Edited by Michael Meeuwis and Jan-Ola Östman
[Not in series 170] 2012
► pp. 15–38
Does the autonomy of linguistics rest on the autonomy of syntax?
An alternative framing of our object of study
The presenting semiotic fact of language is its thoroughly indexical character, its contextualization as the mediating text or message in interactional context, necessitating the methods of the interpretative social and behavioral sciences. Farthest removed from this as an object of study is its semiotic character as theorized in the modern structural-functional tradition of linguistic theory that, since Saussure, has transformed from trying to explain the autonomy of diachronic phonetic change to modeling a synchronic system of mutually internally distributed categories of syntactic form. A critique of several approaches to bridging the chasm between these two semiotic poles of language re-situates the “autonomy of syntax” thesis as a small, though vital part of what linguistic theory needs to be about.
Cited by other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 june 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.