021b). ‘Sociolinguistics and economics: reassessing an ongoing dialogue’, in L. McEntee-Atalianis and H. Tonkin (Eds.), Language and Sustainability. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, in press.Google Scholar
Grin, François & Fürst, Guillaume. (2018). Multilingualism and Creativity: A Multivariate Approach, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 39(4), 341–355. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Hult, Francis M. & Johnson, David C. (Eds.) (2015). Research Methods in Language Policy and Planning: A Practical Guide. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Janssens, Rudi. (2018). ‘Can EU policy improve social inclusion in local urban contexts?’, in F. Grin et al. (Eds.), The MIME Vademecum (pp. 108–109). Retrieved from: [URL].
Johnson, David C. (2013). Language Policy. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Robert & Baldauf, Richard. (1997). Language planning. From practice to theory. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Kloss, Heinz. (1969). Research possibilities on group bilingualism: a report. Québec: Centre international de recherche sur le bilinguisme (CIRB).Google Scholar
Knoepfel, Peter, Larrue, Corinne, Varone, Frédéric & Savard, Jean-François. (2015). Analyse et pilotage des politiques publiques. Montréal: Presses de l’Université du Québec. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Lyall, Catherine. (2019). Being an interdisciplinary academic. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Mamadouh, Virginie & El Ayadi, Nesrin. (2018). ‘Should municipalities regulate language use in public space?’, in F. Grin et al. (Eds.), The MIME Vademecum (pp. 112–113). Retrieved from: [URL].
Morin, Edgar. (1990). Introduction à la pensée complexe. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Nelde, Peter. (1992). ‘Multilingualism and contact linguistics’, in H. Pütz (Ed.), Thirty Years of Linguistics Evolution (pp. 379–397). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Page, Scott. (2010). Diversity and Complexity. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Pluckrose, Helen & Lindsay, James. (2020). Cynical Theories. How Universities Made Everything about Race, Gender, and Identity – and Why This Harms Everybody. Durham, NC: Pitchstone Publishing.Google Scholar
Pym, Anthony. (2018). ‘Should machine translation be used when providing public services?’, in F. Grin et al. (Eds.), The MIME Vademecum (pp. 152–153). Retrieved from: [URL].
Ricento, Thomas (Ed.) (2006). An Introduction to Language Policy. Theory and Method. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Room, Graham. (2011). Complexity, Institutions and Public Policy. Agile Decision-Making in a Turbulent World. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Rossi, Peter H., Lipsey, Mark W. & Freeman, Howard E. (2019). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (8th ed.). Thousand Oaks & London: Sage.Google Scholar
Spolsky, Bernard (Ed.) (2012). The Cambridge Handbook of Language Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Tollefson, James & Pérez-Milans, Miguel. (2018). The Oxford Handbook of Language Policy and Planning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Wheelan, Charles. (2011). Introduction to Public Policy. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Weimer, David L. & Vining, Aidan R. (2017). Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice (6th ed.). New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wickström, Bengt-Arne, Templin, Torsten, & Gazzola, Michele. (2018). ‘An economics approach to language policy and linguistic justice’, in M. Gazzola, B.-A. Wickström & T. Templin (Eds.) Language Policy and Linguistic Justice: Economic, Philosophical and Sociolinguistic Approaches (pp. 3–64). New York & Berlin: Springer. DOI logo.Google Scholar