Chapter published in:
Advances in Interdisciplinary Language PolicyEdited by François Grin, László Marácz and Nike K. Pokorn
[Studies in World Language Problems 9] 2022
► pp. 275–296
Chapter 14The language choices of exchange students
Between “After all, I’m here to learn Spanish” and “You get along very well without speaking Lithuanian”
Sabine Fiedler | University of Leipzig
Cyril Robert Brosch | Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities
The Erasmus Programme is the flagship of the EU’s academic exchange programmes. Taking as a point of departure that language proficiency is a key factor of a successful stay abroad, this research focuses on exchange students’ language learning and language choices. It draws on data collected between autumn 2015 and spring 2018 by means of online questionnaires and interviews with more than 500 participants. A major finding is that a large majority of exchange students consider learning the language of the host country an important incentive for their stay. In practice, however, student enthusiasm is often stymied by a lack of adequate language courses and/or poor organisation, leading to students spending most of their time with other exchange students, as opposed to with locals. Countries with popular languages, especially English and French, performed very well in raising linguistic proficiency, while the results in other countries, especially those with less widely spoken languages, where the language of instruction is usually English, varied significantly. The chapter also includes a discussion of the Online Linguistic Support (OLS). It concludes by addressing the question of how the potential of the Erasmus Programme can be better exploited to support multilingualism and language diversity.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Mobility and inclusion in student exchange programmes
- 3.The role and use of languages in studying abroad
- 3.1Literature review
- 3.2Methodology
- 3.3Major findings
- Participants’ language knowledge and motivations
- Online Linguistic Support
- Language choices and development of language skills
- 4.Discussion
- 5.Final remarks
-
Notes -
References
Published online: 21 January 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/wlp.9.14fie
https://doi.org/10.1075/wlp.9.14fie
References
Ammon, Ulrich
Baker-Smemoe, Wendy, Deey, Dan P., Bown, Jennifer & Martinsen, Rob A.
Biel, Łucja
Cairns, David, Krzaklewska, Ewa, Cuzzocrea, Valentina & Allaste, Airi-Alina
Cojocaru, Florentina-Cristina
DAAD
Duczkowska-Piasecka, Małgorzata & Mazurkiewicz, Kornelia
Earls, Clive W.
Ehrhardt, Claus
Feyen, Benjamin & Krzaklewska, Ewa
Fiedler, Sabine & Brosch, Cyril Robert
Gazzola, Michele, Hahm, Sabrina & Wickström, Bengt-Arne
Hadzidaki, Elisa
Hiller, Gundula Gwenn & Vogler-Lipp, Stephanie
Isabelli-García, Christina, Brown, Jennifer, Plews, John L. & Dewey, Dan P.
Jacobone, Vittoria & Moro, Giuseppe
Jahr, Volker & Teichler, Ulrich
Jokić, Nikola
Kalocsai, Karolina
Kaypak, Eda & Ortaçtepe, Deniz
Kinginger, Celeste
Klapper, John & Rees, Jonathan
Klose, Ulrike
Kováčová, Michaela & Kopčová, Veronika
Krzaklewska, Ewa
Martinović, Anna & Dumančić, Dino
Mayring, Philipp
Murphy-Lejeune, Elizabeth
Nißl, Sandra
Norvilienė, Aida
Ożańska-Ponikwia, Katarzyna & Dewaele, Jean-Marc
Papatsiba, Vassiliki
Piron, Claude
(2002) Communication linguistique: étude comparative faite sur le terrain. In Language Problems and Language Planning 26(1), 23–50. (in English: http://claudepiron.free.fr/articlesenanglais/communication.htm). 
Sigalas, Emmanuel
Teichler, Ulrich & Jansen, Kerstin
Tragant, Elsa
Van Mol, Christof
Van Mol, Christof & Michielsen, Joris
Virkkula, Tiina & Nikula, Tarja