Chapter published in:
Advances in Interdisciplinary Language PolicyEdited by François Grin, László Marácz and Nike K. Pokorn
[Studies in World Language Problems 9] 2022
► pp. 67–86
Chapter 4How to upgrade the status of migrant languages in the European Union
Christopher Houtkamp | University of Amsterdam
László Marácz | University of Amsterdam
In this chapter, we will compare the status of traditional minority and migrant languages in the European context and its practical implications for the trade-off between mobility and inclusion. It has been observed that traditional minority languages in Central and Eastern European (CEE) states have fewer rights compared to official languages and that their status and position is best described by language hierarchies, asymmetries, subordination, and threshold restrictions. This against the background of international treaties, such as article 22 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (CFREU) stating that the European Union (EU) respects cultural, religious, and linguistic diversity and the charters of the Council of Europe (CoE). Although linguistic inequality is an unwanted state of affairs violating international treaties and obligations of member states, these traditional minority language cases might refer to the assignment of linguistic rights to languages of migrants. Both categories belong to the domain of the non-official, majority languages and are expected to be assigned less rights than ‘national languages’, although traditional minority languages have been assigned limited rights in terms of the personality principle next to the territoriality principle applied to the national languages. Note that the language rights of migrants in the EU are also restricted by the mobility-and-inclusion trade-off, which is detrimental to migrant languages in the national context. A solution to this inequality is provided by the fact that the personality principle is a common denominator in the assignment of linguistic rights to minority-language speakers and has already been introduced into transnational European spaces. Hence, the rights of migrant languages can be accounted for by applying the personality principle in these spaces as well. This results in a Union-wide supranational language policy for migrant languages which supports the upgrading of migrant languages in accordance with the personality principle.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Migrant language status and the MIME project
- 3.Key concepts and tools
- 4.Introducing traditional minority languages and migrant languages
- 4.1Traditional minority languages
- Literature review
- Data and methods
- Analysis
- Results
- 4.2Migrant languages
- Literature review
- Data and methods
- Analysis
- Results
- Documents and interviews: How do ‘national models’ affect migrants’ appropriation and competence?
- 4.1Traditional minority languages
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusion
-
Notes -
References -
Legal and political documents, sources and files
Published online: 21 January 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/wlp.9.04hou
https://doi.org/10.1075/wlp.9.04hou
References
Arends-Tóth, Judit & Van de Vijver, Fons
Beregszászi, Anikó & Csernicskó, István
Bertossi, Christophe, Duyvendak, Jan Willem & Scholten, Peter
Bourhis, Richard Y., Moïse, Lána Céline, Perrault, Stéphane & Senécal, Sacha
Brubaker, Rogers
Brubaker, Rogers, Feischmidt, Margit, Fox, Jon & Grancea, Liana
Cardinal, Linda & Sonntag, Selma K.
Csata, Zsombor & Marácz, László K.
Csergo, Zsuzsa
Csergo, Zsuzsa & Goldgeier, James M.
Deets, Stephen
(2010) Networks and Composite States: Rethinking Minority Representation and Governance. Paper prepared for the International Studies Association Convention, February 16, 2010.
Dembinska, Magdalena, Marácz, László & Tonk, Márton
Dinan, Desmond
Fenyvesi, Anna
Gál, Kinga
Gal, Susan
Grabbe, Heather
Green, Simon
Hehman, Eric, Gaertner, Samuel L., Dovidio, John F., Mania, Eric W., Guerra, Rita, Wilson, David C. & Friel, Brian M.
Horváth, István, Veress, Ilka, & Vitos, Katalin
Houtkamp, Christopher
(2020) Multilingual Moves: Language and Motility of Migrant Communities in Europa, PhD dissertation. University of Amsterdam.
Joppke, Christian
Jutila, Matti
Kymlicka, Will & Patten, Alan
Lempp, Frieder & Marácz, László
Marácz, László
(2011) ‘Language Policies in Central and East European States with Hungarian Minorities: Implications for linguistic rights protection of national minorities in the EU’, in I. Horváth & M. Tonk (Eds.), Minority Politics within the Europe of Regions (pp. 155–184). Cluj-Napoca: Scientia Publishing House.
May, Stephen
McRae, Kenneth D.
Péntek, János
Rojas, Antonio J., Navas, Marisol, Sayans-Jiménez, Pablo & Cuadrado, Isabel
Sasse, Gwendolyn
Scholten, Peter & Penninx, Rinus
Schwellnuss, Guido
Skovgaard, Jacob
Szabómihály, Gizella
Taylor, Charles
Trifunovska, Snezana
Van Houdt, Friso, Suvarierol, Semin & Schinkel, Willem
Vizi, Balázs
Volman, Yvo
Appendix.Legal and political documents, sources and files
Commission of the European Communities
(2003) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, 2003: Promoting Language Learning and Linguistic Diversity: An Action Plan 2004 – 2006. COM (2003) 449 final. Retrieved from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=LEGISSUM:c11068.
(2008) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Multilingualism: an asset for Europe and a shared commitment. COM (2008) 566 final. Brussels 18 September 2008 Retrieved from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52008DC0566. 21.11.2017.
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, European Parliament. Report on the situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2015 (2016/2009(INI))
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions
Promoting Language Learning and Linguistic Diversity: An Action Plan 2004 – 2006. Retrieved from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2003:0449:FIN:en:PDF.
An Inventory of Community actions in the field of multilingualism – 2011 update. Retrieved from: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/doc/srv?l=EN&f=ST%2012727%202011%20INIT.
Congress of Local and Regional Authorities
(2017) Regional and minority languages in Europe today, adopted on 19 October 2017, CPR33(2017)02final. Retrieved from: https://rm.coe.int/regional-and-minority-languages-in-europe-today-current-affairs-commit/168075c431.
Council of Europe
(1992) Explanatory Report to the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages. Strasbourg. Retrieved from: https://rm.coe.int/16800cb5e5.
(2009) Application of the Charter in Serbia, Report of the Expert Committee on the Charter, Strasbourg 6 May 2009, ECRML (2009) 2. Retrieved from: https://rm.coe.int/16806db959.
(2016) The Framework Convention: a key tool to managing diversity through minority rights. Thematic Commentary No. 4 on the scope of application of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities. ACFC/56DOC(2016)001. Retrieved from: https://rm.coe.int/16806a8fe8.
European Commission
(February 2006) Europeans and their Languages. Special Eurobarometer 243. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/archives/ebs/ebs_243_en.pdf.
(June 2012) Europeans and their Languages. Special Eurobarometer 386. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/archives/ebs/ebs_386_en.pdf.
(2014) Overview of Diversity Management: Implementation and Impact amongst Diversity Charter signatories in the European Union. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/discrimination/files/diversity_report2014_en.pdf.
(October 2015) Discrimination in the EU in 2015, Special Barometer 437. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/COMMFrontOffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/Survey/getSurveyDetail/instruments/SPECIAL/surveyKy/2077.
European Parliament
Endangered European languages and linguistic diversity in the European Union. Directorate General for Internal Policies, Culture and Education. Retrieved from: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/note/join/2013/495851/IPOL-CULT_NT(2013)495851_EN.pdf.
Minderhedenbeleid (Minorities policy document), Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal
Nota Buitenlandse werknemers (Policy document on foreign workers)
Kamerstuk Tweede Kamer 1969–1970 kamerstuknummer 10504 ondernummer 2.
OSCE HCNM
(1996) The Hague Recommendations Regarding the Education Rights of National Minorities & Explanatory Note. The Hague. Retrieved from: http://www.osce.org/hcnm/32180?download=true.
(November 2012) The Ljubljana Guidelines on Integration of Diverse Societies & Explanatory Note. The Hague. Retrieved from: http://www.osce.org/hcnm/ljubljana-guidelines?download=true.
Protector of Citizens – Ombudsman
(2015) Regular Annual Report of the Protector of Citizens for 2015, Ref. No. 7873. Belgrade, 15 March 2016. Retrieved from: http://www.ombudsman.org.rs/attachments/article/132/Annual%20Report%202015.pdf.
Provincial Assembly Decision on Detailed Regulation of Some Issues Concerning Official Use of Language and Script of National Minorities in the Territory of the Autonomous Province of Vojvodina
Treaty on the European Union
Official Journal C 326, 26/10/2012 P. 0001 – 0390.
Venice Commission
(2001) Report on the Preferential Treatment of National Minorities by their Kin-State, adopted by the Venice Commission at its 48th Plenary Meeting, CDL01INF (2001), 19–20 October 2001.