Cover not available
Part of
Advances in Interdisciplinary Language Policy
Edited by François Grin, László Marácz and Nike K. Pokorn
[Studies in World Language Problems 9] 2022
► pp. 531–554

Chapter 26
Does global English influence the perception of professional ethical dilemmas?

 | University of Fribourg
 | UNCTAD
 | Observatoire de la Finance
 | University of Zurich
For many multilinguals, the use of a given language is specific to certain areas of life, such as family, social or professional life. This may mean that, for a given person, lexical precision does not imply fluency, and vice-versa. Therefore, having a certain type of skills in a second language does not guarantee a successful use of this second language in all circumstances. This may be especially true with respect to emotional versus factual communication and contents. When a language normally only employed for factual communication is used to express emotional content, the level of precision or understanding may suffer. This research asks the following question: does the use of Global English in the workplace affects the alertness of non-native English speakers in perceiving ethical dilemmas? The hypothesis we explore is that non-native English-speaking employees of organisations in which Global English is the main communication tool, or one of them, may suffer from such communicational, or linguistic, asymmetry, as defined in the paper. In doing so, this study contributes to the ‘Global English’ research agenda and examines the consequences of the use of English. Our statistical results suggest that the importance of linguistic asymmetry becomes acute in situations where ethical issues – with their blend of emotional and technical aspects – emerge in contexts in which otherwise only professional, i.e. factual and technical, contents prevail. The linguistic asymmetry may impair the level of ethical alertness of non-native English-speakers working in organisations where English dominates.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: Global English – an interdisciplinary conundrum
  • 2.The database
  • 3.Preference and skills in English
  • 4.The linguistic dimension of work environments
  • 5.Ethical dilemmas in professional context
  • 6.Linguistic asymmetry in ethical matters
  • 7.Conclusion: Beyond ‘Wall Street English’
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 21 January 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/wlp.9.26dem
References (42)
References
Anglemark, Linnea & John, Andrew. (2018). The Use of English-Language Business and Finance Terms in European Language. International Journal of Business Communication 55(3), 406–440. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Badaracco, Joseph. (1997). Defining Moments: When Managers Must Choose between Right and Right. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Charles, M. (2007). Language Matters in Global Communication. The Journal of Business Communication, 44(3), 260–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chesney, Marc. (2009). Enjeux et conséquences de l’utilisation de l’anglais pour les études d’économie et de gestion à l’université. Observatoire du Plurilinguisme, Geneva.Google Scholar
Costa, Albert, Foucart, Alice, Arnon, Inbal, Aparici, Melina & Apesteguia, Jose. (2014). ‘Piensa’ twice: on the foreign language effect in decision making. Cognition 130(2), 236–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Costa, Albert, Foucart, Alice, Hayakawa, Sayuri, Aparici, Melina, Apesteguia, Jose, Heafner, Joy & Keysar, Boaz. (2014). Your Morals Depend on Language. PLOS one, 9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe. Retrieved from: [URL]
Crystal, David. (2000). English as a Global Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dembinski, Paul H. (2009). Finance Servant or Deceiver? Financialisation at the Crossroads. UK: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dembinski, Paul. H. (2017). Ethics and Trust in Finance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Deneire, Marc. (2008). English in the French workplace: realism and anxieties. World Englishes 27(2), 181–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Swaan, Abram. (2002). The World Language System: A Political Sociology and Political Economy of Language. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
. (2010). ‘Language systems’, in N. Coupland (Ed.), The Handbook of Language and Globalization (pp. 56–76). Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fishman, Joshua A. (1999). The New Linguistic Order. Foreign Policy 113 (Winter), 26–40.Google Scholar
Galloway, Nicola & Rose, Heath. (2015). Introducing Global Englishes. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García, Ofelia & Schiffman, Harold. (2006). ‘Fishmanian Sociolinguistics (1949 to the present)’, in O. García, P. Rakhmiel & S. Harold (Eds.), Language Loyalty, Continuity and Change, Joshua A. Fishman’s Contributions to International Sociolinguistics and Multilingual Matters. Tonawanda, NY. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geipel, Janet, Hadjichristidis, Constantinos & Surian, Luca. (2015). How foreign language shapes moral judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 59, 8–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2016). Foreign language affects the contribution of intentions and outcomes to moral judgments. Cognition 154, 34–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Graddol, David. (2007). English Next: Why Global English May Mean the End of ‘English as a Foreign Language’. London: British Council.Google Scholar
Grin, François, Sfreddo, Claudio & Vaillancourt, François. (2013). The Economics of the Multilingual Workplace. Routledge.Google Scholar
Gunnarsson, Britt-Louise. (2013). Multilingualism in the Workplace. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 33, 162–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gural, Svetlana & Smokotin, Vladimir. (2014). The language of worldwide communication and linguistic and cultural globalization. Language and Culture 1, 4–13.Google Scholar
Hadjichristidis, Constantinos, Geipel, Janet & Savadori, Lucia. (2015). The Effect of Foreign Language in Judgments or Risk and Benefit: The Role of Affect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 21, 117–129.Google Scholar
Jackall, Robert. (1988). Moral Mazes: The World of Corporate Managers. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kankaanranta, Anne, Karhunen, Päivi & Louhiala-Salminen, Leena. (2018). ‘English as corporate language’ in the multilingual reality of multinational companies. Multilingua 37(10), 331–351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lauring, Jakob & Tange, Hanne. (2010). International language management: contained or dilute communication. European Journal of International Management 4(4), 317–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lind, Georg. (1989). Essay review – the measurement of moral judgment. Human development 32, 388–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Louhiala-Salminen, Leena, Charles, Mirjaliisa & Kankaanranta, Anne. (2005). English as a lingua franca in Nordic corporate mergers: two case companies. English for Specific Purposes 24(4), 401–421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maurais, Jacques. (2003). ‘Toward a new global linguistic order?’, in J. Maurais & M. A. Morris (Eds.), Languages in a Globalizing World (pp. 13–36). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morgenson, Gretchen. (2011). Reckless endangerment: how outsized ambition, greed, and corruption led to economic Armageddon. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
Partnoys, Frank. (2003). Infectious Greed. New York: Holt Paperback.Google Scholar
Piekkari, Rebecca, Welch, Denice E. & Welch, Lawrence. S. (2014). Language in international business: the multilingual reality of global business expansion. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Polonioli, Andrea. (2018). A blind spot in research on foreign language effects in judgement and decision-making. Frontiers in Psychology 9(1), 1–5. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rest, James, Navarez, Darcia, Thoma, Stephen J. & Bebeau, Muriel J. (2000). A Neo-Kohlbergian Approach to morality research. Journal of moral education 29(4), 382–395. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reszat, Beate. (2000). Culture and Finance in a Globalized World – An Uneasy Relation. HWWA Discussion Paper 101, Hamburg Institute of International Economics.Google Scholar
Sedivy, Julie. (2016). How morality changes in a foreign language. Scientific American, 14 September 2016. Retrieved from: [URL]
Titus, Craig S. (2008). Le développement moral dans la psychologie morale de Lawrence Kohlberg et de Martin Seligman. Revue d’éthique et de théologie morale HS 251, 31–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). ‘The use of developmental psychology in ethics: beyond Kohlberg and Seligman’, in F. Doridot, P. Duquenoy, P. Goujon, A. Kurt, S. Lavelle, N. Patrignani, S. Rainey & A. Santuccio (Eds.), Ethical Governance of Emerging Technologies Development (pp. 266–285). Retrieved from: [URL]. DOI logo
Volk, Stefan, Köhler, Tine & Pudelko, Markus. (2014). Brain drain: The cognitive neuroscience of foreign language processing in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies 45(5), 862–885. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wellman, Carl. (1961). The Language of Ethics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wickelmaier, Florian. (2015). On not testing the foreign-language effect: A comment on Costa, Foucart, Arnon, Aparici, and Apesteguia (2014). arXiv: Applications. available at [URL]
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Grin, François
2024. Les universités francophones entre internationalisation et anglicisation. Enjeux et société 11:1 ► pp. 21 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.